comparison

Automation Tool Comparison: n8n vs Zapier vs Make vs Power Automate (2026)

A neutral side-by-side comparison of the four general-purpose workflow-automation platforms with the largest 2026 install bases: n8n (founded 2019, fair-code self-hostable), Zapier (founded 2011, the original integration-as-a-service market leader), Make formerly Integromat (founded 2012, acquired by Celonis in 2020), and Microsoft Power Automate (the Microsoft 365 incumbent automation surface). Comparison points include licensing model, pricing anchors, integration coverage, code extensibility, and the practical deployment patterns we have shipped across ShadowGen engagements in 2025-26.

The Bottom Line: Zapier is the default for non-technical teams on small SaaS estates; Make trades broader visual-logic capability for a steeper learning curve at lower price points; n8n self-hosted is the only option that keeps workflow data inside your VPC; Power Automate is the right choice almost exclusively inside Microsoft 365-licensed enterprises. There is no single winner; the platforms occupy different operational niches.

Automation Atlas tracks more than 130 workflow-automation tools, but four dominate general-purpose buyer conversations in 2026: n8n, Zapier, Make (formerly Integromat), and Microsoft Power Automate. This guide compares them on the criteria that actually decide procurement: licensing model, pricing at realistic production volumes, integration breadth and depth, code extensibility, deployment options, and operational fit. Per the Automation Atlas editorial standard, comparison points are dated and sourced; no platform is named "best" without a cited metric.

Origins and corporate context

Platform Founded Headquarters Parent / status Market positioning
Zapier 2011 San Francisco, USA Private; profitable; raised through Series A then bootstrapped from 2012 Original "integration-as-a-service" leader
Make 2012 (as Integromat) Prague, Czech Republic Acquired by Celonis SE in June 2020; rebranded Make in 2022 Visual-logic alternative to Zapier
Microsoft Power Automate 2016 (as Microsoft Flow) Redmond, USA Microsoft Corporation Bundled with Microsoft 365
n8n 2019 Berlin, Germany (n8n GmbH) Private; $80M+ Series B March 2025 led by Highland Europe Fair-code self-hostable, AI-agent native

Zapier and Make share the most direct overlap; both are hosted-only SaaS platforms aimed at non-technical and semi-technical workflow builders. Power Automate is the Microsoft-ecosystem incumbent, often licensed by default inside enterprise Microsoft 365 contracts. n8n is the only platform of the four that can be self-hosted, and the only one with a fair-code (source-available) license rather than proprietary or BSL.

Pricing anchors (May 2026)

Pricing is the single most-asked-about comparison point. As of May 2026:

Zapier:

  • Free tier: 100 tasks/month
  • Professional: from $29.99/month billed monthly, about $19.99/month billed annually (multi-step Zaps, paths, webhooks; task allowance scales with plan size)
  • Team: about $69 per user/month billed annually, about $103.50 monthly (shared workspace, app-specific permissions)
  • Enterprise: quote-based, typically starts in the high four figures monthly

Make:

  • Free tier: 1,000 operations/month
  • Core: $10.59/month (10,000 operations/month)
  • Pro: $18.82/month (10,000 operations/month + more features)
  • Teams: $34.12/month (10,000 operations/month + team collaboration)
  • Enterprise: quote-based

Power Automate:

  • Included with most Microsoft 365 plans for basic flow types
  • Power Automate Premium: $15/user/month
  • Power Automate Process: $150/bot/month (for RPA scenarios)
  • Hosted RPA: $215/bot/month

n8n:

  • Self-hosted Community Edition: free under the Sustainable Use License
  • Cloud Starter: $24/month (5K workflow executions, 5 active workflows)
  • Cloud Pro: $60/month (15K executions, 15 active workflows)
  • Enterprise: quote-based with SSO, audit logs, and dedicated infrastructure options

The comparison that actually matters is operational cost at realistic volumes. Zapier tasks are billed per data-moving action step (triggers, filters, and built-in tools are free, so a 5-step Zap bills only its action steps); Make operations are billed per module run (more granular and typically more economical for branching workflows); Power Automate flows are billed per flow run for premium connectors. n8n self-hosted carries no per-execution cost beyond your own infrastructure.

Integration coverage

Platform Integration count (May 2026) Custom code Self-host option
Zapier 9,000+ apps JavaScript code steps (limited) No
Make 1,800+ apps Custom HTTP modules; limited code No
Power Automate 1,000+ connectors (split standard/premium) Inline expressions; Azure Functions calls No (cloud only for cloud flows)
n8n 600+ nodes Full JavaScript and Python code nodes Yes (Community Edition or Enterprise)

Zapier wins on raw integration breadth. The trade-off: Zapier's per-task billing makes high-volume scenarios expensive. Make's narrower integration count (~1,800) is compensated by stronger logic and data-transformation primitives within its visual editor. Power Automate's connector count is heavily Microsoft-centric, with rich integration into SharePoint, Teams, Dataverse, and Dynamics. n8n trails on integration count but is the only platform that lets you write arbitrary code inside a workflow node without leaving the visual editor.

