How much does Pabbly Connect cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: Pabbly Connect offers a free tier (100 tasks/month), paid plans starting at $16/month billed yearly ($194/year) for 10,000 tasks/month (July 2026), and lifetime deals from $249 one-time. All paid plans include unlimited workflows with no per-workflow charges. Annual billing reduces monthly plans by approximately 40%.
Pabbly Connect Pricing in 2026
Pabbly Connect uses a task-based pricing model with two distinctive features that set it apart from competitors: all paid plans include unlimited workflows (no per-workflow charges), and a lifetime pricing option eliminates recurring monthly costs entirely.
Free Tier
Pabbly Connect offers a free plan with 100 tasks per month and unlimited workflows. The free tier includes access to all 1,000+ integrations, multi-step workflows, conditional logic, and webhook support. This is sufficient for testing the platform but not for production use at any meaningful volume.
Monthly Plans (as of March 2026)
| Plan | Tasks/Month | Price (Monthly) | Price (Annual) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | 12,000 | $25/mo | $15/mo ($180/yr) |
| Pro | 24,000 | $41/mo | $25/mo ($300/yr) |
| Ultimate | 50,000 | $66/mo | $42/mo ($499/yr) |
All plans include unlimited workflows, unlimited active workflows, multi-step automations, conditional logic (if/else paths), filters, formatters, and access to all integrations. There are no per-workflow or per-connection charges.
Lifetime Deals
Pabbly Connect offers one-time lifetime purchases that eliminate recurring monthly costs:
| Plan | Tasks/Month | One-Time Price |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Lifetime | 12,000 | $249 |
| Pro Lifetime | 24,000 | $449 |
| Ultimate Lifetime | 50,000 | $699 |
Lifetime deals include all features of the corresponding monthly plan. The lifetime license is valid for the life of the product. Based on monthly pricing, the Standard lifetime deal breaks even at approximately 10 months on annual billing or 10 months on monthly billing.
How Task Counting Works
Pabbly Connect counts each step execution as one task. A workflow with 5 steps that runs once uses 5 tasks. A workflow that runs 100 times with 5 steps uses 500 tasks. Conditional paths that are not executed (because the condition is false) do not count as tasks. Failed steps count toward the task quota.
This per-step counting is broadly comparable to Zapier's model (which bills each data-moving action step but not triggers, filters, or built-in tools) and to Make's operations-based model.
Comparison to Zapier and Make Pricing
| Volume | Zapier | Make | Pabbly Connect |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 tasks/mo | ~$20-30/mo (entry plan) | $9/mo (Core) | Free |
| 10,000 tasks/mo | Higher Zapier tiers | $16/mo (Core) | $25/mo |
| 25,000 tasks/mo | Higher Zapier tiers | $29/mo (Core) | $41/mo |
| 50,000 tasks/mo | $448.50/mo (Team) | $82/mo (Pro) | $66/mo |
Note: Zapier counts per Zap run, while Pabbly and Make count per step/operation. A Zapier Zap with 5 steps uses 1 Zapier task but 5 Pabbly tasks. Adjust volumes accordingly when comparing.
What is Included
- Unlimited workflows on all plans
- 1,000+ app integrations
- Multi-step workflows
- Conditional logic (if/else)
- Filters and formatters
- Webhooks (incoming and outgoing)
- Scheduler triggers
- Email support (response time varies)
- Execution logs and history
Limitations
- Support response times average 48-72 hours (no live chat or phone support)
- Integration library (1,000+) is smaller than Zapier (9,000+) and Make (1,800+)
- No AI-powered workflow builder
- No built-in database or internal tools features
- Community and documentation less extensive than competitors
Related Questions
Related Tools
Pabbly Connect
Workflow automation platform with one-time lifetime deal pricing
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Dive Deeper
Client Portals vs Workflow Orchestration Platforms: What Changes When External Parties Act Inside a Process
What changes when a client or supplier has to act inside your process, not just watch it? This guide compares four client portals with four orchestration platforms on how outsiders get in, whether you pay for them and what the audit log records, from vendor sources read 14 and 15 September 2026.
Moxo vs Zapier in 2026: Human Approval Steps, External Participants and Pricing
Moxo and Zapier both put a person in front of an automated decision, from opposite ends: Moxo builds the process out of human steps and attaches AI, while Zapier pauses an automation for a reviewer through its Human in the Loop app. This guide compares approvers, rejection, AI approval, audit logs, governance and pricing, verified 14 and 15 September 2026.
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.