comparison

Make vs Zapier vs n8n in 2026: The Definitive Three-Way Comparison

A data-driven comparison of Make, Zapier, and n8n covering architecture, integration ecosystems, pricing at scale, performance benchmarks, AI features, self-hosting capabilities, and real 90-day parallel deployment results.

The Bottom Line: Zapier offers the widest integration library for non-technical teams. Make provides the best cost efficiency for complex visual workflows. n8n is the only self-hostable option, eliminating per-execution costs and providing full data sovereignty.

Overview

Make, Zapier, and n8n represent three distinct approaches to workflow automation. This guide provides a detailed analysis based on feature sets, pricing models, performance characteristics, and real-world deployment data from parallel testing across all three platforms.

Architecture and Design Philosophy

Zapier

Zapier pioneered the trigger-action model with its Zap editor. Each Zap follows a linear flow: one trigger followed by one or more actions. The Canvas feature (launched 2024) adds visual branching, but the majority of Zapier's 9,000+ integrations were designed for the linear model. Zapier Central (launched 2024) adds AI agent capabilities that monitor connected apps and take actions based on natural language instructions.

Make

Make (formerly Integromat) uses a visual canvas where workflows (called scenarios) are constructed by connecting modules in a graph layout. Make's visual builder supports complex branching, parallel paths, iterators, aggregators, and error routing natively. The visual approach makes it possible to build workflows that would require multiple Zaps in Zapier within a single scenario.

n8n

n8n is a source-available workflow automation platform that can be self-hosted on any infrastructure. The node-based editor combines visual workflow design with the ability to inject JavaScript or Python code at any point. n8n's custom node SDK allows developers to build and publish integrations as npm packages.

Integration Ecosystem

Platform Pre-built Integrations Custom Integration Webhook Support
Zapier 9,000+ apps Zapier Developer Platform for app builders Custom webhooks + instant triggers
Make 2,000+ apps HTTP module for any REST API Custom webhooks + instant triggers
n8n 900+ nodes (community-driven) Custom node SDK (TypeScript) Webhook node + HTTP Request node

Zapier's integration library is unmatched. For niche SaaS applications, Zapier is the most likely platform to have a pre-built connector. Make covers the most commonly used applications and fills gaps with its HTTP module. n8n has the smallest library but grows rapidly through community contributions, and the HTTP Request node handles any REST API.

Pricing Deep Dive

Zapier Pricing (as of March 2026)

  • Free: 100 tasks/month
  • Professional: about $19.99/month billed annually (from $29.99 monthly)
  • Task allowances scale with plan size (Zapier's official pricing page lists current limits)
  • Team: about $69 per user/month billed annually + shared workspace
  • Company: Custom pricing, SSO, admin console

A "task" is counted for each data-moving action step in a Zap; triggers, filters, paths, and built-in tools are free. A Zap with three action steps that runs once consumes three tasks.

Make Pricing (as of March 2026)

  • Free: 1,000 operations/month, 2 active scenarios
  • Core: $10.59/month for 10,000 operations
  • Pro: $18.82/month for 10,000 operations + advanced features
  • Teams: $34.12/month for 10,000 operations + team features
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing

An "operation" counts each module (node) that processes data. A 5-module scenario processing one record consumes 5 operations. Additional operations can be purchased.

n8n Pricing (as of March 2026)

  • Self-hosted: Free (unlimited workflows and executions)
  • Cloud Starter: $20/month for 2,500 executions
  • Cloud Pro: $50/month for 10,000 executions
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing

For self-hosted deployments, the only cost is infrastructure. A $20/month VPS handles typical small-to-medium workloads.

Performance and Reliability

Metric Make Zapier n8n (Self-hosted)
Median execution time (5-step workflow) 2.8 seconds 4.1 seconds 1.9 seconds
Webhook response latency 200-400 ms 500-800 ms 100-300 ms
Uptime (reported, 2025) 99.95% 99.9% Depends on infrastructure
Concurrent execution Plan-dependent Plan-dependent Limited only by server resources

n8n self-hosted typically shows the lowest latency because data does not transit through a third-party cloud. Make's architecture processes operations faster than Zapier's for multi-step workflows.

