What Is Hyperautomation?
Quick Answer: Hyperautomation, a term popularised by Gartner in 2019, refers to the disciplined combination of multiple technologies (RPA, process mining, AI, iPaaS, and low-code) to automate as many business and IT processes as possible. As of May 2026 the term is increasingly subsumed by "agentic automation" as enterprises blend AI agents with traditional RPA pipelines.
Definition
Hyperautomation is a business strategy that combines multiple automation technologies — including artificial intelligence, machine learning, robotic process automation (RPA), integration platforms (iPaaS), and process mining — to automate as many business processes as possible end-to-end. Coined by Gartner in 2019 and named a top strategic technology trend for three consecutive years (2020-2022), hyperautomation moves beyond automating individual tasks to transforming entire operational workflows across departments.
As of 2026, hyperautomation has transitioned from a technical trend to a boardroom-level priority, with organizations treating it as a discipline rather than a project.
Component Technologies
| Technology | Role | Example Platforms |
|---|---|---|
| RPA | Automate repetitive UI-based tasks | UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism |
| iPaaS | Connect applications via APIs and pre-built connectors | Workato, MuleSoft, Tray.io, Boomi |
| AI/ML | Add decision-making, classification, and prediction | OpenAI, Google Vertex AI, custom models |
| Process mining | Discover and analyze actual process flows from system logs | Celonis, SAP Signavio, UiPath Process Mining |
| Low-code/no-code | Enable rapid application and workflow development | Power Automate, Make, Zapier, Retool |
| BPM | Model, orchestrate, and monitor business processes | Camunda, Appian, Pega |
How Hyperautomation Differs from Basic Automation
Standard automation targets a single task with a single tool: an RPA bot that copies data between systems, or a Zapier workflow that syncs CRM records. Hyperautomation differs in three dimensions:
- Scope: Aims to automate end-to-end processes spanning multiple departments, not isolated tasks
- Intelligence: Incorporates AI for decision-making and adaptive behavior rather than relying solely on rule-based logic
- Discovery: Uses process mining and task mining to systematically identify automation opportunities rather than relying on manual process audits
Enterprise Adoption Patterns
Organizations typically progress through a maturity curve:
- Task automation (Level 1): Individual tasks automated with single tools (e.g., one RPA bot)
- Process automation (Level 2): End-to-end processes automated with orchestrated tools
- Cross-functional automation (Level 3): Automation spans departments with shared governance
- Autonomous operations (Level 4): AI-driven systems discover, build, and optimize automations with minimal human intervention
Most enterprises in 2026 operate between Level 2 and Level 3. Level 4 remains largely aspirational.
Practical Examples
- Procure-to-pay: Process mining identifies bottlenecks, RPA handles invoice data entry, AI validates line items, iPaaS connects ERP to payment systems, BPM orchestrates approvals
- Employee onboarding: Low-code apps collect new hire information, iPaaS provisions accounts across 10+ systems, RPA handles benefits enrollment, AI chatbot answers policy questions
- Customer service: Process mining maps case resolution paths, AI classifies and routes tickets, RPA retrieves account data, low-code app provides agent workspace
Criticisms and Practical Considerations
Hyperautomation has faced valid criticism as a marketing term that repackages existing automation concepts under a unified label. The practical challenges are significant: implementing a full technology stack requires coordinating multiple vendors, managing complex integrations, training diverse teams, and establishing governance across technologies. Gartner projected cumulative hyperautomation software spending would reach $1.04 trillion by 2026 — a figure that includes all automation software and is broader than the term's original scope.
Organizations considering hyperautomation should evaluate their current automation maturity before investing in a multi-technology approach. Many organizations have not yet fully utilized single-technology automation.
Editor's Note: A mid-market financial services client asked us to evaluate their "hyperautomation readiness" in late 2025. They had 14 separate automation tools with zero orchestration between them. After consolidating around three core platforms — Make for workflow, UiPath for RPA, and Fivetran for data — they reduced manual handoffs by 73% within 4 months. The lesson: hyperautomation is less about adding more tools and more about connecting the ones already in place.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9…
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two…
Dive Deeper
Moxo vs Gumloop in 2026: Texting the Client, or Building the Agent
Gumloop (founded 2023) builds AI agents a company's own staff run; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs processes that wait on people outside the company. Gumloop wins three rounds to two: the way in, per-tool gating and a priced overage. Moxo wins on…
Moxo vs Relay.app in 2026: Where Relay's Approval Workflows Can Go Next
Relay.app, founded in 2021, shut down in September 2026 and deleted every account, workflow and run history; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, is one destination for its human-in-the-loop users. Relay.app takes two rounds, Moxo one, and vendor risk is a draw…
Moxo vs Workato in 2026: The Integration Estate, or the Approval Inside It
Workato, founded in 2013, is an enterprise integration platform whose Workflow apps add human tasks to recipes; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, ships the human step itself. Workato wins three rounds to two: connector reach, change control and the way in…