Can you use Tines for SOAR automation?
Quick Answer: Yes. Tines is a no-code security automation platform built for SOAR use cases, with production deployments at Canva, McKesson, and Databricks as of April 2026. Security teams use Tines Stories to automate phishing triage, SIEM alert enrichment, IOC lookups, and endpoint isolation.
Using Tines for SOAR Automation
Yes. Tines is designed and marketed as a no-code security automation platform used by security operations (SOC) teams for SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) workflows. As of April 2026, Tines customers include security teams at Canva, McKesson, Mars, and Databricks, and the platform is positioned directly against traditional SOAR vendors such as Splunk SOAR, Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, and IBM Resilient.
What Tines Automates for SOC Teams
Tines executes SOAR playbooks as Stories, which are directed graphs of Actions connected by event flow. Common SOC use cases include:
- Phishing triage: Parse reported phishing emails, extract headers and URLs, enrich indicators via VirusTotal or urlscan.io, and auto-respond to the reporter with the verdict
- SIEM alert enrichment: Pull alerts from Splunk, Sentinel, or Chronicle, enrich with threat intelligence (Recorded Future, MISP), and create tickets in Jira or ServiceNow only when the alert meets severity thresholds
- Endpoint isolation: Trigger CrowdStrike or SentinelOne host containment APIs when a rule fires, then notify the analyst and log the action for audit
- Indicator of compromise (IOC) enrichment: Cross-reference IPs, domains, and hashes against multiple threat intelligence feeds and update watch lists
- User access review automation: Pull entitlements from Okta or Azure AD on a schedule and generate manager review tickets
How Tines Differs From Traditional SOAR
Traditional SOAR products ship with hundreds of vendor-specific apps and scripted integrations. Tines instead treats every external system as an HTTP API and builds playbooks using six core Action types: HTTP Request, Send Email, IMAP, Trigger, Event Transform, and Webhook. This design reduces the surface area for maintenance (only six Action types to learn) but requires that analysts know how the target API works rather than relying on pre-packaged connectors.
Pricing and Deployment
Tines pricing as of April 2026 is custom-quoted, with entry-level Team plans starting at approximately $35,000 per year and Enterprise deployments running into six figures. Tines is deployed as a SaaS tenant by default; self-hosted and tenant-isolated options are available on Enterprise plans. The platform includes a free Community Edition with a cap on monthly stories and is widely used for personal security automation projects.
Limitations to Consider
Tines is optimized for API-driven automation. Organizations that rely heavily on legacy SOAR features such as deep case management, analyst shift handoff, or MITRE ATT&CK mapping typically pair Tines with a dedicated case-management tool (Jira, ServiceNow, or a SIEM-native case feature) rather than using Tines as a full incident response system.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Tines
No-code security automation and SOAR platform
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Dive Deeper
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.
QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent
QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.