Make
by Make.com
Automate your work with visual workflow builder and AI agents. Make, formerly Integromat, is a visual automation platform that connects applications and moves data between them through a drag-and-drop scenario builder. It was founded in 2012 in the Czech Republic, rebranded from Integromat to Make in 2022, and is owned by the process-mining company Celonis.
Performance Scores
17 rankings evaluated
Score range: 4.3 – 8.8
-
#2Best AI-Powered Automation Tools in 2026
Score: 7.8 · Best for: Visual thinkers wanting AI-enhanced workflow design at competitive pricing
-
#2Best Automation Tools for Startups in 2026
Score: 8.3 · Best for: Non-technical founders needing fast visual automation at low cost
-
#2Best Automation Tools by Price-Performance Value in 2026
Score: 8.8 · Best for: Teams wanting the best cloud-hosted value without self-hosting
-
#2Best Automation Tools for Small Business 2026
Score: 7.8 · Best for: Small businesses with moderate technical comfort wanting more for less
-
#3Best Workflow Automation Tools 2026
Score: 7.4 · Best for: Visual, data-heavy multi-step scenarios
-
#3Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
Score: 8.1 · Best for: Teams already running Make scenarios who want an assistant to trigger them
-
#3Best Spreadsheet & Data Automation Tools 2026
Score: 7.4 · Best for: Connecting spreadsheet data to other apps with visual workflow builder
-
#4Best Automation Tools for Retail & Ecommerce in 2026
Score: 7.8 · Best for: Complex multi-step ecommerce workflows
-
#4Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
Score: 7.3 · Best for: Operations and growth teams running multi-step workflows that benefit from per-credit pricing.
-
#5Best Automation Tools for Developers and Engineering Teams in 2026
Score: 7.0 · Best for: Semi-technical teams wanting visual power with some API flexibility
-
#5Best iPaaS and Integration Platforms 2026
Score: 8.0 · Best for: SMBs and agencies needing visual automation at competitive pricing
-
#6Best CRM Automation Tools in 2026
Score: 7.0 · Best for: Complex multi-step CRM automation with data transformation
-
#6Best Free Automation Tools in 2026
Score: 6.8 · Best for: Best free tier among commercial platforms with advanced features
-
#6Best Customer Support Automation Tools in 2026
Score: 7.3 · Best for: Visual support workflow design
-
#6Most Customizable AI Agent Platforms 2026
Score: 6.9 · Best for: Visual builders wanting custom apps and code steps without self-hosting
-
#7Best Automation Tools for Healthcare in 2026
Score: 4.3 · Best for: Mid-size practices comfortable with visual scenarios and credit-based billing
-
#7Best AI Agent Platforms in 2026
Score: 7.1 · Best for: Visual automation with AI agents at scale
Key Facts
Pricing
| Attribute | Value | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Credit billing (since Aug 2025) | Switched from operations to credit-based billing on 27 August 2025; 1 credit = one module action; routers and error handlers cost 0 credits; AI modules charge variable credits | Jul 2026 | Make Help Center — How features use credits |
| Pricing tiers | Free $0 (1,000 credits/mo, 2 active scenarios); Core $9/mo (10,000 credits); Pro $16/mo; Teams $29/mo; Enterprise custom. Annual billing ~15% lower (June 2026) | Jul 2026 | Make Pricing page |
| Make pricing (July 2026) | Make pricing re-verified July 2026, unchanged: Free $0 (1,000 credits/mo), Core $10.59/mo ($9 annual), Pro $18.82/mo ($16 annual), Teams $34.12/mo ($29 annual), Enterprise custom. Billing is credit-based; each paid tier includes a base 10,000-credit allowance. | Sep 2026 | Make Pricing page |
Product
| Attribute | Value | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI suite | Custom AI provider connections available on all paid plans since November 6, 2025 (previously Pro and above); Make AI Agents now listed as available on all plans, with no open-beta qualifier on vendor pages | Jul 2026 | Make Help Center — Adjustments to plans and pricing |
Core Features
