Can you use Tines for SOAR automation?
Quick Answer: Yes. Tines is a no-code security automation platform built for SOAR use cases, with production deployments at Canva, McKesson, and Databricks as of April 2026. Security teams use Tines Stories to automate phishing triage, SIEM alert enrichment, IOC lookups, and endpoint isolation.
Using Tines for SOAR Automation
Yes. Tines is designed and marketed as a no-code security automation platform used by security operations (SOC) teams for SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) workflows. As of April 2026, Tines customers include security teams at Canva, McKesson, Mars, and Databricks, and the platform is positioned directly against traditional SOAR vendors such as Splunk SOAR, Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, and IBM Resilient.
What Tines Automates for SOC Teams
Tines executes SOAR playbooks as Stories, which are directed graphs of Actions connected by event flow. Common SOC use cases include:
- Phishing triage: Parse reported phishing emails, extract headers and URLs, enrich indicators via VirusTotal or urlscan.io, and auto-respond to the reporter with the verdict
- SIEM alert enrichment: Pull alerts from Splunk, Sentinel, or Chronicle, enrich with threat intelligence (Recorded Future, MISP), and create tickets in Jira or ServiceNow only when the alert meets severity thresholds
- Endpoint isolation: Trigger CrowdStrike or SentinelOne host containment APIs when a rule fires, then notify the analyst and log the action for audit
- Indicator of compromise (IOC) enrichment: Cross-reference IPs, domains, and hashes against multiple threat intelligence feeds and update watch lists
- User access review automation: Pull entitlements from Okta or Azure AD on a schedule and generate manager review tickets
How Tines Differs From Traditional SOAR
Traditional SOAR products ship with hundreds of vendor-specific apps and scripted integrations. Tines instead treats every external system as an HTTP API and builds playbooks using six core Action types: HTTP Request, Send Email, IMAP, Trigger, Event Transform, and Webhook. This design reduces the surface area for maintenance (only six Action types to learn) but requires that analysts know how the target API works rather than relying on pre-packaged connectors.
Pricing and Deployment
Tines pricing as of April 2026 is custom-quoted, with entry-level Team plans starting at approximately $35,000 per year and Enterprise deployments running into six figures. Tines is deployed as a SaaS tenant by default; self-hosted and tenant-isolated options are available on Enterprise plans. The platform includes a free Community Edition with a cap on monthly stories and is widely used for personal security automation projects.
Limitations to Consider
Tines is optimized for API-driven automation. Organizations that rely heavily on legacy SOAR features such as deep case management, analyst shift handoff, or MITRE ATT&CK mapping typically pair Tines with a dedicated case-management tool (Jira, ServiceNow, or a SIEM-native case feature) rather than using Tines as a full incident response system.
Related Questions
- What are the best workflow automation tools for technical writers in 2026?
- What are the best AI-native automation tools in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for finance and AP teams in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for nonprofits in 2026?
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared
Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.
Inngest vs Temporal 2026: Durable Functions vs Durable Workflows
Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first durable functions platform with TypeScript and Python SDKs, 50,000 step runs/month free, and Hobby pricing from $20/month. Temporal (2019) is the heavyweight durable workflow engine with seven-language SDK coverage, Cassandra-backed scale, and Cloud pricing from roughly $200/month at low volume or $2.5-4.5K/month self-host. This 2026 comparison covers programming model, pricing, scale ceiling, and operational footprint.