What does Kissflow cost in 2026? Plans and pricing explained
Quick Answer: Kissflow is a low-code work platform priced as a flat platform fee rather than per-user. As of July 2026 the Basic platform tier is about $2,500/month for roughly 50 users (up from about $1,500), per Kissflow's own 2026 comparison content, on an annual commitment; Enterprise is custom-quoted. Kissflow's canonical pricing page no longer publishes tier prices — it is now a consultative "talk to sales" page — so the $2,500 figure comes from Kissflow content rather than a public rate card.
Pricing Overview
Kissflow is a low-code work platform combining workflow automation, process management, project tracking, and case management. It uses a platform-based fee that includes a set number of users, rather than per-user pricing.
Kissflow Pricing (as of July 2026)
| Tier | Price | Users Included | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | ~$2,500/month | ~50 users | Workflow automation, forms, reporting, ~50 processes |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Unlimited processes, SSO, API, custom branding, SLA |
The Basic platform tier is now about $2,500/month for roughly 50 users (up from about $1,500), per Kissflow's own 2026 comparison content, on an annual commitment — so the effective minimum is around $30,000/year. It is a flat platform fee, not per-user. Note that Kissflow's canonical pricing page no longer publishes tier prices; it is a consultative "talk to sales" page, so the $2,500 figure comes from Kissflow content rather than a public rate card, and Enterprise (unlimited processes, SSO, API, white-labeling, SLA) is fully custom-quoted.
Platform capabilities (all plans)
Visual workflow builder (sequential, parallel, conditional routing), a drag-and-drop form builder, case management for unstructured workflows, board/timeline project views, and built-in process-throughput and SLA reporting.
How Kissflow pricing compares
| Platform | ~50-user monthly | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Kissflow Basic | ~$2,500 | BPM + workflow (platform fee) |
| Monday.com Standard | ~$600 (50 x $12) | Work management |
| Smartsheet Business | ~$950 (50 x $19) | Spreadsheet + automation |
| Power Automate | ~$750 (50 x $15) | Cloud flow automation |
Kissflow is more expensive than general work tools but provides deeper business-process management — approval routing, SLA tracking, process analytics, and case management. It makes sense for organisations running many structured processes with approval workflows.
Editor's Note: We deployed Kissflow for a 45-person logistics company automating 12 internal processes (purchase approvals, maintenance requests, onboarding, expense claims), cutting manual routing and status-tracking from about 15 hours a week to three — an essentially immediate payback. The limitation was the ~50-process cap on Basic, which the company hit within eight months as other departments piled on, forcing an Enterprise negotiation. Re-checked July 2026: the Basic platform fee has risen to about $2,500/month (from ~$1,500) and Kissflow's pricing page is now consultative rather than published, so budget for the platform fee plus a likely Enterprise upgrade once process count grows. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
Kissflow
Low-code work platform for process management and workflow automation
Workflow AutomationMonday.com
Visual work operating system with automation recipes for task management, project tracking, and team collaboration.
Project Management AutomationSmartsheet
Dynamic work management with enterprise-grade automation
Spreadsheet AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9, Kissflow 5.8 and ServiceNow 4.8, scored 22 September 2026 on the five weighted criteria. Those criteria cover the step type, the approver's account or licence, the routes available on a rejection, the audit record, and the meter that charges for the decision, and none of them can tell a review from a rubber stamp, so the methodology adds a check readers can run on any product in a few minutes: whether the decision record tells a considered approval from an instant one. Every figure was read from a vendor-owned surface and carries its own date.
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Dive Deeper
Moxo vs Kissflow in 2026: What an Outside Approver Costs, and What the Record Proves
Moxo and Kissflow both sell approvals to people who do not write code, and each wins one round outright: Moxo's Web and Headless SDKs run the approval inside the buyer's own product, under the buyer's own sign-in. Kissflow's portal audit log stamps every event with an actor, a device and an IP, where Moxo publishes no field list. Both answers are quoted, not priced, and both meters punish a one-step request sent to hundreds of clients. Cost, the decision record, rejection routes, AI metering and governance, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.
Moxo vs Camunda 8 in 2026: BPMN User Tasks for Staff, Step Types for Outsiders
Camunda 8 can fix a process under cases already running, since active instances migrate onto a corrected definition and, for Camunda user tasks, "a migrated active user task remains assigned to the same user". Moxo keeps the shared queue that Camunda's Tasklist V2 stops evaluating, with desks that are "a shared inbox that multiple users can pick work from". Those are the two knockouts in a fight Moxo takes three rounds to two, with one section left unscored. Portability, AI review gates and a published price decide the rest, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.
Moxo vs n8n in 2026: Who Runs the Engine and Who Keeps the Record
n8n wins the engine room: Community Edition runs on a self-hosted server at no licence cost, and its code is open to read and change for internal use. Moxo wins the approval itself: its API refuses a step completion from an organisation key, a stalled step has named moves, and its documented deletion keeps the audit rows. Run together, n8n carries the volume and Moxo's flow meter counts only the exceptions. Licensing, approver identity, retention defaults, cost per decision point and governance compared, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.