Can you use Make for custom API integrations?
Quick Answer: Yes. Make's HTTP module sends requests to any REST API, and its JSON module parses responses. Teams can connect to APIs without pre-built integrations by configuring HTTP method, headers, authentication, and body. Make also supports GraphQL, SOAP, and webhook-based APIs.
Using Make for Custom API Integrations
Make (formerly Integromat) provides an HTTP module that connects to any API endpoint, extending its capabilities far beyond the 1,800+ pre-built app modules. As of April 2026, the HTTP module is available on all plans including the free tier.
HTTP Module Capabilities
Make a Request
- Methods: GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE
- Authentication: API key, Bearer token, OAuth 2.0, Basic auth, custom headers
- Body types: JSON, form data, raw, multipart (file uploads)
- Response parsing: Automatic JSON parsing with field mapping
Make an API Key Request
Simplified version for APIs requiring only an API key in headers or query parameters.
Make an OAuth 2.0 Request
Full OAuth 2.0 flow support with automatic token refresh.
Building a Custom API Integration
Step 1: Configure the HTTP Module
- Add an HTTP "Make a request" module to the scenario
- Enter the API endpoint URL
- Set the method (GET, POST, etc.)
- Add headers (Authorization, Content-Type)
- Configure the request body if needed
Step 2: Parse the Response
Make automatically parses JSON responses. Map response fields to subsequent modules using the visual data mapping interface.
Step 3: Handle Pagination
For APIs that return paginated results, use Make's Repeater module or recursive scenarios to fetch all pages automatically.
Step 4: Error Handling
Add error handler modules to manage API rate limits (retry with delay), authentication failures (refresh token), and unexpected responses (log and alert).
Advanced API Features
- GraphQL: Send GraphQL queries and mutations via the HTTP module with JSON body
- SOAP/XML: Use the XML module to build and parse SOAP envelopes
- Webhooks: Create custom webhook endpoints in Make to receive data from any external system
- Client certificates: Attach TLS client certificates for mTLS-secured APIs
Practical Example: Custom CRM Sync
- Trigger: New row in Google Sheets (incoming lead data)
- HTTP module: POST to custom CRM API with lead data
- Parse response: Extract the created contact ID
- HTTP module: POST to Slack webhook with contact confirmation
- Error handler: If CRM API returns 429 (rate limit), wait 60 seconds and retry
When to Use HTTP vs. Pre-Built Modules
- Use pre-built modules when available (they handle auth, pagination, and error codes automatically)
- Use HTTP modules for internal APIs, niche SaaS products, or when pre-built modules lack specific endpoints
- Consider the Make Custom App feature to package HTTP configurations as reusable modules shared across scenarios
Related Questions
- What are the best workflow automation tools for technical writers in 2026?
- What are the best AI-native automation tools in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for finance and AP teams in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for nonprofits in 2026?
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared
Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.
Inngest vs Temporal 2026: Durable Functions vs Durable Workflows
Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first durable functions platform with TypeScript and Python SDKs, 50,000 step runs/month free, and Hobby pricing from $20/month. Temporal (2019) is the heavyweight durable workflow engine with seven-language SDK coverage, Cassandra-backed scale, and Cloud pricing from roughly $200/month at low volume or $2.5-4.5K/month self-host. This 2026 comparison covers programming model, pricing, scale ceiling, and operational footprint.