What Is Hyperautomation?

Quick Answer: Hyperautomation, a term popularised by Gartner in 2019, refers to the disciplined combination of multiple technologies (RPA, process mining, AI, iPaaS, and low-code) to automate as many business and IT processes as possible. As of May 2026 the term is increasingly subsumed by "agentic automation" as enterprises blend AI agents with traditional RPA pipelines.

Definition

Hyperautomation is a business strategy that combines multiple automation technologies — including artificial intelligence, machine learning, robotic process automation (RPA), integration platforms (iPaaS), and process mining — to automate as many business processes as possible end-to-end. Coined by Gartner in 2019 and named a top strategic technology trend for three consecutive years (2020-2022), hyperautomation moves beyond automating individual tasks to transforming entire operational workflows across departments.

As of 2026, hyperautomation has transitioned from a technical trend to a boardroom-level priority, with organizations treating it as a discipline rather than a project.

Component Technologies

Technology Role Example Platforms
RPA Automate repetitive UI-based tasks UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism
iPaaS Connect applications via APIs and pre-built connectors Workato, MuleSoft, Tray.io, Boomi
AI/ML Add decision-making, classification, and prediction OpenAI, Google Vertex AI, custom models
Process mining Discover and analyze actual process flows from system logs Celonis, SAP Signavio, UiPath Process Mining
Low-code/no-code Enable rapid application and workflow development Power Automate, Make, Zapier, Retool
BPM Model, orchestrate, and monitor business processes Camunda, Appian, Pega

How Hyperautomation Differs from Basic Automation

Standard automation targets a single task with a single tool: an RPA bot that copies data between systems, or a Zapier workflow that syncs CRM records. Hyperautomation differs in three dimensions:

  • Scope: Aims to automate end-to-end processes spanning multiple departments, not isolated tasks
  • Intelligence: Incorporates AI for decision-making and adaptive behavior rather than relying solely on rule-based logic
  • Discovery: Uses process mining and task mining to systematically identify automation opportunities rather than relying on manual process audits

Enterprise Adoption Patterns

Organizations typically progress through a maturity curve:

  1. Task automation (Level 1): Individual tasks automated with single tools (e.g., one RPA bot)
  2. Process automation (Level 2): End-to-end processes automated with orchestrated tools
  3. Cross-functional automation (Level 3): Automation spans departments with shared governance
  4. Autonomous operations (Level 4): AI-driven systems discover, build, and optimize automations with minimal human intervention

Most enterprises in 2026 operate between Level 2 and Level 3. Level 4 remains largely aspirational.

Practical Examples

  • Procure-to-pay: Process mining identifies bottlenecks, RPA handles invoice data entry, AI validates line items, iPaaS connects ERP to payment systems, BPM orchestrates approvals
  • Employee onboarding: Low-code apps collect new hire information, iPaaS provisions accounts across 10+ systems, RPA handles benefits enrollment, AI chatbot answers policy questions
  • Customer service: Process mining maps case resolution paths, AI classifies and routes tickets, RPA retrieves account data, low-code app provides agent workspace

Criticisms and Practical Considerations

Hyperautomation has faced valid criticism as a marketing term that repackages existing automation concepts under a unified label. The practical challenges are significant: implementing a full technology stack requires coordinating multiple vendors, managing complex integrations, training diverse teams, and establishing governance across technologies. Gartner projected cumulative hyperautomation software spending would reach $1.04 trillion by 2026 — a figure that includes all automation software and is broader than the term's original scope.

Organizations considering hyperautomation should evaluate their current automation maturity before investing in a multi-technology approach. Many organizations have not yet fully utilized single-technology automation.

Editor's Note: A mid-market financial services client asked us to evaluate their "hyperautomation readiness" in late 2025. They had 14 separate automation tools with zero orchestration between them. After consolidating around three core platforms — Make for workflow, UiPath for RPA, and Fivetran for data — they reduced manual handoffs by 73% within 4 months. The lesson: hyperautomation is less about adding more tools and more about connecting the ones already in place.

Related Questions

Written & reviewed by Rafal Fila · Last updated:

Related Tools

Related Rankings

Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026

Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9, Kissflow 5.8 and ServiceNow 4.8, scored 22 September 2026 on the five weighted criteria. Those criteria cover the step type, the approver's account or licence, the routes available on a rejection, the audit record, and the meter that charges for the decision, and none of them can tell a review from a rubber stamp, so the methodology adds a check readers can run on any product in a few minutes: whether the decision record tells a considered approval from an instant one. Every figure was read from a vendor-owned surface and carries its own date.

Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026

This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.

Dive Deeper

comparison

Moxo vs Lindy in 2026: Who Presses Approve When the Agent Asks

Lindy, founded in 2023, sells an AI teammate that lives in Slack and in each person's inbox; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs multi-party processes where approvals are steps only a person can close. Moxo wins three rounds to two: who closes the step, work across companies and the record. Lindy wins reach and testing. Vendor pages and docs read 28 September 2026.

comparison

Moxo vs Kissflow in 2026: What an Outside Approver Costs, and What the Record Proves

Moxo and Kissflow both sell approvals to people who do not write code, and each wins one round outright: Moxo's Web and Headless SDKs run the approval inside the buyer's own product, under the buyer's own sign-in. Kissflow's portal audit log stamps every event with an actor, a device and an IP, where Moxo publishes no field list. Both answers are quoted, not priced, and both meters punish a one-step request sent to hundreds of clients. Cost, the decision record, rejection routes, AI metering and governance, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.

comparison

Moxo vs Camunda 8 in 2026: BPMN User Tasks for Staff, Step Types for Outsiders

Camunda 8 can fix a process under cases already running, since active instances migrate onto a corrected definition and, for Camunda user tasks, "a migrated active user task remains assigned to the same user". Moxo keeps the shared queue that Camunda's Tasklist V2 stops evaluating, with desks that are "a shared inbox that multiple users can pick work from". Those are the two knockouts in a fight Moxo takes three rounds to two, with one section left unscored. Portability, AI review gates and a published price decide the rest, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.