How much does Moxo cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: Moxo's only published price is Team: $5,000 a year, billed annually with no monthly option, for 100 flows and $100 of AI a year with unlimited seats (moxo.com/pricing, 28 September 2026). Scale (500 flows and $500 of AI a year) and Enterprise are custom quotes. There is no free plan, no published overage rate and no stated trial length, and the dollar AI allowance has no published conversion to the credits Moxo's product logs.
Moxo sells flows, not seats, and publishes exactly one price.
| Plan | Price as shown | Flows | AI allowance | Seats |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | $5,000/yr, billed annually | 100 a year | $100 of AI a year | Unlimited |
| Scale | Custom quote | 500 a year | $500 of AI a year | Unlimited |
| Enterprise | Custom quote | Not stated | Not stated | Unlimited |
Source: moxo.com/pricing, monthly and yearly views, 15 September 2026.
What decides the bill: flows and dollars of AI a year
Two meters, and the pricing page defines neither. The flow is defined elsewhere: Moxo's Description of Services, read 15 September 2026, calls it "A single running instance of a Template, carrying its own data and status". In synthetic AutomationAtlas tests, a template's Flows counter rose by one the moment a flow started (14 and 15 September 2026). That doesn't establish how an invoice counts, but it is the question to put to sales: if a flow counts when it starts, every abandoned onboarding is a flow you paid for.
The AI meter is the more interesting one. The pricing page sells "$100 of AI/yr", yet the product still counts credits. On 15 September an audit row in our test read "13 credits consumed (ai credits)" for one AI extract step, and Moxo's API changelog, read 14 September 2026, describes reports that show AI spend "in credits, the unit you buy rather than our provider bill". Moxo publishes no conversion between the two. A dollar allowance plays well in a procurement meeting because it looks like a budget line with a ceiling, but until the credit rate is in writing it is a label, not a price. The builder's estimates move as well: on 14 September it showed "Est. $0.38 per run" for a four-step template before publishing, and $0.17 at a later reading with no step edited.
What free covers: no free plan is listed
There is no free tier to prototype on. As of 15 September 2026, moxo.com/pricing lists Team, Scale and Enterprise but no free plan, and its header links to "Request free trial" without stating a trial length. Treat the pilot as a sales conversation, and get the trial's flow and AI limits stated before you start building.
Metered overage: allowed by the Terms, unpriced on the page
This is where to slow the procurement down. Moxo's Terms and Conditions, read 15 September 2026, say "Service Fees may include one-time fees, subscription fees and overage fees", while moxo.com/pricing stated no overage rate that day. The contract allows a charge the price list doesn't show. Under the same Terms, a price change applies from "the next Subscription Term, which takes place at least sixty (60) days after the notice of the price change". That protects the fee you can see; it can't protect a rate nobody wrote down, so put the overage rate in the order form.
The test workspace's Billing panel was no help either. In AutomationAtlas testing on 26 August and 14 September 2026, it showed no plan name and read "Your plan is managed by Moxo's sales team".
Discounts and floors: Team is the only published price
Team sets the floor at "$5,000/yr" on moxo.com/pricing. The page showed "$500 /mo" in a monthly view on 15 September 2026; by 28 September 2026 that option had been withdrawn, leaving annual billing only. It continues a run of changes: Internet Archive captures record two restructurings between 7 August and 10 September 2026.
| Capture date | Plans | Team allowance |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026 | Free, Business, Pro, Enterprise | No Team plan |
| 26 Aug 2026 | Team, Scale, Enterprise | 250 flows and 25,000 AI credits a year |
| 10 Sep 2026 | Team, Scale, Enterprise | 100 flows and $100 of AI a year |
At the unchanged $5,000 a year, the price per included flow at full use went from $20 on the August terms to $50 now, and the most a team can launch without running out before year end fell from about 21 flows a month to about 8 (AutomationAtlas arithmetic from the dated list prices). The AI allowance changed units in the same move. The fee held and the allowance moved, so if you buy, fix the allowance for the term in the contract, not just the fee.
How it compares: Team fits poorly at low volume or without human steps
Per-flow pricing is a bet on volume. At Team's "$5,000/yr" (moxo.com/pricing, 15 September 2026), 100 flows work out at $50 each, and an organisation running 20 flows a year would pay $250 per flow (AutomationAtlas arithmetic). The other side of the ledger is seats: all three plans list unlimited seats, so adding clients, partners or contractors to a flow doesn't raise the bill. Volume beyond 100 flows a year cannot be costed from public sources, and the page lists triggers, webhooks and REST APIs only from Scale, a custom quote.
The meter also shapes design. When every run costs money and seats are free, there is a quiet incentive to cram a whole client relationship into one long flow instead of several clean ones. Decide the process model first, then check it against the meter, not the other way round.
Editor's Note: The number that stuck with me wasn't the $5,000. When we recently built a synthetic four-step template, the builder showed "Est. $0.38 per run" before we had published anything, and a later look showed $0.17 with no step changed. A live cost estimate is genuinely useful, and I'd rather have one than not. But it is quoted in dollars while the audit log counts credits, and Moxo publishes no rate between them, so a buyer can't turn that badge into a budget. The caveat: one template, a workspace that isn't a Team plan, and we never learned why the estimate moved, so get the credit rate from Moxo in writing before you plan against it. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
Moxo
Process orchestration for cross-company work: AI prepares the steps, people sign them off, outsiders join by link
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9, Kissflow 5.8 and ServiceNow 4.8, scored 22 September 2026 on the five weighted criteria. Those criteria cover the step type, the approver's account or licence, the routes available on a rejection, the audit record, and the meter that charges for the decision, and none of them can tell a review from a rubber stamp, so the methodology adds a check readers can run on any product in a few minutes: whether the decision record tells a considered approval from an instant one. Every figure was read from a vendor-owned surface and carries its own date.
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Dive Deeper
Moxo vs Lindy in 2026: Who Presses Approve When the Agent Asks
Lindy, founded in 2023, sells an AI teammate that lives in Slack and in each person's inbox; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs multi-party processes where approvals are steps only a person can close. Moxo wins three rounds to two: who closes the step, work across companies and the record. Lindy wins reach and testing. Vendor pages and docs read 28 September 2026.
Moxo vs Kissflow in 2026: What an Outside Approver Costs, and What the Record Proves
Moxo and Kissflow both sell approvals to people who do not write code, and each wins one round outright: Moxo's Web and Headless SDKs run the approval inside the buyer's own product, under the buyer's own sign-in. Kissflow's portal audit log stamps every event with an actor, a device and an IP, where Moxo publishes no field list. Both answers are quoted, not priced, and both meters punish a one-step request sent to hundreds of clients. Cost, the decision record, rejection routes, AI metering and governance, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.
Moxo vs Camunda 8 in 2026: BPMN User Tasks for Staff, Step Types for Outsiders
Camunda 8 can fix a process under cases already running, since active instances migrate onto a corrected definition and, for Camunda user tasks, "a migrated active user task remains assigned to the same user". Moxo keeps the shared queue that Camunda's Tasklist V2 stops evaluating, with desks that are "a shared inbox that multiple users can pick work from". Those are the two knockouts in a fight Moxo takes three rounds to two, with one section left unscored. Portability, AI review gates and a published price decide the rest, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.