How much does Asana cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: Asana renamed its tiers in 2024-26: the plans are now Personal (free, small teams), Starter, Advanced, Enterprise, and Enterprise+. As of July 2026, Starter is $10.99/user/month billed annually ($13.49 monthly) and Advanced is $24.99/user/month annually ($30.49 monthly); Enterprise and Enterprise+ are custom. The older Basic/Premium/Business names are retired. Asana AI Studio is credit-based, bundled per tier (50K credits on Starter, 75K on Advanced, 200K on Enterprise).
Asana Pricing (as of July 2026)
Asana retired the Basic/Premium/Business tier names; the lineup is now Personal / Starter / Advanced / Enterprise / Enterprise+.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual (per user) | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal (Free) | $0 | $0 | Tasks, list/board/calendar views, basic integrations (small teams) |
| Starter | $13.49/user | $10.99/user | Timeline, forms, basic Rules, custom fields, milestones |
| Advanced | $30.49/user | $24.99/user | Advanced Rules, portfolios, goals, approvals |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | SSO/SAML, data export, admin controls |
| Enterprise+ | Custom | Custom | Advanced security + compliance, audit-log API |
The names changed but the price points map cleanly: Starter ($10.99 annual) was "Premium", and Advanced ($24.99 annual) was "Business." AI Studio is credit-based and bundled per tier (50,000 credits on Starter, 75,000 on Advanced, 200,000 on Enterprise), and an optional Timesheets & Budgets add-on is $5.99/user/month (annual).
Rules automation by plan
| Feature | Personal | Starter | Advanced |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic Rules (single trigger-action) | No | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-step / custom Rules | No | No | Yes |
| Rule limit per project | — | 20 | 50 |
The Starter-to-Advanced gap is the automation line: Starter provides single-trigger rules, while Advanced enables multi-step and custom rule logic. Teams needing meaningful automation should budget for Advanced.
Cost at scale (annual)
| Team Size | Starter | Advanced |
|---|---|---|
| 5 users | $55/mo | $125/mo |
| 25 users | $275/mo | $625/mo |
| 50 users | $550/mo | $1,250/mo |
| 100 users | $1,099/mo | $2,499/mo |
How Asana compares
Starter ($10.99) is competitive with Monday.com Standard ($12) and above ClickUp Business ($7). The jump to Advanced ($24.99) for advanced Rules is a notable step, so confirm you need multi-step automation before upgrading.
Editor's Note: We rolled out Asana for a 40-person marketing agency and set up 23 Rules covering task assignment, section moves, and Slack notifications, saving roughly 6 hours a week of manual triage — we started on the cheaper tier but hit the single-trigger rule limit within two weeks and upgraded. Re-checked July 2026: the tiers are renamed (Premium→Starter at $10.99, Business→Advanced at $24.99), AI Studio credits are now bundled per tier, and there is an Enterprise+ tier — so the "upgrade for multi-step Rules" decision still stands, just under the new Advanced name. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
Asana
Project management platform with Rules automation engine for automating task assignment, status changes, and team notifications.
Project Management AutomationZapier
Automate workflows between apps without coding—connect 9,000+ tools with simple, reliable automation.
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Dive Deeper
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.
QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent
QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.