| Attribute | Value | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Workflow Builder | Make offers a visual workflow builder that simplifies the creation of complex automation processes. | Jul 2026 | Make homepage |
| Pre-built Integrations | Over 3,000 pre-built integrations to connect various apps and services. | Jul 2026 | Make Integrations directory |
| Integrations | 3,000+ | Jul 2026 | Make Integrations directory |
AI Features
| Attribute | Value | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Agents | Build reusable, intelligent agents that adapt in real time and work across multiple workflows. | Jul 2026 | Make product page |
General
| Attribute | Value | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Billing Model | Switched from operations to credits-based billing in August 2025 (1:1 conversion rate). Credits reset each billing cycle; extra credits expire at the end of the cycle and do not roll forward | Jul 2026 | Make Help Center — Extra credits |
| No-code Platform | No coding required; user-friendly interface for building automation workflows. | Jul 2026 | Make product page |
| Pricing | $10.59/month on Core billed monthly, or $9/month billed annually (Make advertises 15%+ annual savings). Extra credits at 25% premium (reduced from 30% in November 2025) | Jul 2026 | Make Pricing page (cross-checked against tool_pricing_tiers verified 2026-07-01) |
| Advanced Routing System | Advanced routing system to manage complex workflows efficiently. | Jul 2026 | Make Help Center — Router |
| New Modules | If-Else and Merge modules now available in open beta, with nested If-Else and Merge added; Subscenarios for reusable modular workflows | Jul 2026 | Make Help Center — If-else and Merge |
| Run Replay | Testing and debugging tool available on all plans as of Waves 2025 | Jul 2026 | Make Help Center — Scenario run replay |
Support
| Attribute | Value | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP Support | Make automations function as MCP tools that AI systems can discover and execute | Jul 2026 | Make Help Center — Make MCP server |
Strengths
- ●AI scenario builder
- ●Visual data flow mapping
- ●3,000+ app connections (make.com/en/integrations, read 29 Sep 2026)
- ●Competitive pricing from $9/mo
- ●1,000 free ops/month
- ●Visual scenario builder
- ●1,800+ integrations
- ●From $9/mo paid
- ●10x more operations per dollar vs Zapier
- ●Powerful visual scenario builder
- ●Strong data transformation built-in
- ●1800+ app modules
- ●Best price-to-power ratio
- ●Strong data transformation
- ●Good for complex workflows
- ●Clear visual canvas for complex logic
- ●Strong price-to-capability at mid volume
- ●make.com/en/security states SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 and ISO 27001 certification (read 29 September 2026)
- ●Over 3,000 pre-built applications and 30,000 actions in the catalogue
- ●MCP server and MCP client included on all plans at no extra cost, free tier included
- ●No separate metering for MCP; teams pay only for the credits a scenario consumes when it runs
- ●Scenarios exposed as tools stay visually inspectable by non-developers
- ●Visual scenario builder connects spreadsheets to 1500+ apps
- ●Powerful data mapping and transformation modules
- ●1000 free operations per month
- ●Competitive pricing starting at $9/month
- ●Visual builder for complex multi-step ecommerce workflows
- ●Iterator and aggregator modules for batch order processing
- ●Operations-based pricing cost-effective at moderate order volumes
- ●3,000+ integration apps with deep field-level mapping (make.com/en/integrations, read 29 September 2026)
- ●Credits-based pricing is cost-effective for multi-step workflows
- ●Visual scenario builder with iterators, aggregators, and routers
- ●Free plan with up to 1,000 credits/month (make.com/en/pricing, read 29 September 2026)
- ●Strong HTTP module for custom APIs
- ●Built-in JSON and data transformation
- ●Good webhook handling
- ●1,800+ app connections
- ●Granular data routing
- ●Competitive pricing ($9/mo start)
- ●Visual scenario builder for complex multi-step CRM workflows
- ●Native modules for 30+ CRM platforms with deep field mapping
