How much does Trello cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: As of June 2026 Trello pricing is unchanged: Free (10 collaborators, 250 Butler runs/month), Standard $5/user/month ($6 monthly), Premium $10/user/month ($12.50 monthly), and Enterprise $17.50/user/month. The 2026 additions are AI features baked into paid tiers: AI-powered quick capture on Standard and AI content generation on Premium.
Trello pricing (as of June 2026)
| Plan | Annual price | Monthly price | Butler runs/month | Key features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | $0 | 250 (per workspace) | Unlimited cards, up to 10 boards, unlimited Power-Ups, 2FA |
| Standard | $5/user | $6/user | 1,000 | Advanced checklists, custom fields, AI quick capture, single-board guests |
| Premium | $10/user | $12.50/user | Unlimited | Multiple views (Timeline, Calendar, Table, Dashboard, Map), AI content generation, admin controls |
| Enterprise | $17.50/user | (annual only) | Unlimited | Organisation-wide permissions, multi-board guests, Atlassian Guard SSO |
Per-user prices held steady through 2026. Annual billing saves roughly 17% on Standard and Premium. Enterprise is a sliding scale: $17.50/user is the entry rate, and it decreases as the seat count rises.
The 2026 change: AI inside paid tiers
Trello added Atlassian Intelligence features to its paid plans during 2026 — AI-powered quick capture on Standard (turning notes into structured cards) and AI content generation on Premium. These are bundled, not a separate line item, which keeps Trello the cheapest entry point in the project-management category that includes both automation and AI.
Butler automation by plan
Butler, Trello's built-in automation, is available on every plan including Free. The constraint is the command-run limit:
| Plan | Monthly Butler runs | Email commands | HTTP requests |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | 250 | No | No |
| Standard | 1,000 | Yes | No |
| Premium | Unlimited | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise | Unlimited | Yes | Yes |
250 runs on Free suits an individual; 1,000 on Standard covers most small-team workflows; Premium removes the limit and unlocks HTTP requests for calling external APIs from a rule.
Cost at scale (annual)
| Team size | Standard | Premium | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 users | $25/mo | $50/mo | ~$88/mo |
| 10 users | $50/mo | $100/mo | ~$175/mo |
| 25 users | $125/mo | $250/mo | ~$438/mo |
| 50 users | $250/mo | $500/mo | ~$875/mo |
How it compares
| Tool | Cheapest paid | Unlimited automation at |
|---|---|---|
| Trello | $5/user (Standard) | $10/user (Premium) |
| ClickUp | $7/user | $7/user (Unlimited) |
| Monday.com | $9/seat (no automation) | $19/seat (Pro) |
| Asana | ~$11/user | ~$25/user (Advanced) |
Trello is the cheapest way into team project management with automation. ClickUp at $7/user offers more features but a steeper learning curve.
Editor's Note: We set up Trello Standard for a 15-person content team at $75/month, replacing a chaotic shared spreadsheet. Full adoption took one 30-minute session, and Butler handled editorial stage transitions with 8 rules and 4 board buttons at roughly 350 runs a month — comfortably inside the 1,000 limit. Re-checked June 2026: the new AI quick-capture on Standard now turns their Slack notes into cards, which removed a manual triage step we used to do by hand. We still steer teams who need HTTP-request automations to Premium, because that single feature, not views, is usually what forces the upgrade. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
Trello
Visual kanban board tool with Butler automation for rule-based task management and team workflows.
Project Management AutomationJira
Issue tracking and project management platform with built-in automation rules for agile development teams.
Project Management AutomationAsana
Project management platform with Rules automation engine for automating task assignment, status changes, and team notifications.
Project Management AutomationMonday.com
Visual work operating system with automation recipes for task management, project tracking, and team collaboration.
Project Management AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9, Kissflow 5.8 and ServiceNow 4.8, scored 22 September 2026 on the five weighted criteria. Those criteria cover the step type, the approver's account or licence, the routes available on a rejection, the audit record, and the meter that charges for the decision, and none of them can tell a review from a rubber stamp, so the methodology adds a check readers can run on any product in a few minutes: whether the decision record tells a considered approval from an instant one. Every figure was read from a vendor-owned surface and carries its own date.
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Dive Deeper
Moxo vs Lindy in 2026: Who Presses Approve When the Agent Asks
Lindy, founded in 2023, sells an AI teammate that lives in Slack and in each person's inbox; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs multi-party processes where approvals are steps only a person can close. Moxo wins three rounds to two: who closes the step, work across companies and the record. Lindy wins reach and testing. Vendor pages and docs read 28 September 2026.
Moxo vs Kissflow in 2026: What an Outside Approver Costs, and What the Record Proves
Moxo and Kissflow both sell approvals to people who do not write code, and each wins one round outright: Moxo's Web and Headless SDKs run the approval inside the buyer's own product, under the buyer's own sign-in. Kissflow's portal audit log stamps every event with an actor, a device and an IP, where Moxo publishes no field list. Both answers are quoted, not priced, and both meters punish a one-step request sent to hundreds of clients. Cost, the decision record, rejection routes, AI metering and governance, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.
Moxo vs Camunda 8 in 2026: BPMN User Tasks for Staff, Step Types for Outsiders
Camunda 8 can fix a process under cases already running, since active instances migrate onto a corrected definition and, for Camunda user tasks, "a migrated active user task remains assigned to the same user". Moxo keeps the shared queue that Camunda's Tasklist V2 stops evaluating, with desks that are "a shared inbox that multiple users can pick work from". Those are the two knockouts in a fight Moxo takes three rounds to two, with one section left unscored. Portability, AI review gates and a published price decide the rest, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.