What does Activepieces cost in 2026? Pricing tiers and plans explained

Quick Answer: Activepieces offers a free, MIT-licensed self-hosted Community Edition. As of July 2026 the managed cloud Standard plan is free for up to 10 active flows and then bills $5 per active flow per month with unlimited runs — replacing the earlier task-based cloud tiers — while the Ultimate plan adds RBAC, SSO, audit logs, and compliance controls at custom annual pricing.

Pricing Overview

Activepieces is an open-source automation platform with a self-hosted Community Edition and a managed cloud service. In 2026 the cloud service moved from task-based tiers to per-active-flow pricing: the bill depends on how many flows are switched on, not how many times they run.

Activepieces Pricing (as of July 2026)

Option Price Notes
Community Edition (self-hosted) $0 MIT-licensed, core features, you host it
Standard (cloud) Free up to 10 active flows, then $5/month per active flow Unlimited runs, AI agents, unlimited MCP servers and tables
Ultimate (cloud) Custom, annual contract Projects, piece access controls, custom RBAC, SSO, audit logs, compliance controls

Per-active-flow billing

An active flow is a flow that is toggled on, regardless of how often it executes. Runs are unlimited on the cloud plans, so a flow that fires thousands of times a month costs the same as one that fires once. This replaces the task-counting cloud tiers Activepieces sold previously (a 1,000-task free tier, a $5 Pro tier, and a $20 Business tier); as of July 2026 the published model is per active flow.

Self-hosted Community Edition

The Community Edition is MIT-licensed with 270+ contributors and covers the core automation features: the visual flow builder, connector pieces, webhook and scheduled triggers, branching logic, and code steps. Self-hosting requires Docker and a PostgreSQL database. Governance features — SSO, audit logs, custom RBAC, compliance controls — are reserved for the Ultimate plan.

Hidden Costs and Considerations

  • Self-hosting infrastructure: the software is free, but a deployment needs a server. A basic $5-$10/month VPS handles moderate workloads; high-volume deployments may require $50-$100/month in infrastructure.
  • Flow-count discipline: on the cloud plan, cost scales with the number of active flows. Many small always-on flows cost more than the same workload consolidated into fewer flows.
  • Unlimited runs favour high volume: heavy execution volume adds nothing to the cloud bill, unlike task- or operation-metered competitors.
  • Connector ecosystem: Activepieces has fewer integrations than Zapier (9,000+ as of June 2026) or Make. Missing connectors can be built with the SDK, but that requires development effort.

How Activepieces Pricing Compares

A workspace running 10 or fewer active flows uses the Activepieces cloud free of charge with unlimited runs, which undercuts the metered entry plans of task- and operation-billed platforms (Zapier Professional from $29.99/month; Make from roughly $10.59/month for 10,000 operations). For volume-heavy, flow-light workloads the cloud plan is among the cheapest managed options; for workspaces with many small flows, per-flow billing can exceed operation-metered pricing. The self-hosted edition competes directly with n8n (also free self-hosted): Activepieces offers a simpler setup and a more modern UI, while n8n has a larger community and a deeper integration catalogue.

Editor's Note: We deployed self-hosted Activepieces for a 15-person marketing agency on a $6/month Hetzner VPS. The team runs 45 automation flows processing approximately 8,000 executions per month — lead capture from 6 client websites, CRM updates, Slack notifications, and social media scheduling. Annual infrastructure cost: $72. Under the current cloud model those 45 always-on flows would bill about $175/month for the 35 flows beyond the free allowance, so self-hosting remains the right call for flow-heavy setups like this one. The trade-off: the agency's one technical team member spends about 2 hours per month on maintenance (updates, monitoring). — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen

Related Questions

Written & reviewed by Rafal Fila · Last updated:

Related Tools

Related Rankings

Dive Deeper

comparison

Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas

Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.

comparison

QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent

QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.

case-study

Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown

Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.