What are the Supabase free tier limits in 2026?
Quick Answer: As of May 2026, the Supabase free tier includes 500 MB database storage, 1 GB file storage, 5 GB bandwidth, 50,000 monthly active users, two free projects, unlimited API requests within those limits, and 7-day log retention. Projects are paused after one week of inactivity on the free tier.
Supabase Free Tier (as of May 2026)
Supabase, founded in 2020, is an open-source Firebase alternative offering Postgres, Auth, Storage, Edge Functions, Realtime, and Vector embeddings. The free tier covers small projects and prototypes.
What's included
- 2 free projects per organization
- 500 MB Postgres database per project
- 1 GB file storage per project
- 5 GB bandwidth/month
- 50,000 monthly active users (Auth)
- 500,000 Edge Function invocations/month
- Unlimited API requests within the bandwidth cap
- 7 days of log retention
- Community support
Important free-tier behavior
Free-tier projects are paused after one week of inactivity. They can be restored from the dashboard, but pausing means the project is not reachable until restored. This makes the free tier unsuitable for production workloads that go quiet for periods longer than a week.
Free vs Pro vs Team
| Feature | Free | Pro ($25/mo) | Team ($599/mo) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projects | 2 | unlimited paid | unlimited paid |
| Database | 500 MB | 8 GB included | 8 GB included |
| Storage | 1 GB | 100 GB included | 100 GB included |
| Bandwidth | 5 GB | 250 GB included | 250 GB included |
| MAUs | 50,000 | 100,000 included | 100,000 included |
| Log retention | 7 days | 7 days | 28 days |
| Inactivity pause | Yes (1 week) | No | No |
| SOC 2 reports | No | No | Yes |
When to Upgrade
- The project is in production and cannot afford an inactivity pause.
- Database or storage is approaching the free cap.
- The team needs daily backups (Pro tier).
- The application requires SOC 2 evidence (Team tier).
Caveats
These limits reflect Supabase's pricing as of May 2026. Limits and pricing have shifted several times in past years; confirm current numbers on supabase.com/pricing before architecting around specific caps. Edge Function invocations and Realtime concurrent connections are billed separately above the free quota.
Editor's Note: Across ShadowGen prototypes on Supabase Free in 2024-26, the limit that catches teams is not the 500 MB database or the 50,000 monthly active users; it is the pause. A Free project with no API requests for seven days goes offline until someone manually restores it, which we have watched take down a client's staging environment over a quiet holiday week. For anything a stakeholder might open unannounced we either keep a scheduled request alive or move it to Pro. The data survives the pause, but the downtime does not look good in a live demo. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
Supabase
Open-source Firebase alternative with PostgreSQL, auth, Edge Functions, and vector embeddings
ETL & Data PipelinesActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Dive Deeper
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.
QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent
QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.