How much does n8n cost? Self-hosted vs cloud pricing
Quick Answer: n8n is free to self-host with unlimited workflows and executions. As of July 2026 the cloud version is $24/month (Starter, 2,500 executions, ~$20 annual), $60/month (Pro, 10,000 executions, ~$50 annual), and a new $800/month Business tier (40,000 executions, 30 concurrent, self-hosted option, ~$667 annual), with custom Enterprise. Self-hosting needs only a $5-20/month VPS, making n8n the most cost-effective automation tool for technical teams that can run their own infrastructure.
n8n Pricing Overview
n8n offers two deployment models with very different pricing: a free self-hosted option and a paid cloud service. That range, from $0 to enterprise pricing, makes it one of the most cost-flexible automation tools.
Self-Hosted n8n (Free)
The self-hosted version is available under a fair-code license at no cost. You run it on your own infrastructure (a VPS, Docker container, or Kubernetes cluster) and get:
- Unlimited workflows — no caps on the number of automations
- Unlimited executions — no per-task or per-operation charges
- All integration nodes — the same node library as cloud
- Full code access — JavaScript and Python within workflow nodes
- Community support — active forum and Discord
The only costs are infrastructure (a $5-20/month VPS suits most use cases) and the time to maintain the installation.
Cloud-Hosted n8n Pricing (July 2026)
| Plan | Price | Annual (effective) | Executions | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $24/month | ~$20/month | 2,500/month | 5 active workflows, basic support |
| Pro | $60/month | ~$50/month | 10,000/month | Unlimited active workflows, execution debugging, global variables |
| Business | $800/month | ~$667/month | 40,000/month | 30 concurrent executions, 6 shared projects, 30-day insights, self-hosted option |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom | SSO/SAML, admin panel, 200+ concurrent, SLA, dedicated support |
The Business tier ($800/month) is the 2026 addition, sitting between Pro and Enterprise for teams that need higher execution volume, concurrency, and a self-hosted option without a full Enterprise contract. Annual billing runs about 17% cheaper on Starter and Pro. Additional executions are available at pay-as-you-go rates.
Self-Hosted vs Cloud: When to Choose Each
Choose Self-Hosted When:
- The team has DevOps resources to manage infrastructure
- You need unlimited executions at zero marginal cost
- Data residency or air-gapped environments are required
Choose Cloud When:
- You prefer zero-maintenance managed hosting
- You need automatic updates and scaling
- The team lacks infrastructure-management skills
n8n vs Competitors on Price
| Platform | Free Tier | 10,000 tasks/month | Self-Hosted |
|---|---|---|---|
| n8n | Unlimited (self-hosted) | $60/month (cloud) | Yes (free) |
| Zapier | 100 tasks/month | from $29.99/month | No |
| Make | 1,000 credits/month | ~$32.83/month | No |
| Activepieces | Unlimited (self-hosted) | ~$25/month (cloud) | Yes (free) |
n8n's self-hosted model makes it the most cost-effective option for teams running thousands of executions per month. On cloud, Make offers lower per-operation pricing, but n8n's unlimited workflow count and code flexibility suit complex use cases.
Editor's Note: Across ShadowGen n8n work in 2024-26, the honest version of self-hosted-versus-Cloud is a staffing question, not a pricing one. Self-hosting removes per-execution billing entirely: on a single 2 vCPU / 4 GB node we have run low-thousands of executions a day for the cost of the VPS, an order of magnitude under the equivalent Cloud plan. What that price hides is who patches it, backs it up, and prunes old execution data — roughly half a day a month of someone's time once monitoring is counted. Re-checked July 2026: the new Cloud Business tier ($800/mo, 40,000 executions, self-hosted option) is aimed exactly at teams that have outgrown Pro's 10,000 executions but do not want a full Enterprise contract. If no one will own maintenance, Cloud's metered billing is still cheaper than the engineering hours self-hosting costs. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
n8n
Workflow automation for technical teams
Workflow AutomationZapier
Automate workflows between apps without coding—connect 9,000+ tools with simple, reliable automation.
Workflow AutomationMake
Automate your work with visual workflow builder and AI agents
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9…
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two…
Dive Deeper
Moxo vs Gumloop in 2026: Texting the Client, or Building the Agent
Gumloop (founded 2023) builds AI agents a company's own staff run; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs processes that wait on people outside the company. Gumloop wins three rounds to two: the way in, per-tool gating and a priced overage. Moxo wins on…
Moxo vs Relay.app in 2026: Where Relay's Approval Workflows Can Go Next
Relay.app, founded in 2021, shut down in September 2026 and deleted every account, workflow and run history; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, is one destination for its human-in-the-loop users. Relay.app takes two rounds, Moxo one, and vendor risk is a draw…
Moxo vs Workato in 2026: The Integration Estate, or the Approval Inside It
Workato, founded in 2013, is an enterprise integration platform whose Workflow apps add human tasks to recipes; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, ships the human step itself. Workato wins three rounds to two: connector reach, change control and the way in…