- ●Iterator and aggregator modules for batch CRM data processing
- ●1,000 free operations per month with 2 active scenarios
- ●Full visual builder with branching, iterators, and error handling on free tier
- ●2,000+ integrations available on free tier
- ●Advanced features like webhooks and HTTP modules on free tier
- ●Visual scenario builder for designing support workflows
- ●2,000+ integrations covering helpdesk, CRM, and communication tools
- ●Operations-based pricing cost-effective at moderate ticket volumes
- ●3,000-plus prebuilt apps as of July 2026
- ●Custom-app SDK with a VS Code extension, plus a CI/CD-oriented CLI from April 2026
- ●Blueprint JSON export and import, available without an enterprise plan
- ●Five named error-handling directives, including the only documented commit and rollback semantics in this ranking
- ●Each organisation picks a US or EU data centre at creation, and a per-scenario "keep data confidential" setting stops data being stored after processing (help.make.com, read 13 October 2026)
- ●Enterprise states 99.5% cloud service uptime with defined support SLAs and adds audit logs and custom roles (make.com/en/security and make.com/en/blog/governance-in-make, 4 August 2026, read 13 October 2026)
- ●Published healthcare customer stories include Sterling Administration (adult and elder care, January 2023) and the Dutch pharmacy group APPO (March 2025) (make.com/en/success-stories/automation-in-healthcare and make.com/en/success-stories/how-make-helps-appo-group-reduce-medical-data-input-time, read 13 October 2026)
- ●Credit-based pricing starts with a free plan, so admin flows can be trialled before any spend (make.com/en/pricing, read 29 September 2026)
- ●3,000+ integration apps (make.com/en/integrations, read 29 Sep 2026)
Limitations
- ●Credit-based pricing can spike (make.com/en/pricing, read 29 Sep 2026)
- ●AI agent tooling is newer than its scenario builder
- ●Complex scenarios require manual tuning
- ●Operations counting can be confusing
- ●Free tier limited to 2 scenarios
- ●Complex scenarios need paid plans
- ●Cloud-only with no self-hosting option
- ●Can still get expensive at very high volumes
- ●Migration requires rebuilding scenarios
- ●Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- ●Fewer native integrations
- ●Credits-based billing can confuse
- ●AI modules consume credits quickly
- ●Credit model requires efficient design
- ●MCP exposes scenarios rather than the application catalogue, so agent reach depends on what has already been built
- ●Every new agent capability requires a scenario to be designed and published first
- ●Credit consumption per scenario run is harder to forecast than per-call metering
- ●Requires a separate spreadsheet platform
- ●Steeper learning curve for non-technical users
- ●Complex scenarios can be difficult to debug
- ●Operations pricing escalates above 5,000 monthly orders
- ●Steeper learning curve than Zapier for non-technical store owners
- ●No self-hosted option
- ●Steeper learning curve than Zapier for new users
- ●Some advanced apps gated to higher tiers
- ●Limited custom code execution
- ●Cloud-only with no self-hosting
- ●No Git export or version control
- ●Proprietary scenario format
- ●Credit-based pricing can surprise at volume
- ●Less enterprise governance
- ●Complexity at scale
- ●Operations-based pricing becomes expensive above 10,000 monthly CRM events
- ●Steeper learning curve than Zapier for non-technical CRM administrators
- ●2-scenario limit restricts free tier to simple use cases
- ●Operations-based pricing means complex workflows consume quota quickly
- ●Some premium modules require paid plans
- ●Data processing limits on free tier
- ●Operations pricing becomes expensive above 10,000 monthly tickets
- ●Less AI-native than Zapier for ticket classification use cases
- ●Cloud-only with no self-hosting; EU and US zones and an enterprise proxy agent are the whole story
- ●Custom apps are authored in Make's proprietary IML and JSON rather than a general-purpose SDK
- ●Rollback reverts only modules Make labels ACID, and cannot undo a sent email or a deleted file