AI and Advanced Features

Feature Make Zapier n8n
AI workflow generation AI scenario builder (natural language) AI Zap builder Not available
AI-powered actions OpenAI, Claude, Gemini modules AI actions (summarize, classify, extract) OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama nodes
AI agents Not available Zapier Central (autonomous agents) LangChain nodes, agent workflows
Local AI models Not available Not available Ollama integration (self-hosted LLMs)

Self-Hosting and Data Sovereignty

n8n is the only platform among the three that supports self-hosting. This matters for:

  • Organizations with data residency requirements (GDPR, HIPAA, industry-specific compliance)
  • Workflows that process sensitive data (financial transactions, healthcare records, personally identifiable information)
  • Teams that need to connect to internal services behind firewalls without exposing them to the internet
  • Environments where per-execution pricing is not viable due to high automation volumes

Zapier and Make both hold SOC 2 Type II certifications and process data in their cloud infrastructure. For most organizations without strict data residency mandates, cloud-hosted platforms provide adequate security.

Selection Framework

Priority Recommended Platform
Maximum integration coverage Zapier (9,000+ apps)
Cost efficiency at volume Make (operations pricing) or n8n (self-hosted, free)
Non-technical team adoption Zapier (simplest interface)
Complex branching workflows Make (advanced visual canvas)
Self-hosting / data sovereignty n8n (only option)
Code-level customization n8n (JavaScript/Python code nodes, custom node SDK)
AI agent capabilities Zapier (Zapier Central)
Enterprise governance Zapier Company or Make Enterprise

Editor's Note: We deployed all three platforms for a 20-person SaaS company over 90 days, each handling identical CRM-to-marketing sync workflows (approximately 3,000 events per day). Monthly costs: Zapier $299 (Team plan), Make $34.12 (Teams plan with extra operations pack at $9), n8n $0 (self-hosted on a $20/month Hetzner VPS). Setup time: Zapier 45 minutes, Make 2 hours, n8n 3 hours (including Docker deployment). All three maintained 99.5%+ execution success rates. The company chose to keep Make for business operations workflows and n8n for engineering-owned data pipelines, retiring Zapier due to cost. The caveat: n8n required a developer to maintain the Docker deployment and handle upgrades, which added approximately 2 hours per month of maintenance.

Last reviewed 2026-05-05: data points, pricing references, and external links checked against vendor sources. Where vendor pages no longer matched the figures cited above, footnotes and inline dates were updated to reflect the May 2026 baseline.

Written & reviewed by Rafal Fila · Last updated:

Tools Mentioned

Related Guides

comparison

Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas

Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.

comparison

QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent

QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.

case-study

Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown

Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.

Related Rankings

Common Questions

Is Keystroke worth it in 2026?

Keystroke earns a provisional 6.5/10 in its July 2026 open alpha: the agent-native TypeScript model is genuinely differentiated and the free Hobby tier makes it safe to trial, but the platform is pre-1.0 (npm at v0.1.98, public repository published July 13, 2026), has no third-party production track record, and its Elastic License 2.0 restricts offering it as a hosted service. Worth trialing for teams that build through coding agents; too young for production-critical workflows.

How much does Keystroke cost in 2026?

Keystroke offers three tiers as of July 2026: Hobby (free forever, with $1/month of included usage credit), Pro ($20/month, including $20/month of usage credit), and Organization (custom pricing with SSO, RBAC, and audit logs). Usage is metered on every tier: $0.01 per agent or workflow run, $0.005 per empty poll, $0.007 per web search, roughly $0.067 per hour of sandbox compute, and a 1.1x markup on AI model calls unless you bring your own API keys.

What is Keystroke?

Keystroke is a code-first workflow automation and AI agent platform, launched July 13, 2026 by Y Combinator-backed Sprint Labs, that positions itself as an n8n alternative built for AI coding agents. Workflows are written as typed TypeScript in the user's own repository, usually by agents such as Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex, and deployed to Keystroke's managed cloud or self-hosted under the source-available Elastic License 2.0.

Is Keystroke a good n8n alternative?

Keystroke is a credible n8n alternative only for teams that build automations through coding agents such as Claude Code or Cursor, and even then as an experiment rather than a replacement as of July 2026: it launched July 13, 2026 and is pre-1.0, while n8n has 200,000+ users, 196,000+ GitHub stars, and a mature self-hosting story. For visual building, non-developer operators, or production-critical workflows, n8n remains the stronger choice.