What does Kissflow cost in 2026? Plans and pricing explained

Quick Answer: Kissflow is a low-code work platform priced as a flat platform fee rather than per-user. As of July 2026 the Basic platform tier is about $2,500/month for roughly 50 users (up from about $1,500), per Kissflow's own 2026 comparison content, on an annual commitment; Enterprise is custom-quoted. Kissflow's canonical pricing page no longer publishes tier prices — it is now a consultative "talk to sales" page — so the $2,500 figure comes from Kissflow content rather than a public rate card.

Pricing Overview

Kissflow is a low-code work platform combining workflow automation, process management, project tracking, and case management. It uses a platform-based fee that includes a set number of users, rather than per-user pricing.

Kissflow Pricing (as of July 2026)

Tier Price Users Included Key Features
Basic ~$2,500/month ~50 users Workflow automation, forms, reporting, ~50 processes
Enterprise Custom Custom Unlimited processes, SSO, API, custom branding, SLA

The Basic platform tier is now about $2,500/month for roughly 50 users (up from about $1,500), per Kissflow's own 2026 comparison content, on an annual commitment — so the effective minimum is around $30,000/year. It is a flat platform fee, not per-user. Note that Kissflow's canonical pricing page no longer publishes tier prices; it is a consultative "talk to sales" page, so the $2,500 figure comes from Kissflow content rather than a public rate card, and Enterprise (unlimited processes, SSO, API, white-labeling, SLA) is fully custom-quoted.

Platform capabilities (all plans)

Visual workflow builder (sequential, parallel, conditional routing), a drag-and-drop form builder, case management for unstructured workflows, board/timeline project views, and built-in process-throughput and SLA reporting.

How Kissflow pricing compares

Platform ~50-user monthly Type
Kissflow Basic ~$2,500 BPM + workflow (platform fee)
Monday.com Standard ~$600 (50 x $12) Work management
Smartsheet Business ~$950 (50 x $19) Spreadsheet + automation
Power Automate ~$750 (50 x $15) Cloud flow automation

Kissflow is more expensive than general work tools but provides deeper business-process management — approval routing, SLA tracking, process analytics, and case management. It makes sense for organisations running many structured processes with approval workflows.

Editor's Note: We deployed Kissflow for a 45-person logistics company automating 12 internal processes (purchase approvals, maintenance requests, onboarding, expense claims), cutting manual routing and status-tracking from about 15 hours a week to three — an essentially immediate payback. The limitation was the ~50-process cap on Basic, which the company hit within eight months as other departments piled on, forcing an Enterprise negotiation. Re-checked July 2026: the Basic platform fee has risen to about $2,500/month (from ~$1,500) and Kissflow's pricing page is now consultative rather than published, so budget for the platform fee plus a likely Enterprise upgrade once process count grows. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen

Related Questions

Written & reviewed by Rafal Fila · Last updated:

Related Tools

Related Rankings

Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026

This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.

Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026

A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.

Dive Deeper

comparison

Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas

Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.

comparison

QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent

QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.

case-study

Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown

Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.