How much does Asana cost in 2026?

Quick Answer: Asana renamed its tiers in 2024-26: the plans are now Personal (free, small teams), Starter, Advanced, Enterprise, and Enterprise+. As of July 2026, Starter is $10.99/user/month billed annually ($13.49 monthly) and Advanced is $24.99/user/month annually ($30.49 monthly); Enterprise and Enterprise+ are custom. The older Basic/Premium/Business names are retired. Asana AI Studio is credit-based, bundled per tier (50K credits on Starter, 75K on Advanced, 200K on Enterprise).

Asana Pricing (as of July 2026)

Asana retired the Basic/Premium/Business tier names; the lineup is now Personal / Starter / Advanced / Enterprise / Enterprise+.

Plan Monthly Annual (per user) Key Features
Personal (Free) $0 $0 Tasks, list/board/calendar views, basic integrations (small teams)
Starter $13.49/user $10.99/user Timeline, forms, basic Rules, custom fields, milestones
Advanced $30.49/user $24.99/user Advanced Rules, portfolios, goals, approvals
Enterprise Custom Custom SSO/SAML, data export, admin controls
Enterprise+ Custom Custom Advanced security + compliance, audit-log API

The names changed but the price points map cleanly: Starter ($10.99 annual) was "Premium", and Advanced ($24.99 annual) was "Business." AI Studio is credit-based and bundled per tier (50,000 credits on Starter, 75,000 on Advanced, 200,000 on Enterprise), and an optional Timesheets & Budgets add-on is $5.99/user/month (annual).

Rules automation by plan

Feature Personal Starter Advanced
Basic Rules (single trigger-action) No Yes Yes
Multi-step / custom Rules No No Yes
Rule limit per project — 20 50

The Starter-to-Advanced gap is the automation line: Starter provides single-trigger rules, while Advanced enables multi-step and custom rule logic. Teams needing meaningful automation should budget for Advanced.

Cost at scale (annual)

Team Size Starter Advanced
5 users $55/mo $125/mo
25 users $275/mo $625/mo
50 users $550/mo $1,250/mo
100 users $1,099/mo $2,499/mo

How Asana compares

Starter ($10.99) is competitive with Monday.com Standard ($12) and above ClickUp Business ($7). The jump to Advanced ($24.99) for advanced Rules is a notable step, so confirm you need multi-step automation before upgrading.

Editor's Note: We rolled out Asana for a 40-person marketing agency and set up 23 Rules covering task assignment, section moves, and Slack notifications, saving roughly 6 hours a week of manual triage — we started on the cheaper tier but hit the single-trigger rule limit within two weeks and upgraded. Re-checked July 2026: the tiers are renamed (Premium→Starter at $10.99, Business→Advanced at $24.99), AI Studio credits are now bundled per tier, and there is an Enterprise+ tier — so the "upgrade for multi-step Rules" decision still stands, just under the new Advanced name. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen

Related Questions

Written & reviewed by Rafal Fila · Last updated:

Related Tools

Related Rankings

Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026

Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9, Kissflow 5.8 and ServiceNow 4.8, scored 22 September 2026 on the five weighted criteria. Those criteria cover the step type, the approver's account or licence, the routes available on a rejection, the audit record, and the meter that charges for the decision, and none of them can tell a review from a rubber stamp, so the methodology adds a check readers can run on any product in a few minutes: whether the decision record tells a considered approval from an instant one. Every figure was read from a vendor-owned surface and carries its own date.

Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026

This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.

Dive Deeper

comparison

Moxo vs Kissflow in 2026: What an Outside Approver Costs, and What the Record Proves

Moxo and Kissflow both sell approvals to people who do not write code, and each wins one round outright: Moxo's Web and Headless SDKs run the approval inside the buyer's own product, under the buyer's own sign-in. Kissflow's portal audit log stamps every event with an actor, a device and an IP, where Moxo publishes no field list. Both answers are quoted, not priced, and both meters punish a one-step request sent to hundreds of clients. Cost, the decision record, rejection routes, AI metering and governance, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.

comparison

Moxo vs Camunda 8 in 2026: BPMN User Tasks for Staff, Step Types for Outsiders

Camunda 8 can fix a process under cases already running, since active instances migrate onto a corrected definition and, for Camunda user tasks, "a migrated active user task remains assigned to the same user". Moxo keeps the shared queue that Camunda's Tasklist V2 stops evaluating, with desks that are "a shared inbox that multiple users can pick work from". Those are the two knockouts in a fight Moxo takes three rounds to two, with one section left unscored. Portability, AI review gates and a published price decide the rest, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.

comparison

Moxo vs n8n in 2026: Who Runs the Engine and Who Keeps the Record

n8n wins the engine room: Community Edition runs on a self-hosted server at no licence cost, and its code is open to read and change for internal use. Moxo wins the approval itself: its API refuses a step completion from an organisation key, a stalled step has named moves, and its documented deletion keeps the audit rows. Run together, n8n carries the volume and Moxo's flow meter counts only the exceptions. Licensing, approver identity, retention defaults, cost per decision point and governance compared, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.