What's the difference between Trigger.dev and Inngest?
Quick Answer: Trigger.dev is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server, a managed cloud, 50,000 step runs/month free, and $20/month Hobby pricing.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest: Direct Comparison
Trigger.dev (2022, London, Apache 2.0) and Inngest (2021, San Francisco, OSS dev server plus managed cloud) are both TypeScript-first durable runners but ship different programming models and license postures.
Programming Model
Trigger.dev v3 uses task-based authoring with retries, concurrency limits, and machine-size selection per task. Tasks are compiled and deployed via CLI to the Trigger.dev runtime.
Inngest uses event-driven step authoring. A function listens on an event or schedule and runs sequential or parallel step.run, step.sleep, step.waitForEvent, and step.sendEvent calls, each independently retryable.
License and Self-Host
Trigger.dev is fully Apache 2.0 across the platform with first-class self-host via Docker Compose or Kubernetes. Inngest open-sources the dev server only; the production cloud is proprietary, with self-host available on enterprise plans.
Pricing (May 2026)
- Trigger.dev: Hobby free tier; Pro from $20/month with run and machine fees; self-host zero license cost
- Inngest: Free 50K step runs/month; Hobby $20/month; Pro $50-$500/month tiers
When Each Wins
Trigger.dev wins when the Apache 2.0 license is decisive (compliance, sovereignty, open-source policy) or self-host on the team's own infrastructure is a first-class requirement. Inngest wins when event-driven step semantics fit the workflow shape better than task-based jobs and managed cloud with zero ops is the priority.
For deeper analysis, see the Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026 comparison guide.
Related Questions
- What are the best workflow automation tools for technical writers in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
- What are the best AI-native automation tools in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for finance and AP teams in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for nonprofits in 2026?
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared
Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.
Inngest vs Temporal 2026: Durable Functions vs Durable Workflows
Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first durable functions platform with TypeScript and Python SDKs, 50,000 step runs/month free, and Hobby pricing from $20/month. Temporal (2019) is the heavyweight durable workflow engine with seven-language SDK coverage, Cassandra-backed scale, and Cloud pricing from roughly $200/month at low volume or $2.5-4.5K/month self-host. This 2026 comparison covers programming model, pricing, scale ceiling, and operational footprint.