How much does Zoho Flow cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: Zoho Flow prices per organisation, not per seat. As of July 2026: Free (5 flows, 100 tasks/month), Standard $29/organisation/month ($290/year billed annually), Professional $49/organisation/month ($490/year), and custom Enterprise. This is up from the widely-cited legacy figures of $10 (Standard) and $24 (Professional). Pricing is task-metered, with Standard exposing about 22 task tiers (5,000 to 5 million/month) and Professional about 21. For Zoho-ecosystem teams, the per-org model and native Zoho connections are the value.
Zoho Flow Pricing (as of July 2026)
Zoho Flow uses per-organisation pricing, not per-user — a 20-person team pays the same as a 2-person team on a given plan.
| Plan | Price | Flows | Tasks/mo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 5 | 100 |
| Standard | $29/org/mo ($290/yr) | 20 | From 5,000 (task-metered) |
| Professional | $49/org/mo ($490/yr) | 50 | From 10,000 (task-metered) |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited | Custom |
The 2026 change is a price rise: Standard is now $29/month and Professional $49/month (up from the widely-cited $10 and $24). Pricing is task-metered — Standard exposes ~22 task tiers (5,000 to 5,000,000/month) and Professional ~21 — so you select a task allowance within the plan.
Zoho One bundle
Zoho One ($45/employee/month) includes all 55+ Zoho apps, including Flow. For organisations using 3-4 Zoho products, Zoho One is usually the better value; standalone Flow is cheaper only for teams using Flow alone or with one other Zoho app.
How Zoho Flow compares
| Tool | Free tier | Entry paid | Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zoho Flow | 5 flows, 100 tasks | $29/org/mo | Per-org, task-metered |
| Zapier | 5 zaps, 100 tasks | $29.99/mo | Per-account, task-metered |
| Make | 2 scenarios | $10.59/mo | Per-account, operation-metered |
| n8n Cloud | Community free | $24/mo | Execution-metered |
At $29/org, Zoho Flow is still efficient for larger teams (per-org billing) even after the increase, and its native Zoho-to-Zoho connections remain faster than third-party integrations.
Editor's Note: We set up Zoho Flow for a 20-person marketing agency already on Zoho CRM + Desk — the native Zoho-to-Zoho integration was near-instant, and the per-org model made it far cheaper than a per-seat tool at that headcount. Re-checked July 2026: Zoho raised Flow to Standard $29 / Professional $49 per org (from $10/$24), so the gap versus Zapier has narrowed on the sticker, but the per-organisation billing still wins for larger teams — and Zoho-ecosystem shops should compare standalone Flow against the Zoho One bundle, which includes Flow. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
Zoho Flow
Cloud-based integration and workflow automation platform connecting Zoho ecosystem and 1,000+ third-party applications.
Workflow AutomationZapier
Automate workflows between apps without coding—connect 9,000+ tools with simple, reliable automation.
Workflow AutomationMake
Automate your work with visual workflow builder and AI agents
Workflow Automationn8n
Workflow automation for technical teams
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Dive Deeper
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.
QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent
QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.