What are the Supabase free tier limits in 2026?
Quick Answer: As of May 2026, the Supabase free tier includes 500 MB database storage, 1 GB file storage, 5 GB bandwidth, 50,000 monthly active users, two free projects, unlimited API requests within those limits, and 7-day log retention. Projects are paused after one week of inactivity on the free tier.
Supabase Free Tier (as of May 2026)
Supabase, founded in 2020, is an open-source Firebase alternative offering Postgres, Auth, Storage, Edge Functions, Realtime, and Vector embeddings. The free tier covers small projects and prototypes.
What's included
- 2 free projects per organization
- 500 MB Postgres database per project
- 1 GB file storage per project
- 5 GB bandwidth/month
- 50,000 monthly active users (Auth)
- 500,000 Edge Function invocations/month
- Unlimited API requests within the bandwidth cap
- 7 days of log retention
- Community support
Important free-tier behavior
Free-tier projects are paused after one week of inactivity. They can be restored from the dashboard, but pausing means the project is not reachable until restored. This makes the free tier unsuitable for production workloads that go quiet for periods longer than a week.
Free vs Pro vs Team
| Feature | Free | Pro ($25/mo) | Team ($599/mo) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projects | 2 | unlimited paid | unlimited paid |
| Database | 500 MB | 8 GB included | 8 GB included |
| Storage | 1 GB | 100 GB included | 100 GB included |
| Bandwidth | 5 GB | 250 GB included | 250 GB included |
| MAUs | 50,000 | 100,000 included | 100,000 included |
| Log retention | 7 days | 7 days | 28 days |
| Inactivity pause | Yes (1 week) | No | No |
| SOC 2 reports | No | No | Yes |
When to Upgrade
- The project is in production and cannot afford an inactivity pause.
- Database or storage is approaching the free cap.
- The team needs daily backups (Pro tier).
- The application requires SOC 2 evidence (Team tier).
Caveats
These limits reflect Supabase's pricing as of May 2026. Limits and pricing have shifted several times in past years; confirm current numbers on supabase.com/pricing before architecting around specific caps. Edge Function invocations and Realtime concurrent connections are billed separately above the free quota.
Related Questions
- What are the best workflow automation tools for technical writers in 2026?
- What are the best AI-native automation tools in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for finance and AP teams in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for nonprofits in 2026?
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared
Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.
Inngest vs Temporal 2026: Durable Functions vs Durable Workflows
Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first durable functions platform with TypeScript and Python SDKs, 50,000 step runs/month free, and Hobby pricing from $20/month. Temporal (2019) is the heavyweight durable workflow engine with seven-language SDK coverage, Cassandra-backed scale, and Cloud pricing from roughly $200/month at low volume or $2.5-4.5K/month self-host. This 2026 comparison covers programming model, pricing, scale ceiling, and operational footprint.