Automation Platform Pricing Changes (Q1-Q2 2026)
A summary of public pricing changes across major automation and AI platforms during Q1 and the announced portion of Q2 2026: Zapier, Make, n8n, Twilio, OpenAI, Anthropic, Airtable, and Notion. All figures are sourced from official pricing pages, dated to April 2026, and exclude rumoured or unannounced changes.
Why Pricing Changes Matter
Pricing is the single fastest-moving data point on any automation platform. A change of $5/month on a starter tier shifts which platform is cheapest for an entry-level use case; a tier rename (or removal) can re-anchor a comparison overnight. This guide collects pricing changes across major automation and AI platforms during the first half of 2026, covering Q1 and the public Q2 announcements available as of April 2026. All figures are sourced from the official pricing pages of each vendor and are dated. Rumoured or unannounced changes are excluded.
Industry reports indicate continued upward pressure on usage-priced tiers in 2026, driven mainly by hosted LLM cost pass-through. Per-task and per-user fixed tiers have been more stable.
Zapier
As of July 2026, Zapier's published lineup runs Free, Professional (from $29.99/month billed monthly, about $19.99/month billed annually), Team (about $69 per user/month billed annually), and custom-priced Enterprise. Annual billing applies roughly a 33% discount versus monthly, and the free plan retains 100 tasks per month. Paid task allowances scale with plan size, and the product suite (Zaps, Tables, Interfaces, Chatbots, Canvas, Agents) carries per-product limits that differ by plan; Zapier's official pricing page is the authoritative reference for current allowances.
Make (formerly Integromat)
Make's Core plan starts at $10.59/month (10,000 operations) and Pro at $18.82/month (10,000 operations with priority execution and access to advanced features). The free plan provides 1,000 operations per month. Make's pricing has been notably stable through Q1 2026; the most visible changes were tier feature reshuffles rather than headline price moves.
n8n
n8n Cloud begins at approximately $24/month for the Starter tier (5,000 workflow executions, 5 active workflows) as of April 2026. The self-hosted community edition remains free under the Sustainable Use License. The Pro tier continues to scale with active workflow count and execution volume.
Twilio
Twilio's base messaging and voice rates are usage-priced and shift more frequently than fixed-tier platforms. Industry reports indicate Twilio adjusted A2P 10DLC pass-through fees in early 2026 in line with US carrier changes; teams running high-volume SMS programs should verify against their actual invoice rather than the published pricing page, which sometimes lags carrier-fee updates by a few weeks.
OpenAI / ChatGPT Codex
Hosted LLM pricing has trended downward across 2026 as model providers compete on cost-per-token. ChatGPT Codex pricing as of April 2026 reflects this trend: the workspace-priced product remains the dominant SKU, with usage costs that vary by model selection. Specific dollar figures are best confirmed on the OpenAI pricing page at the moment of purchase given the cadence of changes.
Anthropic Claude
Anthropic's API pricing for the Claude 4.x family has been adjusted at least once per major model release. As of April 2026 the Claude Pro subscription remains $20/month and Claude Max subscriptions extend the included usage at higher tiers. The Claude API pricing page is the authoritative source for per-token costs by model snapshot.
Airtable
Airtable's Team plan begins at $24/seat/month and Business at $54/seat/month as of April 2026. The free plan retains the 1,000-record-per-base limit. No public tier rename has been announced in Q1 2026.
Notion
Notion's Plus plan begins at $12/seat/month (annual) and Business at $24/seat/month as of April 2026. Notion AI add-on pricing is bundled into higher tiers in some regions; teams comparing across geographies should pull pricing in their own currency to avoid surprises.
Net Effect
For most small teams, the dominant cost line in an automation stack is no longer the workflow runner — it is the hosted LLM bill on agent-style workloads. Workflow-runner pricing across 2026 has been stable to mildly upward; LLM pricing has been more volatile but trending lower per token, with the catch that token counts per task tend to grow as agent scaffolding gets more elaborate. Net spend per useful outcome has not moved as fast as headline per-token prices suggest.
See the Best Workflow Automation Tools ranking for the platforms covered above, the Zapier vs Make comparison for a direct head-to-head, and the Best AI Agent Tools ranking for the agent-platform layer.
Editor's Note: We track public pricing changes for Automation Atlas tool pages on roughly a 90-day cadence, with ad-hoc updates whenever a vendor announces a tier rename. The biggest practical gotcha for clients in early 2026 has been LLM pass-through cost on agent platforms: a workflow that costs $0 to run on a fixed-tier automation runner can still cost $40-200/month in model spend if the agent is verbose. We now quote both line items separately on every proposal.
Tools Mentioned
Zapier
Automate workflows between apps without coding—connect 9,000+ tools with simple, reliable automation.
Workflow AutomationMake
Automate your work with visual workflow builder and AI agents
Workflow Automationn8n
Workflow automation for technical teams
Workflow AutomationTwilio
Cloud communications platform providing APIs for SMS, voice, email (SendGrid), video, and WhatsApp messaging with usage-based pricing.
Integration PlatformsAirtable
Cloud platform combining spreadsheet interfaces with relational database structure and built-in automation
Spreadsheet AutomationChatGPT Codex
OpenAI's cloud-based autonomous coding agent integrated into ChatGPT
AI Coding & Development ToolsRelated Guides
Moxo vs Gumloop in 2026: Texting the Client, or Building the Agent
Gumloop (founded 2023) builds AI agents a company's own staff run; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs processes that wait on people outside the company. Gumloop wins three rounds to two: the way in, per-tool gating and a priced overage. Moxo wins on…
Moxo vs Relay.app in 2026: Where Relay's Approval Workflows Can Go Next
Relay.app, founded in 2021, shut down in September 2026 and deleted every account, workflow and run history; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, is one destination for its human-in-the-loop users. Relay.app takes two rounds, Moxo one, and vendor risk is a draw…
Moxo vs Workato in 2026: The Integration Estate, or the Approval Inside It
Workato, founded in 2013, is an enterprise integration platform whose Workflow apps add human tasks to recipes; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, ships the human step itself. Workato wins three rounds to two: connector reach, change control and the way in…
Related Rankings
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9…
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two…
Common Questions
How do banks and wealth firms use Moxo for client onboarding?
Moxo's financial-services page (read 13 October 2026) pitches account opening and KYC reviews as shared work: the client gets a secure link to see what is needed and sign, while relationship managers, compliance and operations staff review and approve inside one tracked flow. The…
Can healthcare teams run patient-facing workflows on Moxo?
Yes for coordination work, once a signed BAA is in hand: Moxo told Automation Atlas in writing on 6 October 2026 that it signs BAAs, but it publishes none and did not say which plans the agreement covers or whether it reaches Moxo AI. Moxo says it has no native EHR, HL7 or FHIR…
Who is accountable when an AI agent acts in a Moxo workflow?
The company that deploys the agent is accountable: Moxo's Terms and Conditions (read 13 October 2026) make the customer "solely responsible for any AI Content, including the accuracy, quality, appropriateness, and legality thereof". In the workflow, a named person owns each human…
How does Moxo keep humans in control when AI agents run a workflow?
Moxo keeps people on the decisions by design: approvals and other human steps are ones its product page says "only a person can close", and AI agents can fill preparer, advisor or reviewer slots around them (both read 15 September 2026). The checks on AI output are opt-in…