What does Relay.app cost in 2026? Pricing tiers and plans explained
Quick Answer: Relay.app offers a free plan with 100 runs per month. Pro costs $9.99/month for 2,500 runs, and Growth costs $29.99/month for 10,000 runs. Runs are counted per workflow execution (not per step), and all plans include the human-in-the-loop approval feature as of March 2026.
Pricing Overview
Relay.app is an automation platform that differentiates itself with human-in-the-loop capabilities, allowing workflows to pause and request human approval, input, or review before proceeding. The platform uses run-based pricing across three tiers. A "run" in Relay.app is counted per workflow execution, regardless of the number of steps.
Relay.app Pricing Tiers (as of March 2026)
| Tier | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (100 runs/mo) | Human-in-the-loop, basic integrations, single user |
| Pro | $9.99/month | 2,500 runs/mo, all integrations, team collaboration |
| Growth | $29.99/month | 10,000 runs/mo, custom branding, priority support, API access |
What Each Tier Includes
Free
The free tier provides 100 runs per month with access to the human-in-the-loop feature that defines Relay.app. Users can build workflows that pause at any step to request human approval via email, Slack, or the Relay.app dashboard. Basic integrations with popular applications (Google Workspace, Slack, Notion, Airtable) are included. The 100-run limit is suitable for low-volume approval workflows.
Pro
The Pro tier at $9.99 per month increases the run limit to 2,500 and unlocks all available integrations, team collaboration features, and workflow templates. Multi-step workflows with conditional branching, data formatting, and error handling are included. This tier covers most small business automation needs.
Growth
The Growth tier at $29.99 per month provides 10,000 runs, custom branding for approval request emails, priority support, and API access for triggering workflows programmatically. This tier targets growing teams with higher automation volumes and custom workflow requirements.
Hidden Costs and Considerations
- Run-based counting advantage: Relay.app counts runs per workflow execution, not per step. A 6-step workflow triggered once counts as 1 run. On Zapier, the same workflow would consume 6 tasks. This makes Relay.app 3-6x more cost-efficient per run allocation for multi-step workflows.
- Human-in-the-loop latency: Workflows that pause for human input introduce latency. If an approver is unavailable, the workflow waits indefinitely. Time-sensitive processes may need fallback logic or timeout configurations.
- Integration ecosystem size: Relay.app supports approximately 100 integrations as of March 2026, significantly fewer than Zapier (7,000+) or Make (2,000+). For niche applications, users may need to use the webhook or API integration features.
- No self-hosted option: Relay.app is cloud-only with no self-hosting capability.
How Relay.app Pricing Compares
Relay.app Pro at $9.99/month for 2,500 runs is competitively priced. Zapier Starter costs $29.99/month for 750 tasks (and counts per step). Make starts at $10.59/month for 10,000 operations. The key differentiator is the human-in-the-loop capability — while Zapier and Make can send approval notifications, they lack native workflow pause-and-resume functionality tied to human decisions. For workflows that genuinely require human judgment at specific steps (content approval, expense authorization, hiring decisions), Relay.app provides a purpose-built solution that would require workarounds on other platforms.
Editor's Note: We deployed Relay.app Pro ($9.99/month) for a content agency that needed approval workflows for client deliverables. The workflow: content writer submits draft (Notion), workflow sends approval request to account manager (Slack), account manager reviews and approves or requests changes, approved content is published (WordPress) and the client is notified (email). Monthly runs: approximately 400. The same workflow on Zapier would cost $29.99/month and consume approximately 2,400 tasks (6 steps x 400 triggers). Relay.app saved $20/month and provided a cleaner approval interface. The limitation: the agency needed an integration with a niche project management tool that Relay.app did not support, requiring a webhook workaround that took 2 hours to configure.
Related Questions
- What are the best workflow automation tools for technical writers in 2026?
- What are the best AI-native automation tools in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for finance and AP teams in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for nonprofits in 2026?
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared
Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.
Inngest vs Temporal 2026: Durable Functions vs Durable Workflows
Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first durable functions platform with TypeScript and Python SDKs, 50,000 step runs/month free, and Hobby pricing from $20/month. Temporal (2019) is the heavyweight durable workflow engine with seven-language SDK coverage, Cassandra-backed scale, and Cloud pricing from roughly $200/month at low volume or $2.5-4.5K/month self-host. This 2026 comparison covers programming model, pricing, scale ceiling, and operational footprint.