Supabase vs Firebase: which backend is better in 2026?

Quick Answer: Supabase is an open-source Postgres backend with pgvector, RLS, and self-host options from $25/month Pro, suited to apps needing relational data and AI/RAG. Firebase is a proprietary NoSQL backend on Google Cloud with strong mobile SDKs, suited to mobile-first realtime apps.

Supabase vs Firebase: Direct Comparison

Supabase (founded 2020, open-source, Postgres-based) and Firebase (Google, 2014, proprietary, Firestore-based) both offer backend-as-a-service but differ in data model, hosting, and lock-in.

Data Model

Supabase is PostgreSQL: relational tables, foreign keys, joins, transactions, full-text search, PostGIS, and pgvector for AI embeddings. Firebase Firestore is a document NoSQL store with collections of JSON-like documents and limited join support.

Hosting

Supabase Cloud runs on AWS in multiple regions; the open-source stack can self-host on any infrastructure. Firebase runs only on Google Cloud Platform with no self-host option.

Pricing (May 2026)

  • Supabase Free: 500 MB DB, 1 GB storage, 50K MAU; Pro: $25/month per project; Team: $599/month
  • Firebase Spark (free): 1 GB Firestore, 50K reads/day; Blaze: pay-as-you-go from $0.06/100K reads

AI and Vectors

Supabase pgvector supports HNSW indexes and works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, and open-source embeddings. Firebase Vertex AI integration ties to Google AI services with Firestore vector search in preview.

Vendor Lock-In

Supabase data migrates via pg_dump to any Postgres host. Firestore migration requires custom export-and-transform code, and Firebase SDKs tightly couple client code to the platform.

When Each Wins

Supabase wins for relational data, AI/RAG workloads, EU data residency, and teams that want self-host as an option. Firebase wins for mobile-first apps, real-time collaborative features using Firestore listeners, and teams already invested in Google Cloud.

Related Questions

Written & reviewed by Rafal Fila · Last updated:

Related Tools

Related Rankings

Dive Deeper

comparison

Frends vs MuleSoft in 2026: Process Metering, Mule Credits and What They Do to Your Architecture

Frends and MuleSoft both run integrations in their cloud or inside yours, but they bill for different things, and that difference will shape your architecture more than any feature list. Frends counts deployed processes and runs on .NET; MuleSoft sells annual packages of Mule Credits drawn down by usage. We compared them from public sources read on 14 and 15 September 2026.

guide

How to turn a no-API portal into a REST endpoint

Public portals that will never ship a developer API are usually scraped, badly, by code coupled to their HTML. There is a more durable method: recover the wire format the portal's own front end already speaks, and call that instead. This guide sets out the method AutomationAtlas used against a Polish court-auction portal and a US county parcel portal, the five checks worth running before trusting what comes back, and what changes when the target is old enough to have no front end worth reading.

comparison

Workato vs Zapier in 2026: Enterprise iPaaS vs Tiered No-Code Automation

Workato and Zapier are two of the most widely shortlisted platforms for connecting ten or more business systems. Workato, founded in 2013, is a quote-priced enterprise iPaaS built on environment-promoted recipes and 1,200+ deep connectors; Zapier, founded in 2011, is a self-serve no-code platform spanning 9,000+ apps that also ships code steps, an SDK, and an MCP interface, and whose Team and Enterprise tiers add SSO, audit logs, and admin controls. This comparison covers execution architecture, connector depth, AI and MCP capabilities, published pricing, and tier-by-tier governance, verified against both vendors' official pages in July 2026.