What does Windmill cost in 2026? Pricing tiers and plans explained
Quick Answer: Windmill is free and open-source (AGPLv3): the self-hosted Community build has unlimited executions at no cost, and a free Cloud account is available (3 workspaces, 50 users). As of July 2026 the paid option is Enterprise, priced from about $120/month via a seat-plus-compute configurator — developer seats at $20/month, operator seats at $10/month, and compute units at $50 per worker per month (1 CU = 2 worker-GB-month). The old flat "Team $10/user" cloud tier was retired in the new model.
Pricing Overview
Windmill is an open-source developer platform (written in Rust) for building internal tools, workflows, and scripts in TypeScript, Python, Go, Bash, and SQL. It offers a free self-hosted build, a free Cloud account, and an Enterprise plan priced on seats plus compute.
Windmill Pricing (as of July 2026)
| Tier | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free & Open-source (self-hosted or Cloud) | $0 | Unlimited executions, all languages, app builder, scheduling, webhooks (AGPLv3) |
| Enterprise (Cloud or Self-hosted) | From $120/month | SSO/SAML, SCIM, audit logs, all advanced triggers, SOC 2 Type II, 24/7 support |
Windmill moved to a consolidated seat-plus-compute model. Enterprise now starts from $120/month and is configured from three components: developer seats at $20/month, operator (external/JWT) seats at $10/month, and compute units at $50 per worker per month (1 CU = 2 worker-GB-month; two standard workers = $100/month, agent workers = $0). The earlier flat "Team $10/user" tier no longer exists.
What each option includes
Free & Open-source
The Community build is AGPLv3 and includes the full workflow engine, script editor with LSP support, scheduling, webhooks, approval flows, and the app builder — with unlimited executions. The free tier (self-hosted or a free Cloud account) is capped at 3 workspaces, 50 users (10 with SSO), and 4 groups, without audit logs or the advanced event triggers (Kafka, NATS, SQS, GCP, Azure). Self-hosting uses Docker Compose or Kubernetes.
Enterprise
Enterprise (from $120/month, configured by seats and compute) adds SSO/SAML, SCIM with group sync, audit logs, all advanced triggers, a distributed S3 dependency cache, OpenTelemetry tracing, the commercial license, SOC 2 Type II, and 24/7 priority support with a 3-hour response SLA and a dedicated Slack channel.
Hidden costs and considerations
- Developer-focused: Windmill assumes familiarity with TypeScript, Python, or similar; non-technical users will find visual builders like Zapier or Make more approachable.
- Performance: the Rust engine runs compute-heavy scripts far faster than Node.js-based alternatives, but that advantage only matters for high-volume or compute-intensive workloads.
- AGPLv3: organisations embedding Windmill into a distributed commercial product may need the Enterprise (commercial) license to avoid AGPLv3 obligations.
How Windmill pricing compares
For self-hosted deployments both Windmill and n8n are free; Windmill offers stronger raw script performance while n8n provides a richer visual builder and larger connector library. Windmill's Enterprise pricing is a fraction of enterprise iPaaS tools like MuleSoft or Boomi.
Editor's Note: We deployed Windmill self-hosted for a fintech startup's data-engineering team (8 developers) running ~45,000 scripts/month for the cost of a $24/month Hetzner server. The Rust engine processed their heaviest pipeline (2M rows PostgreSQL→Snowflake) in 18 seconds versus 4 minutes on their previous n8n setup. Re-checked July 2026: Windmill's paid model is now seat-plus-compute (Enterprise from $120/month) rather than a flat $10/user, so for teams that need SSO and audit logs the price scales with developer seats and worker count — model both before committing. Self-hosting stays free and is still the right call if you have the DevOps capacity. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
Windmill
Build internal tools, workflows, and scripts with a visual flow builder and auto-generated UIs
Workflow Automationn8n
Workflow automation for technical teams
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationPipedream
Connect APIs, remarkably fast
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.
QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent
QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.