How much does Tines cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: Tines offers a free Community Edition (1 builder and 3 flows, with unlimited viewers, runs, and integrations plus SSO). Its paid offering is a single quote-based "Business and Enterprise" plan, alongside specialized editions for Federal, SLED, and MSSP customers — there is no public "Professional" tier and no published price. Based on reported customer data, enterprise contracts typically start around $50,000/year for small security teams and scale to $200,000+ for large SOCs.
Pricing Overview
Tines is a security automation and orchestration (SOAR) platform aimed at security operations centers and IT teams. It offers a genuinely usable free Community Edition and quote-based paid pricing — there is no public mid-tier.
Tines Pricing (as of July 2026)
| Tier | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Community | $0 | 1 builder, 3 flows, unlimited viewers/runs/integrations, SSO included, community library |
| Business & Enterprise | Custom (typically $50,000+/year) | Multi-user, SSO/SAML, audit logs, tenant management, dedicated support, SLA |
| Specialized Editions | Custom | Federal, SLED (State/Local/Education), and MSSP editions |
The Community Edition is a free tier, not a time-limited trial, but it is now scoped to 1 builder and 3 flows (unlimited viewers, runs, and integrations, with SSO included). All paid pricing is quote-based — Tines does not publish a "Professional" tier or any list price.
What each plan includes
Community
Access to all core actions (HTTP requests, triggers, event transforms, data storage) and the community library of pre-built stories for phishing triage, alert enrichment, and vulnerability management. The limits are 1 builder and 3 flows; team collaboration, tenant management, and audit features require a paid plan.
Business & Enterprise
Negotiated directly with Tines. Based on reported customer data and analyst estimates, annual contracts typically start around $50,000 for small security teams and scale to $200,000+ for large SOCs. Includes multi-user workspaces, SSO/SAML, audit logging, tenant management for MSSPs, role-based access, and dedicated support with SLA. Distinct Federal, SLED, and MSSP editions exist for those markets.
How Tines pricing compares
Tines competes with SOAR platforms like Palo Alto XSOAR (~$75,000/year for a 100-incident/day license) and Splunk SOAR (usage-based, $30,000-$100,000+/year). For general-purpose automation, Zapier and Make are far cheaper but lack the security-specific actions, case management, and SOC features. Tines' Community Edition remains the most generous free tier among SOAR platforms.
Editor's Note: We evaluated Tines for a 12-person security team at a financial services firm. The Community Edition was productive within a week for a single analyst building phishing-triage automations. When the team needed multi-user access, the Enterprise quote came in at $85,000/year for 12 seats, versus $120,000/year for Palo Alto XSOAR. Tines was chosen, and the team automated 65% of Tier-1 alert triage within 3 months, cutting mean time to respond from 45 minutes to 8. Re-checked July 2026: the free Community Edition is now explicitly scoped to 1 builder and 3 flows, so it is an evaluation tool — the moment a second builder or a fourth production flow is needed, it is a quote-based Enterprise conversation. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
Tines
No-code security automation and SOAR platform
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Dive Deeper
Client Portals vs Workflow Orchestration Platforms: What Changes When External Parties Act Inside a Process
What changes when a client or supplier has to act inside your process, not just watch it? This guide compares four client portals with four orchestration platforms on how outsiders get in, whether you pay for them and what the audit log records, from vendor sources read 14 and 15 September 2026.
Moxo vs Zapier in 2026: Human Approval Steps, External Participants and Pricing
Moxo and Zapier both put a person in front of an automated decision, from opposite ends: Moxo builds the process out of human steps and attaches AI, while Zapier pauses an automation for a reviewer through its Human in the Loop app. This guide compares approvers, rejection, AI approval, audit logs, governance and pricing, verified 14 and 15 September 2026.
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.