How much does n8n cost? Self-hosted vs cloud pricing
Quick Answer: n8n is free to self-host with unlimited workflows and executions. As of July 2026 the cloud version is $24/month (Starter, 2,500 executions, ~$20 annual), $60/month (Pro, 10,000 executions, ~$50 annual), and a new $800/month Business tier (40,000 executions, 30 concurrent, self-hosted option, ~$667 annual), with custom Enterprise. Self-hosting needs only a $5-20/month VPS, making n8n the most cost-effective automation tool for technical teams that can run their own infrastructure.
n8n Pricing Overview
n8n offers two deployment models with very different pricing: a free self-hosted option and a paid cloud service. That range, from $0 to enterprise pricing, makes it one of the most cost-flexible automation tools.
Self-Hosted n8n (Free)
The self-hosted version is available under a fair-code license at no cost. You run it on your own infrastructure (a VPS, Docker container, or Kubernetes cluster) and get:
- Unlimited workflows — no caps on the number of automations
- Unlimited executions — no per-task or per-operation charges
- All integration nodes — the same node library as cloud
- Full code access — JavaScript and Python within workflow nodes
- Community support — active forum and Discord
The only costs are infrastructure (a $5-20/month VPS suits most use cases) and the time to maintain the installation.
Cloud-Hosted n8n Pricing (July 2026)
| Plan | Price | Annual (effective) | Executions | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $24/month | ~$20/month | 2,500/month | 5 active workflows, basic support |
| Pro | $60/month | ~$50/month | 10,000/month | Unlimited active workflows, execution debugging, global variables |
| Business | $800/month | ~$667/month | 40,000/month | 30 concurrent executions, 6 shared projects, 30-day insights, self-hosted option |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom | SSO/SAML, admin panel, 200+ concurrent, SLA, dedicated support |
The Business tier ($800/month) is the 2026 addition, sitting between Pro and Enterprise for teams that need higher execution volume, concurrency, and a self-hosted option without a full Enterprise contract. Annual billing runs about 17% cheaper on Starter and Pro. Additional executions are available at pay-as-you-go rates.
Self-Hosted vs Cloud: When to Choose Each
Choose Self-Hosted When:
- The team has DevOps resources to manage infrastructure
- You need unlimited executions at zero marginal cost
- Data residency or air-gapped environments are required
Choose Cloud When:
- You prefer zero-maintenance managed hosting
- You need automatic updates and scaling
- The team lacks infrastructure-management skills
n8n vs Competitors on Price
| Platform | Free Tier | 10,000 tasks/month | Self-Hosted |
|---|---|---|---|
| n8n | Unlimited (self-hosted) | $60/month (cloud) | Yes (free) |
| Zapier | 100 tasks/month | from $29.99/month | No |
| Make | 1,000 credits/month | ~$32.83/month | No |
| Activepieces | Unlimited (self-hosted) | ~$25/month (cloud) | Yes (free) |
n8n's self-hosted model makes it the most cost-effective option for teams running thousands of executions per month. On cloud, Make offers lower per-operation pricing, but n8n's unlimited workflow count and code flexibility suit complex use cases.
Editor's Note: Across ShadowGen n8n work in 2024-26, the honest version of self-hosted-versus-Cloud is a staffing question, not a pricing one. Self-hosting removes per-execution billing entirely: on a single 2 vCPU / 4 GB node we have run low-thousands of executions a day for the cost of the VPS, an order of magnitude under the equivalent Cloud plan. What that price hides is who patches it, backs it up, and prunes old execution data — roughly half a day a month of someone's time once monitoring is counted. Re-checked July 2026: the new Cloud Business tier ($800/mo, 40,000 executions, self-hosted option) is aimed exactly at teams that have outgrown Pro's 10,000 executions but do not want a full Enterprise contract. If no one will own maintenance, Cloud's metered billing is still cheaper than the engineering hours self-hosting costs. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
n8n
Workflow automation for technical teams
Workflow AutomationZapier
Automate workflows between apps without coding—connect 9,000+ tools with simple, reliable automation.
Workflow AutomationMake
Automate your work with visual workflow builder and AI agents
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Dive Deeper
Client Portals vs Workflow Orchestration Platforms: What Changes When External Parties Act Inside a Process
What changes when a client or supplier has to act inside your process, not just watch it? This guide compares four client portals with four orchestration platforms on how outsiders get in, whether you pay for them and what the audit log records, from vendor sources read 14 and 15 September 2026.
Moxo vs Zapier in 2026: Human Approval Steps, External Participants and Pricing
Moxo and Zapier both put a person in front of an automated decision, from opposite ends: Moxo builds the process out of human steps and attaches AI, while Zapier pauses an automation for a reviewer through its Human in the Loop app. This guide compares approvers, rejection, AI approval, audit logs, governance and pricing, verified 14 and 15 September 2026.
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.