How much does Bardeen cost in 2026?

Quick Answer: Bardeen uses credit-based, additive pricing (verified July 2026): every user always gets 100 credits/month free, and paid plans add credits on top — Basic $10/month (+100 credits), Premium $50/month or $480/year (+1,000 credits, 20% off annually), and custom Enterprise. Credits are only consumed on successful runs (building and testing is free), and plans are not per-seat — team members are unlimited. Roughly one credit per row/standard action, more for AI enrichment.

Pricing Overview

Bardeen is a browser-based automation and AI-agent tool (a Chrome extension) that uses a credit-based, additive model. Every user always has a free 100 credits per month, and paid plans add more on top — there is no per-seat charge.

Bardeen Pricing Tiers (as of July 2026)

Tier Price Credits Notes
Free $0 100/month (always) Unused credits expire each period; unlimited free testing/building
Basic $10/month +100/month Premium scrapers, enrichment, teams
Premium $50/month ($480/year, 20% off) +1,000/month Everything in Basic, higher allowance
Enterprise Custom (annual) Custom bulk Custom scrapers built + maintained by Bardeen, premium support

The 2026 lineup is Free / Basic / Premium / Enterprise — the older "Professional $10 / Business $15/user" tier names no longer exist. Credits are additive: the paid plans add their allowance on top of the always-free 100, and pricing is not per-seat, so teams have unlimited members.

How credits work

Credits are consumed only on successful runs — building and testing automations is free. A standard action (scraping a row) is roughly one credit, while AI enrichment costs more (about three credits per action), so AI-heavy playbooks deplete an allowance faster than basic scraping. Bardeen remains a Chrome-only extension, which limits adoption on Firefox, Safari, or Edge.

How Bardeen pricing compares

Bardeen sits between web-scraping tools and general automation platforms. For sales-specific browser automation, Basic at $10/month undercuts alternatives like PhantomBuster or Clay, at the cost of a narrower, browser-focused feature set rather than full API-driven automation.

Editor's Note: We deployed Bardeen for a 5-person outbound sales team doing LinkedIn prospecting and CRM data entry. The credit meter was the whole story: AI enrichment actions burned credits far faster than basic scraping, so the practical cost landed above the sticker price once we topped up. Re-checked July 2026: the tiers are now Free / Basic $10 / Premium $50 (with a much larger +1,000-credit allowance), and because credits are additive and not per-seat, the right move for an AI-heavy team is one Premium plan rather than several Basic seats — model your credit burn on the enrichment actions, because that is what sets the real bill. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen

Related Questions

Written & reviewed by · Last updated:

Related Tools

Activepieces

No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features

Workflow Automation

Automatisch

Open-source Zapier alternative

Workflow Automation

Bardeen

AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension

Workflow Automation

Calendly

Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.

Workflow Automation

Related Rankings

Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026

A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.

Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026

A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.

Dive Deeper

comparison

QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent

QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.

case-study

Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown

Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.

comparison

Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared

Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.