How much does Pipedream cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: As of October 2026, Pipedream's pricing page lists only Pipedream Connect plans: Free (development use only), Startup at $150/mo billed monthly or $99/mo billed annually with 10,000 usage credits and 100 external users included, and custom-priced Business. Pipedream Workflows, which used the credit-metered Basic ($29/mo billed annually) and Advanced ($49/mo billed annually) plans, no longer accepts signups or subscriptions and shuts down on 31 March 2027.
October 2026 update: Workflows shutdown and Connect-only pricing
As of October 2026, Pipedream's documentation states that Pipedream Workflows and String will shut down on 31 March 2027. Workflows no longer accepts signups or subscriptions, existing workflows keep running until that date, and Workflows data will be deleted by 30 April 2027. Pipedream Connect is not affected. The Free, Basic and Advanced rows in the June 2026 table below describe Workflows allowances that are no longer offered to new users.
| Plan (Pipedream Connect) | Price | Included |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Every feature in development; usage credits and external users limited to development |
| Startup | $150/mo, or $99/mo billed annually | 10,000 usage credits (then $0.012 per credit) and 100 external users (then $2 per user) |
| Business | Custom, billed annually | Volume pricing, SSO, SCIM, HIPAA, SLAs |
How Workflows credits worked (as of June 2026)
Pipedream is a developer-first integration platform, and unlike task- or operation-based tools it meters compute. As of June 2026, one credit equals 30 seconds of execution at 256 MB of memory, and credit cost scales with memory: a step configured at 1 GB consumes credits roughly four times as fast as the same step at 256 MB.
Former pricing tiers (as of June 2026)
| Plan | Price | Credits | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 100 credits/month | Entry tier |
| Basic | $45/mo, or $29/mo billed annually | 2,000 credits/month | Lowest paid tier |
| Advanced | $74/mo, or $49/mo billed annually | 2,000 credits/month | Includes 50M AI tokens |
| Connect | $150/mo, or $99/mo billed annually | 10,000 credits/month | Pipedream Connect in production, auth for 100 external users |
| Business | Custom | Unlimited | SSO/SAML, audit logging, SLAs |
The credit definition is the part to internalise, because it ties cost to how long a workflow runs, not how many steps it has.
Diagram source (Mermaid)
flowchart LR
A[Workflow step runs] --> B[Execution time x memory]
B --> C{1 credit = 30s at 256 MB}
C --> D[512 MB doubles the rate]
C --> E[1 GB quadruples the rate]
The cost trap: idle time still bills
Because credits track wall-clock compute, a step that sits waiting on a slow upstream API still burns credits the whole time it blocks. A workflow that calls a sluggish third-party endpoint synchronously, run a few thousand times a day, can consume most of a plan's daily credits doing nothing but waiting.
How Pipedream compares
Pipedream's compute model is unusual in the no-code category and is closest to a hosted serverless runtime with an integration layer on top. For fast API work it stretched a long way on the former Workflows free and Basic tiers; for non-technical operators a task-based tool like Zapier is simpler, and for teams that must keep execution in their own infrastructure, self-hosted n8n is the usual alternative.
Editor's Note: Across ShadowGen Pipedream builds in 2024-26, the credit model is honest but easy to misjudge. On one client integration a single 9-second upstream API call, run a few thousand times a day, quietly consumed most of a Basic plan's daily credits while the workflow sat idle waiting on the response. The fix that works: move slow or unreliable upstream calls behind a queue or a separate async workflow rather than blocking inside the main run. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
Pipedream
Connect APIs, remarkably fast
Workflow AutomationCeligo
iPaaS built for the NetSuite ecosystem with pre-built connectors
Integration PlatformsComposio
Agent-integration platform providing authenticated tool access to 1,000+ business applications
Integration PlatformsCyclr
Embedded iPaaS for SaaS vendors to ship a native integration marketplace inside their own product UI.
Integration PlatformsRelated Rankings
Best Data Integration Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of data integration platforms in 2026. The ranking covers ELT/ETL tools, customer data platforms, and enterprise iPaaS products that move data between operational systems and analytical destinations. Entries cover managed ELT (Fivetran, Airbyte, Stitch), customer…
Best Automation Tools for Fintech and Financial Services in 2026
Eight automation platforms are ranked here for banks, wealth managers and fintechs on five weighted criteria: security and compliance posture, data residency and key management, core-system integrations, audit and governance, and latency and throughput. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform…
Dive Deeper
Supergood vs UiPath in 2026: What Drives the Interface, and What You License
Supergood and UiPath answer the same problem, a system with no usable API. A UiPath robot drives the interface on every run; Supergood drives it once at authoring time and ships generated HTTP calls, so a redesign stops the robot while a backend change stops the endpoint…
Supergood vs Microsoft Power Automate in 2026: Bundled Desktop Flows Against Generated API Calls
Power Automate can automate a system with no API for nothing, on a licence many buyers already hold; Supergood publishes no price at all. In production a desktop flow replays recorded clicks every run while a Supergood integration ships generated HTTP calls, and the two combine…
Frends vs MuleSoft in 2026: Process Metering, Mule Credits and What They Do to Your Architecture
Frends and MuleSoft both run integrations in their cloud or inside yours, but they bill for different things, and that difference will shape your architecture more than any feature list. Frends counts deployed processes and runs on .NET; MuleSoft sells annual packages of Mule…