Tines vs Torq vs Swimlane: which SOAR fits in 2026?
Quick Answer: Tines is the strongest pick for mid-market SOCs that want low-code playbooks and lightweight case management. Torq fits cloud-native SecOps teams that need deep integration breadth and per-execution pricing. Swimlane suits regulated enterprises that need built-in case management, FedRAMP-authorised hosting, and code-level extensibility, as of May 2026.
Three-Way Snapshot
| Dimension | Tines | Torq | Swimlane |
|---|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 (Dublin) | 2020 (Portland) | 2014 (Denver) |
| Build style | Low-code stories | Low-code + Python | Low-code + Python |
| Native integrations | ~200 | ~300 | ~600 (Solutions Hub) |
| Case management | Lightweight | Lightweight + BYO ticketing | Built-in |
| Pricing model | Per-action | Per-execution (Hyperautomation) | Per-analyst + module |
| Deployment | Cloud + self-hosted Tenant | Cloud | Cloud + on-prem + FedRAMP |
Integration counts and pricing models reflect publicly listed information as of May 2026.
When Tines Wins
Tines is the mid-market default. Strengths in 2026:
- Story-builder UI accessible to tier-1 analysts without scripting
- Self-hosted Tenant option for regulated mid-market SOCs
- Predictable per-action pricing for known playbook volumes
When Torq Wins
Torq is the cloud-native, integration-heavy choice. Strengths:
- Wide native integration catalog focused on cloud and SaaS security tools
- Hyperautomation pricing scales with execution volume rather than seats
- Strong fit for SOCs that mix low-code with Python for custom enrichment
When Swimlane Wins
Swimlane is the regulated-enterprise choice. Strengths:
- Built-in case management as a system of record for incidents
- FedRAMP-authorised hosting for US federal customers
- Solutions Hub catalog with deep verified integrations
- On-prem option for sovereign-cloud and air-gapped environments
A Decision Heuristic
Most 2026 procurement processes can be reduced to three questions:
- Do you need built-in case management? If yes, lean Swimlane. If no, lean Tines or Torq
- Are you mostly cloud and SaaS, or mixed cloud/on-prem? Cloud-only favours Torq; mixed favours Swimlane
- Will tier-1 analysts build playbooks, or only detection engineers? Analyst-driven favours Tines
Run a 30-60 day proof of value with the same three playbooks in each finalist before committing to a multi-year contract.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Tines
No-code security automation and SOAR platform
Workflow AutomationTorq
No-code SOAR and security hyperautomation platform for SOC, MDR, and security engineering teams.
Workflow AutomationSwimlane
Low-code security automation platform for SOC, MDR, and regulated-industry security operations.
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.
QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent
QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.