Can you use Make for custom API integrations?

Quick Answer: Yes. Make's HTTP module sends requests to any REST API, and its JSON module parses responses. Teams can connect to APIs without pre-built integrations by configuring HTTP method, headers, authentication, and body. Make also supports GraphQL, SOAP, and webhook-based APIs.

Using Make for Custom API Integrations

Make (formerly Integromat) provides an HTTP module that connects to any API endpoint, extending its capabilities far beyond the 3,000+ pre-built apps (mid-2026). As of April 2026, the HTTP module is available on all plans including the free tier.

HTTP Module Capabilities

Make a Request

  • Methods: GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE
  • Authentication: API key, Bearer token, OAuth 2.0, Basic auth, custom headers
  • Body types: JSON, form data, raw, multipart (file uploads)
  • Response parsing: Automatic JSON parsing with field mapping

Make an API Key Request

Simplified version for APIs requiring only an API key in headers or query parameters.

Make an OAuth 2.0 Request

Full OAuth 2.0 flow support with automatic token refresh.

Building a Custom API Integration

Step 1: Configure the HTTP Module

  1. Add an HTTP "Make a request" module to the scenario
  2. Enter the API endpoint URL
  3. Set the method (GET, POST, etc.)
  4. Add headers (Authorization, Content-Type)
  5. Configure the request body if needed

Step 2: Parse the Response

Make automatically parses JSON responses. Map response fields to subsequent modules using the visual data mapping interface.

Step 3: Handle Pagination

For APIs that return paginated results, use Make's Repeater module or recursive scenarios to fetch all pages automatically.

Step 4: Error Handling

Add error handler modules to manage API rate limits (retry with delay), authentication failures (refresh token), and unexpected responses (log and alert).

Advanced API Features

  • GraphQL: Send GraphQL queries and mutations via the HTTP module with JSON body
  • SOAP/XML: Use the XML module to build and parse SOAP envelopes
  • Webhooks: Create custom webhook endpoints in Make to receive data from any external system
  • Client certificates: Attach TLS client certificates for mTLS-secured APIs

Practical Example: Custom CRM Sync

  1. Trigger: New row in Google Sheets (incoming lead data)
  2. HTTP module: POST to custom CRM API with lead data
  3. Parse response: Extract the created contact ID
  4. HTTP module: POST to Slack webhook with contact confirmation
  5. Error handler: If CRM API returns 429 (rate limit), wait 60 seconds and retry

When to Use HTTP vs. Pre-Built Modules

  • Use pre-built modules when available (they handle auth, pagination, and error codes automatically)
  • Use HTTP modules for internal APIs, niche SaaS products, or when pre-built modules lack specific endpoints
  • Consider the Make Custom App feature to package HTTP configurations as reusable modules shared across scenarios

Related Questions

Written & reviewed by Rafal Fila · Last updated:

Related Tools

Related Rankings

Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026

This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.

Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026

A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.

Dive Deeper

comparison

Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas

Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.

comparison

QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent

QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.

case-study

Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown

Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.