What's the difference between Trigger.dev and Inngest?
Quick Answer: Trigger.dev is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server, a managed cloud, 50,000 step runs/month free, and $20/month Hobby pricing.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest: Direct Comparison
Trigger.dev (2022, London, Apache 2.0) and Inngest (2021, San Francisco, OSS dev server plus managed cloud) are both TypeScript-first durable runners but ship different programming models and license postures.
Programming Model
Trigger.dev v3 uses task-based authoring with retries, concurrency limits, and machine-size selection per task. Tasks are compiled and deployed via CLI to the Trigger.dev runtime.
Inngest uses event-driven step authoring. A function listens on an event or schedule and runs sequential or parallel step.run, step.sleep, step.waitForEvent, and step.sendEvent calls, each independently retryable.
License and Self-Host
Trigger.dev is fully Apache 2.0 across the platform with first-class self-host via Docker Compose or Kubernetes. Inngest open-sources the dev server only; the production cloud is proprietary, with self-host available on enterprise plans.
Pricing (May 2026)
- Trigger.dev: Hobby free tier; Pro from $20/month with run and machine fees; self-host zero license cost
- Inngest: Free 50K step runs/month; Hobby $20/month; Pro $50-$500/month tiers
When Each Wins
Trigger.dev wins when the Apache 2.0 license is decisive (compliance, sovereignty, open-source policy) or self-host on the team's own infrastructure is a first-class requirement. Inngest wins when event-driven step semantics fit the workflow shape better than task-based jobs and managed cloud with zero ops is the priority.
For deeper analysis, see the Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026 comparison guide.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Trigger.dev
Open-source background jobs and durable workflows platform for TypeScript developers.
Workflow AutomationInngest
Durable workflow and background job platform for TypeScript and Python services.
Workflow AutomationHatchet
Open-source distributed task queue and workflow engine for Python, TypeScript, and Go services.
Workflow AutomationTemporal Workflows
Build applications that never lose state, even when everything else fails.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.
QuantumBPM vs Camunda 2026: Single-Binary Challenger vs the BPMN Incumbent
QuantumBPM (launched 2026, Coroid s.r.o., Slovakia) packages a BPMN 2.0 runtime and DMN 1.5 decision engine into one Go binary backed by Temporal and PostgreSQL. Camunda (Berlin, founded 2013) is the category incumbent: Camunda 7 (Apache 2.0, in maintenance) and the Zeebe-based Camunda 8 platform. This comparison covers product structure, architecture, DMN TCK conformance with recording dates, deployment, pricing, and vendor maturity, verified July 2026.
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.