How much does Power Automate cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: Power Automate pricing as of July 2026: Premium $15/user/month (cloud flows, 1,400+ premium connectors, and attended desktop RPA), Process $150/bot/month (unattended RPA), and Hosted Process $215/bot/month (Microsoft-hosted unattended). Process Mining is a separate add-on at $5,000/tenant/month. Cloud flows on standard connectors are included with Microsoft 365, so many organisations only pay for premium connectors and RPA.
Pricing Overview
Microsoft Power Automate's licensing varies by whether automation is per-user or per-bot and whether it includes desktop RPA. Many organisations already have partial access through Microsoft 365, which complicates the picture.
Power Automate Pricing (as of July 2026)
| Tier | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Power Automate (in Microsoft 365) | Included | Cloud flows on standard connectors only |
| Power Automate Premium | $15/user/mo | Cloud flows, standard + premium connectors, Dataverse, attended desktop RPA |
| Power Automate Process | $150/bot/mo | Unattended RPA, cloud flows scoped to the bot |
| Power Automate Hosted Process | $215/bot/mo | Microsoft-hosted unattended RPA (no self-managed machines) |
| Process Mining (add-on) | $5,000/tenant/mo | Process Mining, 100 GB — requires Premium |
Two corrections for 2026: attended desktop RPA (Power Automate Desktop) is now included in Premium at $15, rather than a separate $40 "Premium with RPA" plan, and Process Mining is a separate $5,000/tenant/month add-on, not a Premium feature. Power Automate now lists more than 1,400 prebuilt connectors (up from 1,000+).
What Each Plan Includes
Power Automate Premium ($15/user/mo)
Cloud automation with both standard connectors (SharePoint, Outlook, Teams) and premium connectors (Salesforce, SAP, Oracle), Dataverse storage (250 MB per user), attended desktop RPA via Power Automate Desktop, and AI Builder credits. This is the entry point for connecting to non-Microsoft services.
Power Automate Process ($150/bot/mo)
Unattended RPA where bots run on machines without human interaction. Each Process license includes cloud flows scoped to the bot. Used for high-volume, repetitive tasks like invoice processing and batch reporting.
Power Automate Hosted Process ($215/bot/mo)
The same unattended RPA on Microsoft-hosted machines, removing the need to manage your own VMs.
Hidden Costs and Considerations
- M365 included features are limited to standard connectors: any flow using a premium connector (Salesforce, SAP, custom) requires a Premium license at $15/user/month.
- Dataverse storage: the 250 MB per-user allocation fills quickly; additional storage is about $40/GB/month.
- AI Builder credits: the included allowance is shared across the tenant; heavy document/prediction use needs extra capacity.
- Process Mining: the $5,000/tenant/month add-on is a separate line item, not part of Premium.
How Power Automate Pricing Compares
Power Automate is competitive for organisations already on Microsoft. Zapier starts at $29.99/month but has no RPA; Make at $10.59/month offers more operations per dollar for pure cloud automation. UiPath's public self-serve Basic starts at $25/month (EU, up to 2 robots), with larger deployments quote-based. Power Automate's differentiator is native integration with Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365, and Azure without premium connectors.
Editor's Note: We deployed Power Automate for a 200-person financial services firm already on Microsoft 365 E3. The M365 license covered standard-connector flows at no extra cost. When they needed Salesforce integration, 15 users required Premium at $15/user ($225/month), and they later added 3 unattended bots for invoice processing at $150/bot ($450/month) — about $675/month incremental, against invoice work that previously took 1.5 FTEs. ROI payback was under three months; the surprise was Dataverse storage, which they exhausted in six weeks. Re-checked July 2026: attended desktop RPA is now bundled into Premium (the old $40 tier is gone), Hosted Process is $215/bot for teams that do not want to manage VMs, and Process Mining is a separate $5,000/tenant add-on — worth modelling the bot count first, because unattended RPA is still where the real spend lives. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
Power Automate
Microsoft workflow automation and RPA
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Dive Deeper
Client Portals vs Workflow Orchestration Platforms: What Changes When External Parties Act Inside a Process
What changes when a client or supplier has to act inside your process, not just watch it? This guide compares four client portals with four orchestration platforms on how outsiders get in, whether you pay for them and what the audit log records, from vendor sources read 14 and 15 September 2026.
Moxo vs Zapier in 2026: Human Approval Steps, External Participants and Pricing
Moxo and Zapier both put a person in front of an automated decision, from opposite ends: Moxo builds the process out of human steps and attaches AI, while Zapier pauses an automation for a reviewer through its Human in the Loop app. This guide compares approvers, rejection, AI approval, audit logs, governance and pricing, verified 14 and 15 September 2026.
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.