How much does Trello cost in 2026?

Quick Answer: As of June 2026 Trello pricing is unchanged: Free (10 collaborators, 250 Butler runs/month), Standard $5/user/month ($6 monthly), Premium $10/user/month ($12.50 monthly), and Enterprise $17.50/user/month. The 2026 additions are AI features baked into paid tiers: AI-powered quick capture on Standard and AI content generation on Premium.

Trello pricing (as of June 2026)

Plan Annual price Monthly price Butler runs/month Key features
Free $0 $0 250 (per workspace) Unlimited cards, up to 10 boards, unlimited Power-Ups, 2FA
Standard $5/user $6/user 1,000 Advanced checklists, custom fields, AI quick capture, single-board guests
Premium $10/user $12.50/user Unlimited Multiple views (Timeline, Calendar, Table, Dashboard, Map), AI content generation, admin controls
Enterprise $17.50/user (annual only) Unlimited Organisation-wide permissions, multi-board guests, Atlassian Guard SSO

Per-user prices held steady through 2026. Annual billing saves roughly 17% on Standard and Premium. Enterprise is a sliding scale: $17.50/user is the entry rate, and it decreases as the seat count rises.

The 2026 change: AI inside paid tiers

Trello added Atlassian Intelligence features to its paid plans during 2026 — AI-powered quick capture on Standard (turning notes into structured cards) and AI content generation on Premium. These are bundled, not a separate line item, which keeps Trello the cheapest entry point in the project-management category that includes both automation and AI.

Butler automation by plan

Butler, Trello's built-in automation, is available on every plan including Free. The constraint is the command-run limit:

Plan Monthly Butler runs Email commands HTTP requests
Free 250 No No
Standard 1,000 Yes No
Premium Unlimited Yes Yes
Enterprise Unlimited Yes Yes

250 runs on Free suits an individual; 1,000 on Standard covers most small-team workflows; Premium removes the limit and unlocks HTTP requests for calling external APIs from a rule.

Cost at scale (annual)

Team size Standard Premium Enterprise
5 users $25/mo $50/mo ~$88/mo
10 users $50/mo $100/mo ~$175/mo
25 users $125/mo $250/mo ~$438/mo
50 users $250/mo $500/mo ~$875/mo

How it compares

Tool Cheapest paid Unlimited automation at
Trello $5/user (Standard) $10/user (Premium)
ClickUp $7/user $7/user (Unlimited)
Monday.com $9/seat (no automation) $19/seat (Pro)
Asana ~$11/user ~$25/user (Advanced)

Trello is the cheapest way into team project management with automation. ClickUp at $7/user offers more features but a steeper learning curve.

Editor's Note: We set up Trello Standard for a 15-person content team at $75/month, replacing a chaotic shared spreadsheet. Full adoption took one 30-minute session, and Butler handled editorial stage transitions with 8 rules and 4 board buttons at roughly 350 runs a month — comfortably inside the 1,000 limit. Re-checked June 2026: the new AI quick-capture on Standard now turns their Slack notes into cards, which removed a manual triage step we used to do by hand. We still steer teams who need HTTP-request automations to Premium, because that single feature, not views, is usually what forces the upgrade. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen

Related Questions

Written & reviewed by Rafal Fila · Last updated:

Related Tools

Related Rankings

Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026

This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.

Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026

A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.

Dive Deeper

comparison

Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas

Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.

comparison

QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent

QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.

case-study

Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown

Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.