How much does Tines cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: Tines offers a free Community Edition with unlimited workflows for single users. Enterprise pricing is custom and typically starts at $50,000 or more per year, based on team size and deployment requirements as of March 2026.
Pricing Overview
Tines is a security automation and orchestration platform that uses an enterprise sales model for its paid tier. Unlike consumer-focused automation tools, Tines targets security operations centers (SOCs) and IT teams. The platform offers a free Community Edition and custom Enterprise pricing.
Tines Pricing Tiers (as of March 2026)
| Tier | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Community | $0 | Unlimited stories (workflows), all core actions, community library, single-user |
| Enterprise | Custom (typically $50,000+/year) | Multi-user, SSO/SAML, audit logs, tenant management, dedicated support, SLA |
What Each Plan Includes
Community
The Tines Community Edition is a genuinely usable free tier, not a time-limited trial. It provides access to all core actions (HTTP requests, triggers, event transforms, data storage) and the ability to build unlimited stories (Tines' term for workflows). The main limitations are single-user access and the absence of team collaboration, SSO, and audit features. The community library offers hundreds of pre-built stories for common security automation use cases including phishing triage, alert enrichment, and vulnerability management.
Enterprise
Enterprise pricing is negotiated directly with the Tines sales team. Based on reported customer data and industry analyst estimates, annual contracts typically start at $50,000 for small security teams and scale to $200,000+ for large SOCs with 20+ analysts. Enterprise includes multi-user workspaces, SSO/SAML integration, audit logging, tenant management for MSSPs, role-based access control, and dedicated customer support with SLA guarantees.
Hidden Costs and Considerations
- No mid-tier option: Tines offers no paid tier between free (single-user) and Enterprise ($50,000+/year). Teams of 2-5 security analysts who need collaboration features face a significant cost jump with no intermediate option.
- Integration effort: While Tines connects to any API via HTTP actions, there are no pre-built "connectors" in the traditional iPaaS sense. Security teams should budget developer time for building and maintaining custom API integrations with their security stack.
- Training and onboarding: Tines has a steeper learning curve than consumer automation platforms. Budget 2-4 weeks for a security analyst to become proficient with story building.
How Tines Pricing Compares
Tines competes with other SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) platforms. Palo Alto XSOAR starts at approximately $75,000/year for a 100-incident/day license. Splunk SOAR pricing is usage-based and typically ranges from $30,000 to $100,000+/year. For general-purpose automation, Zapier and Make are 10-50x less expensive, but they lack the security-specific actions, case management, and SOC-focused features that Tines provides. The Community Edition is the most generous free tier among SOAR platforms.
Editor's Note: We evaluated Tines for a 12-person security team at a financial services firm. The Community Edition was productive within a week for a single analyst building phishing triage automations. When the team needed multi-user access, the Enterprise quote came in at $85,000/year for 12 seats. The alternative — Palo Alto XSOAR — was quoted at $120,000/year. Tines was chosen, and the team automated 65% of their Tier 1 alert triage within 3 months, reducing mean time to respond from 45 minutes to 8 minutes. The hidden cost was 3 months of a senior analyst's time ($35,000 equivalent) building the initial automation library.
Related Questions
- What are the best workflow automation tools for technical writers in 2026?
- What are the best AI-native automation tools in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for finance and AP teams in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for nonprofits in 2026?
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared
Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.
Inngest vs Temporal 2026: Durable Functions vs Durable Workflows
Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first durable functions platform with TypeScript and Python SDKs, 50,000 step runs/month free, and Hobby pricing from $20/month. Temporal (2019) is the heavyweight durable workflow engine with seven-language SDK coverage, Cassandra-backed scale, and Cloud pricing from roughly $200/month at low volume or $2.5-4.5K/month self-host. This 2026 comparison covers programming model, pricing, scale ceiling, and operational footprint.