Supabase vs Firebase: which backend is better in 2026?

Quick Answer: Supabase is an open-source Postgres backend with pgvector, RLS, and self-host options from $25/month Pro, suited to apps needing relational data and AI/RAG. Firebase is a proprietary NoSQL backend on Google Cloud with strong mobile SDKs, suited to mobile-first realtime apps.

Supabase vs Firebase: Direct Comparison

Supabase (founded 2020, open-source, Postgres-based) and Firebase (Google, 2014, proprietary, Firestore-based) both offer backend-as-a-service but differ in data model, hosting, and lock-in.

Data Model

Supabase is PostgreSQL: relational tables, foreign keys, joins, transactions, full-text search, PostGIS, and pgvector for AI embeddings. Firebase Firestore is a document NoSQL store with collections of JSON-like documents and limited join support.

Hosting

Supabase Cloud runs on AWS in multiple regions; the open-source stack can self-host on any infrastructure. Firebase runs only on Google Cloud Platform with no self-host option.

Pricing (May 2026)

  • Supabase Free: 500 MB DB, 1 GB storage, 50K MAU; Pro: $25/month per project; Team: $599/month
  • Firebase Spark (free): 1 GB Firestore, 50K reads/day; Blaze: pay-as-you-go from $0.06/100K reads

AI and Vectors

Supabase pgvector supports HNSW indexes and works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, and open-source embeddings. Firebase Vertex AI integration ties to Google AI services with Firestore vector search in preview.

Vendor Lock-In

Supabase data migrates via pg_dump to any Postgres host. Firestore migration requires custom export-and-transform code, and Firebase SDKs tightly couple client code to the platform.

When Each Wins

Supabase wins for relational data, AI/RAG workloads, EU data residency, and teams that want self-host as an option. Firebase wins for mobile-first apps, real-time collaborative features using Firestore listeners, and teams already invested in Google Cloud.

Related Questions

Last updated: | By Rafal Fila

Related Tools

Related Rankings

Dive Deeper