Tines vs Torq vs Swimlane: which SOAR fits in 2026?

Quick Answer: Tines is the strongest pick for mid-market SOCs that want low-code playbooks and lightweight case management. Torq fits cloud-native SecOps teams that need deep integration breadth and per-execution pricing. Swimlane suits regulated enterprises that need built-in case management, FedRAMP-authorised hosting, and code-level extensibility, as of May 2026.

Three-Way Snapshot

Dimension Tines Torq Swimlane
Founded 2018 (Dublin) 2020 (Portland) 2014 (Denver)
Build style Low-code stories Low-code + Python Low-code + Python
Native integrations ~200 ~300 ~600 (Solutions Hub)
Case management Lightweight Lightweight + BYO ticketing Built-in
Pricing model Per-action Per-execution (Hyperautomation) Per-analyst + module
Deployment Cloud + self-hosted Tenant Cloud Cloud + on-prem + FedRAMP

Integration counts and pricing models reflect publicly listed information as of May 2026.

When Tines Wins

Tines is the mid-market default. Strengths in 2026:

  • Story-builder UI accessible to tier-1 analysts without scripting
  • Self-hosted Tenant option for regulated mid-market SOCs
  • Predictable per-action pricing for known playbook volumes

When Torq Wins

Torq is the cloud-native, integration-heavy choice. Strengths:

  • Wide native integration catalog focused on cloud and SaaS security tools
  • Hyperautomation pricing scales with execution volume rather than seats
  • Strong fit for SOCs that mix low-code with Python for custom enrichment

When Swimlane Wins

Swimlane is the regulated-enterprise choice. Strengths:

  • Built-in case management as a system of record for incidents
  • FedRAMP-authorised hosting for US federal customers
  • Solutions Hub catalog with deep verified integrations
  • On-prem option for sovereign-cloud and air-gapped environments

A Decision Heuristic

Most 2026 procurement processes can be reduced to three questions:

  • Do you need built-in case management? If yes, lean Swimlane. If no, lean Tines or Torq
  • Are you mostly cloud and SaaS, or mixed cloud/on-prem? Cloud-only favours Torq; mixed favours Swimlane
  • Will tier-1 analysts build playbooks, or only detection engineers? Analyst-driven favours Tines

Run a 30-60 day proof of value with the same three playbooks in each finalist before committing to a multi-year contract.

Related Questions

Written & reviewed by Rafal Fila · Last updated:

Related Tools

Related Rankings

Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026

This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.

Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026

A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.

Dive Deeper

guide

Client Portals vs Workflow Orchestration Platforms: What Changes When External Parties Act Inside a Process

What changes when a client or supplier has to act inside your process, not just watch it? This guide compares four client portals with four orchestration platforms on how outsiders get in, whether you pay for them and what the audit log records, from vendor sources read 14 and 15 September 2026.

comparison

Moxo vs Zapier in 2026: Human Approval Steps, External Participants and Pricing

Moxo and Zapier both put a person in front of an automated decision, from opposite ends: Moxo builds the process out of human steps and attaches AI, while Zapier pauses an automation for a reviewer through its Human in the Loop app. This guide compares approvers, rejection, AI approval, audit logs, governance and pricing, verified 14 and 15 September 2026.

comparison

Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas

Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.