What does Windmill cost in 2026? Pricing tiers and plans explained
Quick Answer: Windmill is free and open-source (AGPLv3): the self-hosted Community build has unlimited executions at no cost, and a free Cloud account is available (3 workspaces, 50 users). As of July 2026 the paid option is Enterprise, priced from about $120/month via a seat-plus-compute configurator — developer seats at $20/month, operator seats at $10/month, and compute units at $50 per worker per month (1 CU = 2 worker-GB-month). The old flat "Team $10/user" cloud tier was retired in the new model.
Pricing Overview
Windmill is an open-source developer platform (written in Rust) for building internal tools, workflows, and scripts in TypeScript, Python, Go, Bash, and SQL. It offers a free self-hosted build, a free Cloud account, and an Enterprise plan priced on seats plus compute.
Windmill Pricing (as of July 2026)
| Tier | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free & Open-source (self-hosted or Cloud) | $0 | Unlimited executions, all languages, app builder, scheduling, webhooks (AGPLv3) |
| Enterprise (Cloud or Self-hosted) | From $120/month | SSO/SAML, SCIM, audit logs, all advanced triggers, SOC 2 Type II, 24/7 support |
Windmill moved to a consolidated seat-plus-compute model. Enterprise now starts from $120/month and is configured from three components: developer seats at $20/month, operator (external/JWT) seats at $10/month, and compute units at $50 per worker per month (1 CU = 2 worker-GB-month; two standard workers = $100/month, agent workers = $0). The earlier flat "Team $10/user" tier no longer exists.
What each option includes
Free & Open-source
The Community build is AGPLv3 and includes the full workflow engine, script editor with LSP support, scheduling, webhooks, approval flows, and the app builder — with unlimited executions. The free tier (self-hosted or a free Cloud account) is capped at 3 workspaces, 50 users (10 with SSO), and 4 groups, without audit logs or the advanced event triggers (Kafka, NATS, SQS, GCP, Azure). Self-hosting uses Docker Compose or Kubernetes.
Enterprise
Enterprise (from $120/month, configured by seats and compute) adds SSO/SAML, SCIM with group sync, audit logs, all advanced triggers, a distributed S3 dependency cache, OpenTelemetry tracing, the commercial license, SOC 2 Type II, and 24/7 priority support with a 3-hour response SLA and a dedicated Slack channel.
Hidden costs and considerations
- Developer-focused: Windmill assumes familiarity with TypeScript, Python, or similar; non-technical users will find visual builders like Zapier or Make more approachable.
- Performance: the Rust engine runs compute-heavy scripts far faster than Node.js-based alternatives, but that advantage only matters for high-volume or compute-intensive workloads.
- AGPLv3: organisations embedding Windmill into a distributed commercial product may need the Enterprise (commercial) license to avoid AGPLv3 obligations.
How Windmill pricing compares
For self-hosted deployments both Windmill and n8n are free; Windmill offers stronger raw script performance while n8n provides a richer visual builder and larger connector library. Windmill's Enterprise pricing is a fraction of enterprise iPaaS tools like MuleSoft or Boomi.
Editor's Note: We deployed Windmill self-hosted for a fintech startup's data-engineering team (8 developers) running ~45,000 scripts/month for the cost of a $24/month Hetzner server. The Rust engine processed their heaviest pipeline (2M rows PostgreSQL→Snowflake) in 18 seconds versus 4 minutes on their previous n8n setup. Re-checked July 2026: Windmill's paid model is now seat-plus-compute (Enterprise from $120/month) rather than a flat $10/user, so for teams that need SSO and audit logs the price scales with developer seats and worker count — model both before committing. Self-hosting stays free and is still the right call if you have the DevOps capacity. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
Windmill
Build internal tools, workflows, and scripts with a visual flow builder and auto-generated UIs
Workflow Automationn8n
Workflow automation for technical teams
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationPipedream
Connect APIs, remarkably fast
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9…
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two…
Dive Deeper
Moxo vs Gumloop in 2026: Texting the Client, or Building the Agent
Gumloop (founded 2023) builds AI agents a company's own staff run; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs processes that wait on people outside the company. Gumloop wins three rounds to two: the way in, per-tool gating and a priced overage. Moxo wins on…
Moxo vs Relay.app in 2026: Where Relay's Approval Workflows Can Go Next
Relay.app, founded in 2021, shut down in September 2026 and deleted every account, workflow and run history; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, is one destination for its human-in-the-loop users. Relay.app takes two rounds, Moxo one, and vendor risk is a draw…
Moxo vs Workato in 2026: The Integration Estate, or the Approval Inside It
Workato, founded in 2013, is an enterprise integration platform whose Workflow apps add human tasks to recipes; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, ships the human step itself. Workato wins three rounds to two: connector reach, change control and the way in…