- ●AI Agents and Grid are documented as open beta despite marketing pages presenting them as shipped
- ●SSO, audit logs, human-in-the-loop and the on-premises agent are Enterprise-only, with fixed roles and no SCIM
- ●No BAA is published on any Make plan, so any PHI use would need written confirmation from Make (make.com/en/security, read 13 October 2026)
- ●No EHR, HL7, FHIR, claims or pharmacy connector; healthcare apps are a partner-maintained Cliniko app and a few community apps such as Healthie and Jane (make.com/integrations, read 13 October 2026)
- ●Requires Make-specific expertise for advanced scenarios
- ●AI agent features less autonomous than dedicated platforms
- ●Operations-based pricing can spike
Based on evaluations in 17 rankings: Best AI-Powered Automation Tools in 2026, Best Automation Tools for Startups in 2026, Best Automation Tools by Price-Performance Value in 2026, Best Automation Tools for Small Business 2026, Best Workflow Automation Tools 2026, Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026, Best Spreadsheet & Data Automation Tools 2026, Best Automation Tools for Retail & Ecommerce in 2026, Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026, Best Automation Tools for Developers and Engineering Teams in 2026, Best iPaaS and Integration Platforms 2026, Best CRM Automation Tools in 2026, Best Free Automation Tools in 2026, Best Customer Support Automation Tools in 2026, Most Customizable AI Agent Platforms 2026, Best Automation Tools for Healthcare in 2026, Best AI Agent Platforms in 2026
Pricing Plans
Free
No time limit on the Free plan; up to 1,000 credits/mo
- ✓1,000 operations per month
- ✓Up to 2 active scenarios
- ✓100 MB data transfer
- ✓Access to all apps
- ✓Visual scenario builder
- !1,000 ops/month
- !2 active scenarios
- !100 MB data transfer
Core
($9.00/mo billed annually)
Billed monthly or annually (annual price shown per month)
- ✓10,000 operations per month
- ✓Unlimited active scenarios
- ✓Minimum 1-minute interval scheduling
- ✓Operations log access (basic)
- ✓Access to all 1,800+ apps
- !10,000 ops/month
Pro
($16.00/mo billed annually)
Billed monthly or annually (annual price shown per month)
- ✓10,000 operations per month
- ✓Unlimited active scenarios
- ✓Custom variables
- ✓Full-text execution log search
- ✓Priority scenario execution
- ✓Operations usage analytics
- !10,000 ops/month (upgradable)
Teams
($29.00/mo billed annually)
Billed monthly or annually (annual price shown per month)
- ✓10,000 operations per month
- ✓Unlimited active scenarios
- ✓Team roles and permissions
- ✓Shared team connections
- ✓Multiple organizations
- ✓High-priority execution
- !10,000 ops/month (upgradable)
Enterprise
Custom pricing; contact sales
- ✓Custom operations volume
- ✓SSO / SAML authentication
- ✓Dedicated customer success manager
- ✓Custom data residency
- ✓Advanced compliance and security
- ✓SLA guarantee
- !Custom ops volume
About Make
Make, formerly Integromat, is a visual automation platform that connects applications and moves data between them through a drag-and-drop scenario builder. It was founded in 2012 in the Czech Republic, rebranded from Integromat to Make in 2022, and is owned by the process-mining company Celonis. Make's distinguishing feature is its canvas: workflows are drawn as a map of connected modules with visible data flow, branching, iteration, and error handling, which makes complex, data-heavy logic easier to reason about than a linear step list.
The building block is the module, an action within an app such as creating a record, fetching an email, or transforming data. Scenarios chain modules together with routers for branching, iterators and aggregators for working through collections, and built-in error handlers. The platform connects more than 3,000 apps and exposes its own API and custom-app framework for integrations that are not in the catalogue. Make sits between the simplicity of Zapier and the code-first depth of n8n or Pipedream: more capable than a linear builder, less demanding than writing code.
