Torq vs Tines: which SOAR platform is better in 2026?
Quick Answer: Torq (founded 2020, NYC/Tel Aviv) is a hyper-automation SOAR with 350+ integrations and quote-based enterprise pricing, suited to cloud-native security operations. Tines (founded 2018, Dublin/Boston) is a no-code workflow platform with 500+ integrations, a free Community Edition, and self-host options, suited to teams that prefer HTTP-first integration and gradual ramp-up.
Torq vs Tines: Direct Comparison
Torq and Tines are the two leading no-code SOAR platforms competing for the modern security operations center. Both reject the heavyweight code-heavy SOAR stacks of the previous generation in favor of visual workflow building.
Founders and Lineage
Torq (2020) was founded by Ofer Smadari, Eldad Livni, and Leonid Belkind from cloud-security backgrounds. Tines (2018) was founded by Eoin Hinchy and Thomas Kinsella from in-house security operations at DocuSign.
Integrations
Torq ships 350+ integrations as of 2026 with strong cloud-native event sources. Tines ships 500+ integrations and emphasizes generic HTTP and webhook actions as primitives.
Pricing
Torq is quote-based ($40K-$200K+/year typical) with a Hyperautomation Starter free tier for evaluation. Tines publishes a free Community Edition (3 stories, no expiration) and quotes paid plans in the $30K-$150K+/year range for typical security teams.
Deployment
Torq is SaaS-only with on-prem connectors via Torq Runners. Tines is SaaS by default with a Self-Hosted option (Tines Runner) for data sovereignty and air-gap deployments.
When Each Wins
Torq wins for cloud-native security operations, hyper-automation use cases spanning security/IT/engineering, and enterprise sales engagements. Tines wins for smaller teams that benefit from the Community Edition during ramp-up, organizations needing self-hosted runtime, and security engineers comfortable with HTTP-first integration.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Tines
No-code security automation and SOAR platform
Workflow AutomationTorq
No-code SOAR and security hyperautomation platform for SOC, MDR, and security engineering teams.
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.
QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent
QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.