Building a First n8n Workflow: A Step-by-Step Tutorial
Step-by-step tutorial for building a GitHub-to-Slack notification workflow in n8n with conditional routing and logging.
The Bottom Line: A basic n8n workflow connecting a webhook trigger to a conditional branch and two output actions can be built and tested in under 30 minutes; n8n's visual canvas and built-in execution log make debugging straightforward for first-time users.
Building Your First n8n Workflow: A Step-by-Step Tutorial
n8n is a powerful workflow automation platform that gives teams visual building and code-level control in one tool. This tutorial walks you through building a first real workflow from scratch.
What We Will Build
We will create a workflow that monitors a GitHub repository for new issues and sends a formatted notification to a Slack channel with issue details. This is a practical, real-world automation that many development teams use.
Workflow Architecture
Here is the overall flow of our automation:
Diagram source (Mermaid)
flowchart TD
A[GitHub Trigger: New Issue Created] --> B[Extract Issue Details]
B --> C{Is it a bug?}
C -->|Yes| D[Format Bug Alert Message]
C -->|No| E[Format General Notification]
D --> F[Send to #bugs Slack Channel]
E --> G[Send to #general Slack Channel]
F --> H[Log to Google Sheet]
G --> H[Log to Google Sheet]
Prerequisites
Before starting, make sure you have:
- n8n installed either self-hosted (Docker recommended) or a cloud account at app.n8n.cloud
- GitHub account with a repository to monitor
- Slack workspace with permission to install apps
- Google account for the Google Sheets logging step (optional)
Step 1: Set Up the GitHub Trigger
Every n8n workflow starts with a trigger node. This is the event that kicks off the automation.
- Open n8n and click Add workflow
- Click the + button to add a first node
- Search for GitHub Trigger and select it
- Click Create new credential and authenticate with your GitHub account
- Configure the trigger:
- Repository Owner: your GitHub username or organization
- Repository Name: the repo organizations want to monitor
- Events: select Issues and check opened
- Click Listen for Test Event and create a test issue in your repo to capture sample data
The trigger node will now fire every time a new issue is created in your repository.
Step 2: Extract and Transform Issue Data
Add a Set node to extract the fields we need:
- Click + after the GitHub Trigger node
- Add a Set node
- Configure the following fields:
- title:
{{ $json.issue.title }} - body:
{{ $json.issue.body }} - author:
{{ $json.issue.user.login }} - url:
{{ $json.issue.html_url }} - labels:
{{ $json.issue.labels.map(l => l.name).join(", ") }} - is_bug:
{{ $json.issue.labels.some(l => l.name === "bug") }}
- title:
This step normalizes the GitHub webhook data into a clean format for the rest of the workflow.
Step 3: Add Conditional Routing
We want bug reports to go to a dedicated channel. Add an IF node:
- Click + after the Set node
- Add an IF node
- Set the condition: is_bug equals true
- This creates two output branches: true (bugs) and false (other issues)
Step 4: Configure Slack Notifications
Add two Slack nodes, one for each branch:
Bug Alert (True branch)
- Click + on the true output
- Add a Slack node
- Connect your Slack workspace credential
- Configure:
- Channel: #bugs (or your bug channel)
- Message Text: Format a rich message:
:bug: *New Bug Report*
*Title:* {{ $json.title }}
*Author:* {{ $json.author }}
*Labels:* {{ $json.labels }}
*Link:* {{ $json.url }}
{{ $json.body }}
General Notification (False branch)
- Click + on the false output
- Add another Slack node
- Configure similarly but send to #general with a different emoji:
:clipboard: *New Issue*
*Title:* {{ $json.title }}
*Author:* {{ $json.author }}
*Link:* {{ $json.url }}
Step 5: Log to Google Sheets (Optional)
Add a Google Sheets node after both Slack nodes to maintain a log:
- Add a Merge node to combine both branches
- Add a Google Sheets node
- Connect your Google account
- Select the spreadsheet and worksheet
- Map columns: Date, Title, Author, Type (bug/other), URL
This creates an automatic issue log that the team can reference.
Step 6: Test and Activate
- Click Execute Workflow to run a test with the sample data from Step 1
- Verify each node executed successfully (green checkmarks)
- Check your Slack channels for the test notification
- Check your Google Sheet for the logged entry
- Fix any field mapping issues
- Toggle the workflow to Active in the top-right corner
Error Handling
Add error handling to make the workflow production-ready:
- Click on any node and select Settings
- Enable Continue on Fail for non-critical nodes (like the Google Sheets logging)
- Add an Error Trigger workflow that sends you a notification if the main workflow fails
- Set up retry logic for transient API failures
Next Steps
Now that organizations have a working workflow:
- Add more triggers: Monitor pull requests, comments, or releases
- Enrich notifications: Add assignee information, milestone details, or priority labels
- Build related workflows: Auto-assign issues based on labels, create Jira tickets from GitHub issues, or generate weekly summary reports
- Explore the n8n community: Browse 1,000+ workflow templates at n8n.io/workflows for inspiration
This pattern of trigger, transform, route, and action applies to virtually any automation users will build. The concepts transfer directly to more complex workflows.
Tools Mentioned
Related Guides
Moxo vs Gumloop in 2026: Texting the Client, or Building the Agent
Gumloop (founded 2023) builds AI agents a company's own staff run; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs processes that wait on people outside the company. Gumloop wins three rounds to two: the way in, per-tool gating and a priced overage. Moxo wins on…
Moxo vs Relay.app in 2026: Where Relay's Approval Workflows Can Go Next
Relay.app, founded in 2021, shut down in September 2026 and deleted every account, workflow and run history; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, is one destination for its human-in-the-loop users. Relay.app takes two rounds, Moxo one, and vendor risk is a draw…
Moxo vs Workato in 2026: The Integration Estate, or the Approval Inside It
Workato, founded in 2013, is an enterprise integration platform whose Workflow apps add human tasks to recipes; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, ships the human step itself. Workato wins three rounds to two: connector reach, change control and the way in…
Related Rankings
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9…
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two…
Common Questions
How do banks and wealth firms use Moxo for client onboarding?
Moxo's financial-services page (read 13 October 2026) pitches account opening and KYC reviews as shared work: the client gets a secure link to see what is needed and sign, while relationship managers, compliance and operations staff review and approve inside one tracked flow. The…
Can healthcare teams run patient-facing workflows on Moxo?
Yes for coordination work, once a signed BAA is in hand: Moxo told Automation Atlas in writing on 6 October 2026 that it signs BAAs, but it publishes none and did not say which plans the agreement covers or whether it reaches Moxo AI. Moxo says it has no native EHR, HL7 or FHIR…
Who is accountable when an AI agent acts in a Moxo workflow?
The company that deploys the agent is accountable: Moxo's Terms and Conditions (read 13 October 2026) make the customer "solely responsible for any AI Content, including the accuracy, quality, appropriateness, and legality thereof". In the workflow, a named person owns each human…
How does Moxo keep humans in control when AI agents run a workflow?
Moxo keeps people on the decisions by design: approvals and other human steps are ones its product page says "only a person can close", and AI agents can fill preparer, advisor or reviewer slots around them (both read 15 September 2026). The checks on AI output are opt-in…