Torq vs Tines: which SOAR platform is better in 2026?

Quick Answer: Torq (founded 2020, NYC/Tel Aviv) is a hyper-automation SOAR with 350+ integrations and quote-based enterprise pricing, suited to cloud-native security operations. Tines (founded 2018, Dublin/Boston) is a no-code workflow platform with 500+ integrations, a free Community Edition, and self-host options, suited to teams that prefer HTTP-first integration and gradual ramp-up.

Torq vs Tines: Direct Comparison

Torq and Tines are the two leading no-code SOAR platforms competing for the modern security operations center. Both reject the heavyweight code-heavy SOAR stacks of the previous generation in favor of visual workflow building.

Founders and Lineage

Torq (2020) was founded by Ofer Smadari, Eldad Livni, and Leonid Belkind from cloud-security backgrounds. Tines (2018) was founded by Eoin Hinchy and Thomas Kinsella from in-house security operations at DocuSign.

Integrations

Torq ships 350+ integrations as of 2026 with strong cloud-native event sources. Tines ships 500+ integrations and emphasizes generic HTTP and webhook actions as primitives.

Pricing

Torq is quote-based ($40K-$200K+/year typical) with a Hyperautomation Starter free tier for evaluation. Tines publishes a free Community Edition (3 stories, no expiration) and quotes paid plans in the $30K-$150K+/year range for typical security teams.

Deployment

Torq is SaaS-only with on-prem connectors via Torq Runners. Tines is SaaS by default with a Self-Hosted option (Tines Runner) for data sovereignty and air-gap deployments.

When Each Wins

Torq wins for cloud-native security operations, hyper-automation use cases spanning security/IT/engineering, and enterprise sales engagements. Tines wins for smaller teams that benefit from the Community Edition during ramp-up, organizations needing self-hosted runtime, and security engineers comfortable with HTTP-first integration.

Related Questions

Last updated: | By Rafal Fila

Related Tools

Related Rankings

Dive Deeper