In August 2025 Make changed its billing unit from operations to credits. One credit equals one module action; routers and error handlers cost no credits, while AI modules charge a variable number of credits according to the tokens, files, or pages they process. As of June 2026 the Free plan includes 1,000 credits per month and two active scenarios; Core is $9 per month for 10,000 credits with unlimited active scenarios; Pro is $16 per month adding full-text log search, custom variables, and priority execution; Teams is $29 per month adding shared templates and roles; and Enterprise is custom-priced. Annual billing reduces these rates by roughly 15%. A November 2025 adjustment also raised the cost of extra credits, so high-volume scenarios should be sized against the credit ceiling rather than the headline price.
Make has built an AI suite available across all plans, including Make AI Agents (in beta), an MCP server, an AI Content Extractor, and AI web search, with custom AI-provider connections opened to all paid plans in November 2025. (Earlier references to a separately branded "Maia" assistant are not reflected as a current standalone product; the agent-building capability ships as Make AI Agents.) This positions Make alongside the AI-agent platforms while keeping its visual-automation core.
Make competes with Zapier on ease of use, with n8n and Pipedream on logic depth, and with Power Automate inside Microsoft estates. Its natural buyer wants visual clarity over many-step, data-transforming workflows without writing code, and is comfortable modelling cost in credits. The credit model rewards efficient scenario design and penalises wasteful module use, which is the opposite of a flat per-task plan and the main thing a team migrating from Zapier has to re-learn.
Editor's Note: Across ShadowGen Make builds in 2024-26, the migration to credit billing in August 2025 was the change clients felt most, and AI modules are where credits disappear fastest. On one content-operations scenario, an AI summarisation module consumed credits several times faster per run than the surrounding non-AI modules, so a scenario that looked cheap on paper drained its monthly credits well before month end. The fix we apply now: meter AI modules separately in a short pilot, then size the plan against that measured burn rather than the module count. Make's visual canvas remains the clearest way we know to maintain a forty-module branching scenario. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Integrations (6)
Other Workflow Automation Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationSee How It Ranks
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9…
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two…
Questions About Make
Can healthcare teams run patient-facing workflows on Moxo?
Yes for coordination work, once a signed BAA is in hand: Moxo told Automation Atlas in writing on 6 October 2026 that it signs BAAs, but it publishes none and did not say which plans the agreement covers or whether it reaches Moxo AI. Moxo says it has no native EHR, HL7 or FHIR…
How much does it cost to give an AI agent access to your automation platform?
The cost turns entirely on the platform's billing unit, and as of 26 August 2026 only Zapier publishes an explicit per-call rate. Zapier's documentation states that "Each successful tool call through your MCP server consumes two tasks", while "Tool calls that fail do not consume…
What should teams do now that Relay.app is shutting down?
Relay.app announced on 16 July 2026 that it is shutting down. Free accounts and all their data are permanently deleted after 15 August 2026 at 23:59 PT, and paid accounts after 14 September 2026 at 23:59 PT, with paying customers keeping full access at no charge until that date…
What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
Solo founders in 2026 get the most value from Zapier or Make (broad SaaS glue), n8n self-hosted (free, unlimited runs), Pipedream (generous free tier with code steps), Notion automations, and Lindy (AI agents for inbox and meetings; the alternative Relay.app shuts down September…
Learn More
Which Automation Platforms Can an AI Coding Agent Actually Edit?
This guide compares the canonical workflow representation of ten business process automation platforms and asks a single practical question of each: can an AI coding agent read that representation, change it, and put it back? It covers what each platform exports, what the export…
AI Coding Agents and Automation Platforms: Three Integration Models
This guide classifies the ways an AI coding agent can connect to a business process automation platform into three integration models: reference servers that teach an agent a platform's schema, control-plane servers that let it read and edit workflows on a live instance, and…
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of…