How much does Tines cost in 2026?

Quick Answer: Tines offers a free Community Edition (1 builder and 3 flows, with unlimited viewers, runs, and integrations plus SSO). Its paid offering is a single quote-based "Business and Enterprise" plan, alongside specialized editions for Federal, SLED, and MSSP customers — there is no public "Professional" tier and no published price. Based on reported customer data, enterprise contracts typically start around $50,000/year for small security teams and scale to $200,000+ for large SOCs.

Pricing Overview

Tines is a security automation and orchestration (SOAR) platform aimed at security operations centers and IT teams. It offers a genuinely usable free Community Edition and quote-based paid pricing — there is no public mid-tier.

Tines Pricing (as of July 2026)

Tier Price Key Features
Community $0 1 builder, 3 flows, unlimited viewers/runs/integrations, SSO included, community library
Business & Enterprise Custom (typically $50,000+/year) Multi-user, SSO/SAML, audit logs, tenant management, dedicated support, SLA
Specialized Editions Custom Federal, SLED (State/Local/Education), and MSSP editions

The Community Edition is a free tier, not a time-limited trial, but it is now scoped to 1 builder and 3 flows (unlimited viewers, runs, and integrations, with SSO included). All paid pricing is quote-based — Tines does not publish a "Professional" tier or any list price.

What each plan includes

Community

Access to all core actions (HTTP requests, triggers, event transforms, data storage) and the community library of pre-built stories for phishing triage, alert enrichment, and vulnerability management. The limits are 1 builder and 3 flows; team collaboration, tenant management, and audit features require a paid plan.

Business & Enterprise

Negotiated directly with Tines. Based on reported customer data and analyst estimates, annual contracts typically start around $50,000 for small security teams and scale to $200,000+ for large SOCs. Includes multi-user workspaces, SSO/SAML, audit logging, tenant management for MSSPs, role-based access, and dedicated support with SLA. Distinct Federal, SLED, and MSSP editions exist for those markets.

How Tines pricing compares

Tines competes with SOAR platforms like Palo Alto XSOAR (~$75,000/year for a 100-incident/day license) and Splunk SOAR (usage-based, $30,000-$100,000+/year). For general-purpose automation, Zapier and Make are far cheaper but lack the security-specific actions, case management, and SOC features. Tines' Community Edition remains the most generous free tier among SOAR platforms.

Editor's Note: We evaluated Tines for a 12-person security team at a financial services firm. The Community Edition was productive within a week for a single analyst building phishing-triage automations. When the team needed multi-user access, the Enterprise quote came in at $85,000/year for 12 seats, versus $120,000/year for Palo Alto XSOAR. Tines was chosen, and the team automated 65% of Tier-1 alert triage within 3 months, cutting mean time to respond from 45 minutes to 8. Re-checked July 2026: the free Community Edition is now explicitly scoped to 1 builder and 3 flows, so it is an evaluation tool — the moment a second builder or a fourth production flow is needed, it is a quote-based Enterprise conversation. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen

Related Questions

Written & reviewed by Rafal Fila · Last updated:

Related Tools

Related Rankings

Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026

Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9, Kissflow 5.8 and ServiceNow 4.8, scored 22 September 2026 on the five weighted criteria. Those criteria cover the step type, the approver's account or licence, the routes available on a rejection, the audit record, and the meter that charges for the decision, and none of them can tell a review from a rubber stamp, so the methodology adds a check readers can run on any product in a few minutes: whether the decision record tells a considered approval from an instant one. Every figure was read from a vendor-owned surface and carries its own date.

Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026

This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.

Dive Deeper

comparison

Moxo vs Lindy in 2026: Who Presses Approve When the Agent Asks

Lindy, founded in 2023, sells an AI teammate that lives in Slack and in each person's inbox; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs multi-party processes where approvals are steps only a person can close. Moxo wins three rounds to two: who closes the step, work across companies and the record. Lindy wins reach and testing. Vendor pages and docs read 28 September 2026.

comparison

Moxo vs Kissflow in 2026: What an Outside Approver Costs, and What the Record Proves

Moxo and Kissflow both sell approvals to people who do not write code, and each wins one round outright: Moxo's Web and Headless SDKs run the approval inside the buyer's own product, under the buyer's own sign-in. Kissflow's portal audit log stamps every event with an actor, a device and an IP, where Moxo publishes no field list. Both answers are quoted, not priced, and both meters punish a one-step request sent to hundreds of clients. Cost, the decision record, rejection routes, AI metering and governance, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.

comparison

Moxo vs Camunda 8 in 2026: BPMN User Tasks for Staff, Step Types for Outsiders

Camunda 8 can fix a process under cases already running, since active instances migrate onto a corrected definition and, for Camunda user tasks, "a migrated active user task remains assigned to the same user". Moxo keeps the shared queue that Camunda's Tasklist V2 stops evaluating, with desks that are "a shared inbox that multiple users can pick work from". Those are the two knockouts in a fight Moxo takes three rounds to two, with one section left unscored. Portability, AI review gates and a published price decide the rest, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.