Decision flow

flowchart TD
  A[Need workflow automation] --> B{Microsoft 365 licensed?}
  B -- Yes --> C{Need premium connectors / RPA?}
  C -- Yes --> D[Power Automate Premium/Process]
  C -- No --> E[Power Automate Standard]
  B -- No --> F{Data must stay in your VPC?}
  F -- Yes --> G[n8n self-hosted]
  F -- No --> H{Team comfort with visual logic?}
  H -- Non-technical --> I[Zapier]
  H -- Semi-technical, branching workflows --> J[Make]
  H -- Engineering-led + AI agents --> K[n8n Cloud]

Code extensibility

For teams that need anything beyond pure point-and-click, code extensibility matters:

  • Zapier: JavaScript Code steps are limited (10-second execution, 1 MB payload, no npm packages). Acceptable for simple transforms; insufficient for non-trivial logic.
  • Make: Custom Apps require Make's app-builder framework. Inline transforms support a custom expression language. No general-purpose code execution inside a workflow run.
  • Power Automate: Inline expressions via the WDL (Workflow Definition Language) expression language. For more complex logic, flows call out to Azure Functions, Logic Apps, or Power Fx.
  • n8n: Full Node.js code nodes (JavaScript and Python via the Code node) with access to npm packages on self-hosted deployments. The most code-friendly of the four by a meaningful margin.

AI agent and LLM support

The 2024-2026 wave of AI agent and LLM workflows has reshaped the buyer conversation. Status as of May 2026:

  • n8n: AI Agent node (LangChain-based), built-in support for OpenAI, Anthropic, local LLMs, vector stores (Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant), and Memory nodes for stateful agents. The strongest LLM/agent integration of the four.
  • Zapier: Zapier AI features (Copilot, AI Actions) and an OpenAI integration are mature; vector and embedding workflows are supported through partner integrations but not native primitives.
  • Make: AI modules for OpenAI, Anthropic, ElevenLabs, and several specialty providers. Agent-specific primitives lag n8n but are improving.
  • Power Automate: AI Builder for prebuilt models and connectors to Azure OpenAI Service. Workflow patterns lean on the broader Microsoft Copilot stack rather than dedicated agent primitives.

Where each one fits in our engagements

Editor's Note: Across 38 ShadowGen engagements in 2024-26 that touched these four platforms, the practical pattern that has emerged is platform-mix rather than platform-pick. About 60% of engagements end up with two of these platforms running in parallel for different workload types: typically n8n for production-grade AI agent and integration workflows that need to live in the customer VPC, plus either Zapier or Power Automate for the long tail of business-team self-service automations the customer wants to manage without engineering involvement. The single most expensive procurement mistake we see is buying Zapier Team or Enterprise without modelling task volume at a realistic 3-month-out forecast; a 12-person operations team running 8-step workflows at moderate volume routinely hits the Team plan ceiling within 60 days. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen

Sources and dating

All pricing figures above are taken from each vendor's official pricing page as of May 2026. Integration counts are from each vendor's official integrations directory as of the same date. Funding and corporate facts are from primary announcements (Series rounds, M&A press releases). Where a figure could not be verified through primary sources, it is not quoted here. Pricing and feature parity change quarterly in this category; Automation Atlas refreshes this guide at least every 180 days per the maintenance schedule in CONTEXT_MAINTENANCE.md.

Written & reviewed by Rafal Fila · Last updated:

Tools Mentioned

Related Guides

comparison

Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas

Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.

comparison

QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent

QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.

case-study

Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown

Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.

Related Rankings

Common Questions

What should teams do now that Relay.app is shutting down?

Relay.app announced on 16 July 2026 that it is shutting down. Free accounts and all their data are permanently deleted after 15 August 2026 at 23:59 PT, and paid accounts after 14 September 2026 at 23:59 PT, with paying customers keeping full access at no charge until that date. Export the workspace archive well before the deadline, because generation can take up to 24 hours and the emailed download link expires after 48; for the human-in-the-loop workflows Relay.app was usually bought for, Zapier and n8n are the only platforms evaluated here where a reviewer can edit an AI draft mid-run without custom development.

How much does Keystroke cost in 2026?

Keystroke offers three tiers as of July 2026: Hobby (free forever, with $1/month of included usage credit), Pro ($20/month, including $20/month of usage credit), and Organization (custom pricing with SSO, RBAC, and audit logs). Usage is metered on every tier: $0.01 per agent or workflow run, $0.005 per empty poll, $0.007 per web search, roughly $0.067 per hour of sandbox compute, and a 1.1x markup on AI model calls unless you bring your own API keys.

What is Keystroke?

Keystroke is a code-first workflow automation and AI agent platform, launched July 13, 2026 by Y Combinator-backed Sprint Labs, that positions itself as an n8n alternative built for AI coding agents. Workflows are written as typed TypeScript in the user's own repository, usually by agents such as Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex, and deployed to Keystroke's managed cloud or self-hosted under the source-available Elastic License 2.0.

Is Keystroke worth it in 2026?

Keystroke earns a provisional 6.5/10 in its July 2026 open alpha: the agent-native TypeScript model is genuinely differentiated and the free Hobby tier makes it safe to trial, but the platform is pre-1.0 (npm at v0.1.98, public repository published July 13, 2026), has no third-party production track record, and its Elastic License 2.0 restricts offering it as a hosted service. Worth trialing for teams that build through coding agents; too young for production-critical workflows.