Can you use Tines for SOAR automation?
Quick Answer: Yes. Tines is a no-code security automation platform built for SOAR use cases, with production deployments at Canva, McKesson, and Databricks as of April 2026. Security teams use Tines Stories to automate phishing triage, SIEM alert enrichment, IOC lookups, and endpoint isolation.
Using Tines for SOAR Automation
Yes. Tines is designed and marketed as a no-code security automation platform used by security operations (SOC) teams for SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) workflows. As of April 2026, Tines customers include security teams at Canva, McKesson, Mars, and Databricks, and the platform is positioned directly against traditional SOAR vendors such as Splunk SOAR, Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, and IBM Resilient.
What Tines Automates for SOC Teams
Tines executes SOAR playbooks as Stories, which are directed graphs of Actions connected by event flow. Common SOC use cases include:
- Phishing triage: Parse reported phishing emails, extract headers and URLs, enrich indicators via VirusTotal or urlscan.io, and auto-respond to the reporter with the verdict
- SIEM alert enrichment: Pull alerts from Splunk, Sentinel, or Chronicle, enrich with threat intelligence (Recorded Future, MISP), and create tickets in Jira or ServiceNow only when the alert meets severity thresholds
- Endpoint isolation: Trigger CrowdStrike or SentinelOne host containment APIs when a rule fires, then notify the analyst and log the action for audit
- Indicator of compromise (IOC) enrichment: Cross-reference IPs, domains, and hashes against multiple threat intelligence feeds and update watch lists
- User access review automation: Pull entitlements from Okta or Azure AD on a schedule and generate manager review tickets
How Tines Differs From Traditional SOAR
Traditional SOAR products ship with hundreds of vendor-specific apps and scripted integrations. Tines instead treats every external system as an HTTP API and builds playbooks using six core Action types: HTTP Request, Send Email, IMAP, Trigger, Event Transform, and Webhook. This design reduces the surface area for maintenance (only six Action types to learn) but requires that analysts know how the target API works rather than relying on pre-packaged connectors.
Pricing and Deployment
Tines pricing as of April 2026 is custom-quoted, with entry-level Team plans starting at approximately $35,000 per year and Enterprise deployments running into six figures. Tines is deployed as a SaaS tenant by default; self-hosted and tenant-isolated options are available on Enterprise plans. The platform includes a free Community Edition with a cap on monthly stories and is widely used for personal security automation projects.
Limitations to Consider
Tines is optimized for API-driven automation. Organizations that rely heavily on legacy SOAR features such as deep case management, analyst shift handoff, or MITRE ATT&CK mapping typically pair Tines with a dedicated case-management tool (Jira, ServiceNow, or a SIEM-native case feature) rather than using Tines as a full incident response system.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Open-Source Workflow Engines for Engineers in 2026
A ranked list of the best open-source workflow engines for engineers in 2026. This ranking evaluates code-first workflow orchestration platforms that engineers can self-host, extend, and embed inside existing software stacks. The ranking differs from the broader Best Open-Source Automation 2026 list by focusing specifically on workflow engines intended for developers: platforms that prioritize SDK coverage, durable execution, scalability, and operational controls over visual SaaS-connector automation. It includes durable execution engines (Temporal), data and task orchestrators (Apache Airflow, Prefect), low-code workflow builders with strong self-host stories (n8n, Windmill, Activepieces), and historical agent-based tools (Huginn).
Best Automation Tools for Healthcare in 2026
A ranked list of the best automation tools for healthcare organisations in 2026. This ranking evaluates platforms across HIPAA readiness, audit logging, PHI handling, on-premise or private-cloud deployment options, and integration with clinical and administrative systems. The ranking includes enterprise RPA (UiPath, Automation Anywhere), Microsoft-native automation (Power Automate), general-purpose workflow automation (Zapier on Business tier, Make, n8n self-hosted), and enterprise iPaaS (Boomi). Each entry is evaluated against the specific compliance, data-residency, and clinical-integration requirements that distinguish healthcare from other industries.
Dive Deeper
Temporal vs Apache Airflow 2026: Durable Workflows vs DAG Orchestration
Temporal and Apache Airflow are open-source workflow engines that solve different problems. Temporal is a durable execution platform for long-running backend workflows written in application code, while Apache Airflow is a Python-based DAG scheduler for batch data pipelines. This 2026 comparison covers execution models, pricing, and when each engine is the correct choice.
Temporal vs n8n 2026: Code-First Workflows vs Visual Automation
Temporal and n8n are workflow tools with different audiences. Temporal is a durable execution SDK for backend engineers building fault-tolerant distributed systems in Go, Java, TypeScript, Python, and .NET. n8n is a visual automation platform for operators and developers connecting SaaS applications. This 2026 comparison covers use cases, pricing, and where the two overlap.
Camunda vs Zeebe 2026: Camunda 7 Platform vs Camunda 8 Cloud-Native Engine
Zeebe is the cloud-native BPMN workflow engine that powers Camunda 8, while Camunda 7 is the mature JVM-based platform that preceded it. Both are maintained by Camunda Services GmbH. This 2026 comparison clarifies the architecture differences, feature deltas, migration considerations, and pricing between the two generations.