How much does HubSpot cost in 2026?

Quick Answer: HubSpot uses seat-based pricing (Core Seats) with bundled HubSpot AI Credits as of July 2026. Free CRM is $0 (2 users, 500 credits). Starter Customer Platform is $20/seat/month (promo $7-$10). Marketing Hub Professional is $890/month (3 seats, 2,000 contacts) and Enterprise $3,600/month; Sales and Service Hub Professional are $100/seat/month ($90 annual) and Enterprise $150/seat. Workflows (HubSpot's automation) require Professional or higher, and Marketing Hub prices scale with contact count.

HubSpot Pricing (as of July 2026)

HubSpot prices per Core Seat with bundled HubSpot AI Credits (Free 500, Starter 500, Professional 3,000, Enterprise 5,000). The free tools have no time limit (CRM for up to 1,000,000 contacts, unlimited users, 2,000 email sends/month), but automation requires a paid Professional tier.

Hub pricing (key tiers)

Hub Starter Professional Enterprise
Marketing $20/seat (Customer Platform) $890/mo (3 seats, 2,000 contacts) $3,600/mo (5 seats, 10,000 contacts)
Sales $20/seat $100/seat ($90 annual) $150/seat
Service $20/seat $100/seat ($90 annual) $150/seat

The 2026 model is seat-based: paid tiers price by Core Seats per seat/month, except Marketing Hub Pro/Enterprise which keep a flat platform fee with a number of seats included (additional Marketing Pro Core Seats are $45/month). Marketing Hub Professional is now $890/month (up from $800). The Starter Customer Platform bundles all Hubs at Starter for $20/seat, with a new-customer promo down to $7-$10/seat.

Marketing Hub contact scaling (Professional)

Contacts Professional/mo
2,000 $890
10,000 ~$1,025+
25,000 ~$1,750
50,000 ~$2,700
100,000 ~$4,100

Workflows — HubSpot's core automation — remain gated to Professional and above.

How HubSpot pricing compares

Platform 5-user team + email Annual
HubSpot (Marketing Pro + Sales Starter) ~$910/mo ~$10,920/yr
Salesforce (Sales Cloud Enterprise) ~$825/mo ~$9,900/yr
Pipedrive + Mailchimp ~$199/mo ~$2,388/yr

HubSpot is competitive with Salesforce for mid-market but far pricier than point-solution combinations; the value is consolidation onto one platform and database.

Editor's Note: We migrated a 60-person B2B SaaS company to HubSpot Marketing Professional plus Sales Starter, replacing a Pipedrive + Mailchimp + Zapier stack — eliminating the Zapier sync layer saved about 8 hours a week of debugging, with break-even on the time savings in roughly four months. Re-checked July 2026: HubSpot is fully seat-based now (Core Seats + AI Credits), Marketing Hub Professional rose to $890/month, and additional Marketing Pro seats are $45 each — so model the seat count and the contact tier separately, and lean on the $20/seat Starter Customer Platform before jumping to a Pro Hub. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen

Related Questions

Written & reviewed by · Last updated:

Related Tools

Activepieces

No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features

Workflow Automation

Automatisch

Open-source Zapier alternative

Workflow Automation

Bardeen

AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension

Workflow Automation

Calendly

Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.

Workflow Automation

Related Rankings

Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026

A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.

Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026

A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.

Dive Deeper

case-study

Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown

Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.

comparison

Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared

Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.

comparison

Inngest vs Temporal 2026: Durable Functions vs Durable Workflows

Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first durable functions platform with TypeScript and Python SDKs, 50,000 step runs/month free, and Hobby pricing from $20/month. Temporal (2019) is the heavyweight durable workflow engine with seven-language SDK coverage, Cassandra-backed scale, and Cloud pricing from roughly $200/month at low volume or $2.5-4.5K/month self-host. This 2026 comparison covers programming model, pricing, scale ceiling, and operational footprint.