How much does n8n cost? Self-hosted vs cloud pricing
Quick Answer: n8n is free to self-host with unlimited workflows and executions. The cloud version starts at $24/month (Starter, 2,500 executions) and $60/month (Pro, 10,000 executions). Self-hosting requires only a $5-20/month VPS, making n8n the most cost-effective automation tool for technical teams.
n8n Pricing Overview
n8n offers two distinct deployment models with very different pricing: a free self-hosted option and a paid cloud-hosted service. This makes n8n one of the most flexible automation tools in terms of cost, ranging from $0 to enterprise-tier pricing depending on specific needs.
Self-Hosted n8n (Free)
The self-hosted version of n8n is available under a fair-code license at no cost. You run it on your own infrastructure (a VPS, Docker container, or Kubernetes cluster) and get:
- Unlimited workflows — no caps on the number of automations
- Unlimited executions — no per-task or per-operation charges
- All 400+ integration nodes — same node library as cloud
- Full code access — JavaScript and Python within workflow nodes
- Community support — active forum and Discord community
The only costs are the infrastructure (a $5-20/month VPS is sufficient for most use cases) and the time to maintain the installation (updates, backups, SSL certificates).
Cloud-Hosted n8n Pricing (2026)
| Plan | Price | Executions | Workflows | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $24/month | 2,500/month | Unlimited | 5 active workflows, basic support |
| Pro | $60/month | 10,000/month | Unlimited | Unlimited active workflows, execution debugging, global variables |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Unlimited | SSO/SAML, admin panel, SLA, dedicated support |
Additional executions are available at pay-as-you-go rates.
Self-Hosted vs Cloud: When to Choose Each
Choose Self-Hosted When:
- Organizations have DevOps resources to manage infrastructure
- Organizations need unlimited executions at zero marginal cost
- Data residency or air-gapped environments are required
- Organizations want to run n8n on internal networks without internet access
Choose Cloud When:
- You prefer zero-maintenance managed hosting
- Organizations need automatic updates and scaling
- The team lacks infrastructure management skills
- Organizations want built-in execution history and debugging tools
n8n vs Competitors on Price
| Platform | Free Tier | 10,000 tasks/month | Self-Hosted |
|---|---|---|---|
| n8n | Unlimited (self-hosted) | $60/month (cloud) | Yes (free) |
| Zapier | 100 tasks/month | $89.99/month | No |
| Make | 1,000 ops/month | $32.83/month | No |
| Activepieces | Unlimited (self-hosted) | ~$25/month (cloud) | Yes (free) |
n8n's self-hosted model makes it the most cost-effective option for teams running thousands of workflow executions per month. On cloud, Make offers lower per-operation pricing, but n8n's unlimited workflow count and code flexibility provide better value for complex use cases.
Verdict
n8n is the best-value automation tool on the market if users can self-host. At $0 for unlimited workflows and executions, it undercuts every competitor. The cloud version is competitively priced at $24-60/month and is worth it for teams that prioritize convenience over cost savings.
Editor's Note: Across ShadowGen n8n work in 2024-26, the honest version of self-hosted-versus-Cloud is a staffing question, not a pricing one. Self-hosting removes per-execution billing entirely: on a single 2 vCPU / 4 GB node we have run low-thousands of executions a day for the cost of the VPS, an order of magnitude under the equivalent Cloud plan. What that price hides is who patches it, backs it up, and prunes old execution data, which in our experience runs to roughly half a day a month of someone's time once monitoring is counted. If no one will own that, Cloud's metered billing is genuinely cheaper than the engineering hours self-hosting costs. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
- What are the best workflow automation tools for technical writers in 2026?
- What are the best AI-native automation tools in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for finance and AP teams in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for nonprofits in 2026?
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared
Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.
Inngest vs Temporal 2026: Durable Functions vs Durable Workflows
Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first durable functions platform with TypeScript and Python SDKs, 50,000 step runs/month free, and Hobby pricing from $20/month. Temporal (2019) is the heavyweight durable workflow engine with seven-language SDK coverage, Cassandra-backed scale, and Cloud pricing from roughly $200/month at low volume or $2.5-4.5K/month self-host. This 2026 comparison covers programming model, pricing, scale ceiling, and operational footprint.