How much does n8n cost? Self-hosted vs cloud pricing
Quick Answer: n8n is free to self-host with unlimited workflows and executions. As of July 2026 the cloud version is $24/month (Starter, 2,500 executions, ~$20 annual), $60/month (Pro, 10,000 executions, ~$50 annual), and a new $800/month Business tier (40,000 executions, 30 concurrent, self-hosted option, ~$667 annual), with custom Enterprise. Self-hosting needs only a $5-20/month VPS, making n8n the most cost-effective automation tool for technical teams that can run their own infrastructure.
n8n Pricing Overview
n8n offers two deployment models with very different pricing: a free self-hosted option and a paid cloud service. That range, from $0 to enterprise pricing, makes it one of the most cost-flexible automation tools.
Self-Hosted n8n (Free)
The self-hosted version is available under a fair-code license at no cost. You run it on your own infrastructure (a VPS, Docker container, or Kubernetes cluster) and get:
- Unlimited workflows — no caps on the number of automations
- Unlimited executions — no per-task or per-operation charges
- All integration nodes — the same node library as cloud
- Full code access — JavaScript and Python within workflow nodes
- Community support — active forum and Discord
The only costs are infrastructure (a $5-20/month VPS suits most use cases) and the time to maintain the installation.
Cloud-Hosted n8n Pricing (July 2026)
| Plan | Price | Annual (effective) | Executions | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $24/month | ~$20/month | 2,500/month | 5 active workflows, basic support |
| Pro | $60/month | ~$50/month | 10,000/month | Unlimited active workflows, execution debugging, global variables |
| Business | $800/month | ~$667/month | 40,000/month | 30 concurrent executions, 6 shared projects, 30-day insights, self-hosted option |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom | SSO/SAML, admin panel, 200+ concurrent, SLA, dedicated support |
The Business tier ($800/month) is the 2026 addition, sitting between Pro and Enterprise for teams that need higher execution volume, concurrency, and a self-hosted option without a full Enterprise contract. Annual billing runs about 17% cheaper on Starter and Pro. Additional executions are available at pay-as-you-go rates.
Self-Hosted vs Cloud: When to Choose Each
Choose Self-Hosted When:
- The team has DevOps resources to manage infrastructure
- You need unlimited executions at zero marginal cost
- Data residency or air-gapped environments are required
Choose Cloud When:
- You prefer zero-maintenance managed hosting
- You need automatic updates and scaling
- The team lacks infrastructure-management skills
n8n vs Competitors on Price
| Platform | Free Tier | 10,000 tasks/month | Self-Hosted |
|---|---|---|---|
| n8n | Unlimited (self-hosted) | $60/month (cloud) | Yes (free) |
| Zapier | 100 tasks/month | from $29.99/month | No |
| Make | 1,000 credits/month | ~$32.83/month | No |
| Activepieces | Unlimited (self-hosted) | ~$25/month (cloud) | Yes (free) |
n8n's self-hosted model makes it the most cost-effective option for teams running thousands of executions per month. On cloud, Make offers lower per-operation pricing, but n8n's unlimited workflow count and code flexibility suit complex use cases.
Editor's Note: Across ShadowGen n8n work in 2024-26, the honest version of self-hosted-versus-Cloud is a staffing question, not a pricing one. Self-hosting removes per-execution billing entirely: on a single 2 vCPU / 4 GB node we have run low-thousands of executions a day for the cost of the VPS, an order of magnitude under the equivalent Cloud plan. What that price hides is who patches it, backs it up, and prunes old execution data — roughly half a day a month of someone's time once monitoring is counted. Re-checked July 2026: the new Cloud Business tier ($800/mo, 40,000 executions, self-hosted option) is aimed exactly at teams that have outgrown Pro's 10,000 executions but do not want a full Enterprise contract. If no one will own maintenance, Cloud's metered billing is still cheaper than the engineering hours self-hosting costs. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
- What are the best workflow automation tools for technical writers in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for finance and AP teams in 2026?
- What are the best AI-native automation tools in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for nonprofits in 2026?
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent
QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared
Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.