How much does Bardeen cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: Bardeen uses credit-based, additive pricing (verified July 2026): every user always gets 100 credits/month free, and paid plans add credits on top — Basic $10/month (+100 credits), Premium $50/month or $480/year (+1,000 credits, 20% off annually), and custom Enterprise. Credits are only consumed on successful runs (building and testing is free), and plans are not per-seat — team members are unlimited. Roughly one credit per row/standard action, more for AI enrichment.
Pricing Overview
Bardeen is a browser-based automation and AI-agent tool (a Chrome extension) that uses a credit-based, additive model. Every user always has a free 100 credits per month, and paid plans add more on top — there is no per-seat charge.
Bardeen Pricing Tiers (as of July 2026)
| Tier | Price | Credits | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 100/month (always) | Unused credits expire each period; unlimited free testing/building |
| Basic | $10/month | +100/month | Premium scrapers, enrichment, teams |
| Premium | $50/month ($480/year, 20% off) | +1,000/month | Everything in Basic, higher allowance |
| Enterprise | Custom (annual) | Custom bulk | Custom scrapers built + maintained by Bardeen, premium support |
The 2026 lineup is Free / Basic / Premium / Enterprise — the older "Professional $10 / Business $15/user" tier names no longer exist. Credits are additive: the paid plans add their allowance on top of the always-free 100, and pricing is not per-seat, so teams have unlimited members.
How credits work
Credits are consumed only on successful runs — building and testing automations is free. A standard action (scraping a row) is roughly one credit, while AI enrichment costs more (about three credits per action), so AI-heavy playbooks deplete an allowance faster than basic scraping. Bardeen remains a Chrome-only extension, which limits adoption on Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
How Bardeen pricing compares
Bardeen sits between web-scraping tools and general automation platforms. For sales-specific browser automation, Basic at $10/month undercuts alternatives like PhantomBuster or Clay, at the cost of a narrower, browser-focused feature set rather than full API-driven automation.
Editor's Note: We deployed Bardeen for a 5-person outbound sales team doing LinkedIn prospecting and CRM data entry. The credit meter was the whole story: AI enrichment actions burned credits far faster than basic scraping, so the practical cost landed above the sticker price once we topped up. Re-checked July 2026: the tiers are now Free / Basic $10 / Premium $50 (with a much larger +1,000-credit allowance), and because credits are additive and not per-seat, the right move for an AI-heavy team is one Premium plan rather than several Basic seats — model your credit burn on the enrichment actions, because that is what sets the real bill. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
Bardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Dive Deeper
Client Portals vs Workflow Orchestration Platforms: What Changes When External Parties Act Inside a Process
What changes when a client or supplier has to act inside your process, not just watch it? This guide compares four client portals with four orchestration platforms on how outsiders get in, whether you pay for them and what the audit log records, from vendor sources read 14 and 15 September 2026.
Moxo vs Zapier in 2026: Human Approval Steps, External Participants and Pricing
Moxo and Zapier both put a person in front of an automated decision, from opposite ends: Moxo builds the process out of human steps and attaches AI, while Zapier pauses an automation for a reviewer through its Human in the Loop app. This guide compares approvers, rejection, AI approval, audit logs, governance and pricing, verified 14 and 15 September 2026.
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.