Can you schedule posts with Buffer via API?
Quick Answer: Yes. Buffer provides a REST API that supports creating, scheduling, and updating posts across connected social profiles. The API requires an OAuth access token and supports Twitter/X, LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, and other connected networks. Buffer for Business plans include API access; Free plans do not.
Scheduling Posts with the Buffer API
Buffer's API enables programmatic post scheduling, useful for custom dashboards, bulk uploads from internal tools, or integration into content pipelines.
API Basics
- Base URL: https://api.bufferapp.com/1/
- Authentication: OAuth 2.0 with access tokens
- Format: REST, JSON responses
- Rate limit: documented in Buffer developer portal
Common Endpoints
Create a Scheduled Post
POST /updates/create.json
Required parameters:
profile_ids[]: Array of profile IDs to post totext: Post contentscheduled_at: Unix timestamp (optional — defaults to next queue slot)media: Image or video attachment (optional)
List Scheduled Updates
GET /profiles/:id/updates/pending.json
Update a Scheduled Post
POST /updates/:id/update.json
Delete a Scheduled Post
POST /updates/:id/destroy.json
Plan Requirements
- Free plan: No API access
- Essentials ($6/month): No API access
- Team ($12/month): API access included
- Agency plans: API access with higher rate limits
Alternative: Buffer Zapier and Make Integrations
For teams that do not want to write code, Buffer has official Zapier and Make integrations that call the API under the hood:
- Trigger: New row in Google Sheets → Add post to Buffer queue
- Trigger: New blog post published → Share on Buffer
- Trigger: Scheduled time → Pull from content database
Social Network Limitations
Each connected network enforces its own API limits and content rules:
- Twitter/X: 280-character limit, rate limits, media size rules
- LinkedIn: Character limits, link preview rules
- Instagram: Business accounts only, media required
- Facebook: Page admin access required
Sample Use Cases
- Content calendar in Airtable pushes scheduled posts to Buffer
- CMS publishes new article and schedules promotional posts automatically
- Internal dashboard for marketing team to bulk-schedule across profiles
- Integration with analytics tools for post performance retrieval
Related Questions
Related Tools
Zapier
Automate workflows between apps without coding—connect 9,000+ tools with simple, reliable automation.
Workflow AutomationMake
Automate your work with visual workflow builder and AI agents
Workflow AutomationBraze
Customer engagement platform for cross-channel push, email, SMS, in-app, and WhatsApp messaging.
Marketing AutomationBrevo
All-in-one marketing platform with email automation, SMS, CRM, and transactional messaging
Marketing AutomationRelated Rankings
Dive Deeper
E-goi vs Brevo 2026: Contact-Based vs Send-Based Omnichannel Marketing
E-goi (Matosinhos, Portugal, origins 1999) and Brevo (Paris, founded 2012 as Sendinblue) are European omnichannel marketing automation platforms with GDPR-first positioning. E-goi prices by contact count with unlimited email sends (Base €8.92/month, free plan up to 5,001 contacts); Brevo prices by send volume with unlimited contacts (Starter from $9/month, free plan 300 emails/day). This comparison covers channels, pricing models, free tiers, APIs, and market focus, with figures verified July 2026.
Braze vs Customer.io vs Iterable 2026: Marketing Automation
Braze (NYSE: BRZE, $593M FY25 revenue) leads enterprise multi-channel engagement with Connected Audiences and Sage AI. Customer.io (2012, Portland) is the developer-first option with JSON segmentation from $100/month entry. Iterable (2013, San Francisco) ships AI Brand Affinity scoring and send-time optimization for mid-market. This 2026 three-way comparison covers data model, channels, pricing, and AI features.
Mailchimp vs Customer.io in 2026: Email Marketing Automation Compared
A comparison of Mailchimp and Customer.io for email and marketing automation in 2026. Covers segmentation models, multi-channel messaging, pricing at scale, and real migration data from a 45,000-subscriber list.