Torq vs Tines: which SOAR platform is better in 2026?
Quick Answer: Torq (founded 2020, NYC/Tel Aviv) is a hyper-automation SOAR with 350+ integrations and quote-based enterprise pricing, suited to cloud-native security operations. Tines (founded 2018, Dublin/Boston) is a no-code workflow platform with 500+ integrations, a free Community Edition, and self-host options, suited to teams that prefer HTTP-first integration and gradual ramp-up.
Torq vs Tines: Direct Comparison
Torq and Tines are the two leading no-code SOAR platforms competing for the modern security operations center. Both reject the heavyweight code-heavy SOAR stacks of the previous generation in favor of visual workflow building.
Founders and Lineage
Torq (2020) was founded by Ofer Smadari, Eldad Livni, and Leonid Belkind from cloud-security backgrounds. Tines (2018) was founded by Eoin Hinchy and Thomas Kinsella from in-house security operations at DocuSign.
Integrations
Torq ships 350+ integrations as of 2026 with strong cloud-native event sources. Tines ships 500+ integrations and emphasizes generic HTTP and webhook actions as primitives.
Pricing
Torq is quote-based ($40K-$200K+/year typical) with a Hyperautomation Starter free tier for evaluation. Tines publishes a free Community Edition (3 stories, no expiration) and quotes paid plans in the $30K-$150K+/year range for typical security teams.
Deployment
Torq is SaaS-only with on-prem connectors via Torq Runners. Tines is SaaS by default with a Self-Hosted option (Tines Runner) for data sovereignty and air-gap deployments.
When Each Wins
Torq wins for cloud-native security operations, hyper-automation use cases spanning security/IT/engineering, and enterprise sales engagements. Tines wins for smaller teams that benefit from the Community Edition during ramp-up, organizations needing self-hosted runtime, and security engineers comfortable with HTTP-first integration.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Tines
No-code security automation and SOAR platform
Workflow AutomationTorq
No-code SOAR and security hyperautomation platform for SOC, MDR, and security engineering teams.
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9…
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two…
Dive Deeper
Moxo vs Gumloop in 2026: Texting the Client, or Building the Agent
Gumloop (founded 2023) builds AI agents a company's own staff run; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs processes that wait on people outside the company. Gumloop wins three rounds to two: the way in, per-tool gating and a priced overage. Moxo wins on…
Moxo vs Relay.app in 2026: Where Relay's Approval Workflows Can Go Next
Relay.app, founded in 2021, shut down in September 2026 and deleted every account, workflow and run history; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, is one destination for its human-in-the-loop users. Relay.app takes two rounds, Moxo one, and vendor risk is a draw…
Moxo vs Workato in 2026: The Integration Estate, or the Approval Inside It
Workato, founded in 2013, is an enterprise integration platform whose Workflow apps add human tasks to recipes; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, ships the human step itself. Workato wins three rounds to two: connector reach, change control and the way in…