What are the key differences between Zapier and Make?
Quick Answer: Zapier is easier to use with 7,000+ app connections and a linear workflow builder, while Make offers better pricing, a visual canvas for complex logic, and stronger data transformation capabilities. Zapier is best for simple automations; Make excels at complex, data-heavy workflows.
Zapier vs Make: A Detailed Comparison
Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) are two of the most popular workflow automation platforms, but they serve different needs. Here is a thorough breakdown.
Pricing and Value
Zapier uses a task-based pricing model. Each time a step in your workflow runs, it counts as a task. The free tier includes 100 tasks per month with single-step workflows only. Paid plans start at $19.99/month for 750 tasks.
Make uses an operations-based model with more generous limits. The free tier includes 1,000 operations per month with 2 active scenarios. Paid plans start at $9/month for 10,000 operations. For most use cases, Make offers better value, especially for multi-step workflows where Zapier charges per step.
Ease of Use
Zapier is the easier platform to learn. Its linear, step-by-step workflow builder is intuitive for non-technical users. You simply choose a trigger, add actions, and map fields. The trade-off is less flexibility for complex logic.
Make uses a visual canvas where you drag and connect modules. While the learning curve is steeper, the visual approach lets you build branching logic, parallel paths, and complex data transformations more naturally. Advanced users tend to prefer Make for this reason.
Integration Ecosystem
Zapier leads with 7,000+ app connections, the largest ecosystem of any automation platform. If an app has an API, chances are Zapier supports it.
Make offers 1,800+ app modules, which is fewer but still covers most popular tools. Make modules tend to offer deeper functionality per app, exposing more API endpoints than Zapier typically does.
Developer Experience
Zapier provides code steps (Python and JavaScript) and a developer platform for building custom integrations. However, the linear workflow model can feel limiting for complex logic.
Make offers a more developer-friendly experience with its visual data routing, built-in functions, and JSON/XML handling. For teams that need to transform data between steps, Make is significantly more capable.
When to Choose Each
- Choose Zapier if you want the easiest setup, need access to the widest range of apps, and your workflows are primarily simple trigger-action pairs.
- Choose Make if you need complex branching logic, want better pricing at scale, or require advanced data transformation between steps.
Related Questions
- Can you integrate AI and LLMs with workflow automation tools?
- How do I choose the right workflow automation tool for my business?
- What are the best automation tools for developers and engineering teams?
- What are the best open-source workflow automation tools?
- IFTTT vs Zapier: Which automation platform should you choose in 2026?
Related Rankings
Best Open Source Automation Platforms 2026
Our curated ranking of the top open-source workflow automation platforms for teams that want transparency, self-hosting capabilities, and community-driven development.
Best Workflow Automation Tools 2026
Our curated ranking of the top workflow automation platforms for businesses.
Dive Deeper
Automation Tool Comparison: n8n vs Zapier vs Make vs Power Automate (2026)
A comprehensive comparison of the four leading workflow automation platforms covering pricing, features, ease of use, and self-hosting capabilities.
Building Your First n8n Workflow: A Step-by-Step Tutorial
Step-by-step tutorial for building a GitHub-to-Slack notification workflow in n8n with conditional routing and logging.
Getting Started with Workflow Automation in 2026
A step-by-step guide to choosing and implementing your first workflow automation tool.