How much funding has n8n raised and what is its valuation?
Quick Answer: n8n raised a $60 million Series C round in November 2025 at a reported valuation of approximately $600 million. The round was led by Highland Europe with participation from existing investors. As of March 2026, n8n reports over 60,000 self-hosted installations, 3,000+ cloud customers, and 800+ community-built integrations. The AI agent nodes introduced in 2025 have become a key growth driver.
n8n Series C and Current Status
n8n, the open-source workflow automation platform headquartered in Berlin, closed a $60 million Series C funding round in November 2025 at a reported valuation of approximately $600 million. The round was led by Highland Europe, with participation from existing investors Sequoia Capital and Felicis Ventures.
Funding History
| Round | Date | Amount | Valuation | Lead Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed | 2020 | $1.5M | Undisclosed | — |
| Series A | 2021 | $12M | ~$50M | Sequoia Capital |
| Series B | 2023 | $14M | ~$100M | Highland Europe |
| Series C | November 2025 | $60M | ~$600M | Highland Europe |
Key Developments Since Series C
AI Agent Nodes
n8n introduced AI agent nodes in 2025 using LangChain integration, enabling workflows to incorporate LLM-based decision-making, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and multi-step AI reasoning. These nodes support multiple AI providers including OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and open-source models via Ollama. As of March 2026, AI-related workflows account for an estimated 25-30% of new workflow creation on n8n Cloud.
Growth Metrics (as of March 2026)
- Over 60,000 active self-hosted installations (estimated from Docker Hub and npm downloads)
- 3,000+ paid cloud customers
- 800+ community-built integration nodes
- 46,000+ GitHub stars
- Active community forum with approximately 15,000 registered members
Product Updates
- n8n Cloud pricing was adjusted in early 2026, with the Starter plan at $24/month and the Pro plan at $50/month.
- Workflow versioning and Git-based source control were added to the Enterprise tier.
- Sub-workflow improvements including better error handling and parameter passing between parent and child workflows.
- Performance optimizations for handling large data payloads (1M+ records) in self-hosted deployments.
Competitive Positioning
n8n's $600 million valuation places it among the most valuable open-source automation companies. For comparison, Zapier was valued at approximately $5 billion as of its last funding round. Make (formerly Integromat) was acquired by Celonis in 2020 and does not have a standalone valuation. n8n's open-source model and self-hosted option differentiate it from both Zapier and Make, particularly for privacy-conscious organizations and developer teams that prefer infrastructure control.
Use of Funds
n8n indicated that Series C funds would be allocated to:
- Expanding AI agent capabilities and LLM integrations
- Growing the enterprise sales team in North America
- Improving the cloud platform reliability and performance
- Building out the n8n marketplace for community-contributed nodes
Editor's Note: We run n8n self-hosted for 12 client deployments. Since the AI agent nodes launched, 4 of those 12 clients have built AI-powered workflows (customer support classification, document summarization, lead scoring). The self-hosted installation base continues to grow faster than the cloud customer count, which aligns with n8n's developer-first positioning. The main enterprise barrier remains the lack of a polished admin UI for non-technical operations teams — n8n is still primarily a developer tool.
Related Questions
- What are the best workflow automation tools for technical writers in 2026?
- What are the best AI-native automation tools in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for finance and AP teams in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for nonprofits in 2026?
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared
Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.
Inngest vs Temporal 2026: Durable Functions vs Durable Workflows
Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first durable functions platform with TypeScript and Python SDKs, 50,000 step runs/month free, and Hobby pricing from $20/month. Temporal (2019) is the heavyweight durable workflow engine with seven-language SDK coverage, Cassandra-backed scale, and Cloud pricing from roughly $200/month at low volume or $2.5-4.5K/month self-host. This 2026 comparison covers programming model, pricing, scale ceiling, and operational footprint.