Is Make (Integromat) worth it in 2026?
Quick Answer: Yes, Make is worth it in 2026. It scores 8.5/10 overall with the best pricing value in the workflow automation market (free tier of 1,000 ops/month, paid from $9/month billed annually), a superior visual canvas builder, and strong data transformation capabilities. Make is the top recommendation for teams that need more than Zapier but do not require enterprise iPaaS. The main drawbacks are a moderate learning curve and enterprise features that are still catching up to dedicated iPaaS platforms.
Make (Integromat) Review 2026
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual workflow automation platform that consistently punches above its weight in features-per-dollar. After its acquisition by Celonis in 2020, Make has continued to invest in its visual builder, integration library, and enterprise features while maintaining competitive pricing that undercuts Zapier across every tier.
Overall Rating: 8.5/10
| Category | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 8/10 | Visual canvas is intuitive once learned; initial learning curve is moderate |
| Automation power | 9/10 | Routers, iterators, aggregators, and error handling built in |
| Integrations | 8/10 | 1,800+ app modules with deep API coverage |
| Pricing value | 9.5/10 | Best value in the market at every tier |
| Reliability | 8/10 | Generally stable; occasional execution delays during peak times |
| Documentation | 8/10 | Comprehensive docs and active community forum |
| Enterprise readiness | 7.5/10 | Growing but behind Workato and Tray.io for enterprise governance |
What Make Does Best
Visual Workflow Builder
Make's canvas-based scenario builder is the best visual automation interface in the market. Workflows are displayed as a visual flowchart where users can see data flowing between modules. This makes complex workflows with branching, loops, and error handling much easier to understand than list-based interfaces like Zapier.
Data Transformation
Make provides 150+ built-in functions for text manipulation, math, dates, arrays, and data conversion. Users can transform data inline without needing separate steps or code. This is significantly more powerful than Zapier's formatting options.
Pricing
Make offers the best value of any commercial automation platform:
- Free: 1,000 operations/month (vs Zapier's 100 tasks)
- Core ($9/month): 10,000 operations
- Pro ($16/month): 10,000 operations with advanced features
For comparison, Zapier's entry annual price of $19.99/month includes a much smaller task allowance.
Error Handling
Make has built-in error routes that let you define what happens when a step fails. Users can retry, ignore, commit partial data, or route to an alternative path. This level of error handling is not available in Zapier or IFTTT without workarounds.
Where Make Falls Short
Learning Curve
While powerful, Make's visual canvas takes more time to learn than Zapier's simple trigger-action model. New users often find the concepts of routers, iterators, and data mapping confusing at first. Budget 2-3 hours to become comfortable.
Enterprise Features
Make is still catching up to dedicated iPaaS platforms (Workato, Tray.io) on enterprise governance. Features like advanced role-based access, environment management, and compliance certifications are improving but not yet at parity.
Celonis Transition
The 2020 acquisition by Celonis has been mostly positive (continued investment, new features), but the long-term product strategy under Celonis ownership remains a consideration for teams making long-term platform commitments.
Who Should Use Make?
- Cost-conscious teams who want more than Zapier's free tier
- Visual thinkers who prefer seeing workflow logic as a flowchart
- Data-heavy workflows that need inline transformation and aggregation
- Mid-market companies that need power beyond Zapier but do not require enterprise iPaaS
Who Should Look Elsewhere?
- Complete beginners may find Zapier easier to start with
- Developers who want code-first control should consider n8n or Pipedream
- Large enterprises needing deep governance should evaluate Workato or Tray.io
Bottom Line
Make is the best value workflow automation platform in 2026. Its visual builder, data transformation capabilities, and aggressive pricing make it the top recommendation for teams that have outgrown simple trigger-action automations but do not need enterprise iPaaS. For organizations currently on Zapier and finding it expensive, Make should be a first alternative to evaluate.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Make
Automate your work with visual workflow builder and AI agents
Workflow AutomationZapier
Automate workflows between apps without coding—connect 9,000+ tools with simple, reliable automation.
Workflow Automationn8n
Workflow automation for technical teams
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9, Kissflow 5.8 and ServiceNow 4.8, scored 22 September 2026 on the five weighted criteria. Those criteria cover the step type, the approver's account or licence, the routes available on a rejection, the audit record, and the meter that charges for the decision, and none of them can tell a review from a rubber stamp, so the methodology adds a check readers can run on any product in a few minutes: whether the decision record tells a considered approval from an instant one. Every figure was read from a vendor-owned surface and carries its own date.
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Dive Deeper
Moxo vs Lindy in 2026: Who Presses Approve When the Agent Asks
Lindy, founded in 2023, sells an AI teammate that lives in Slack and in each person's inbox; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs multi-party processes where approvals are steps only a person can close. Moxo wins three rounds to two: who closes the step, work across companies and the record. Lindy wins reach and testing. Vendor pages and docs read 28 September 2026.
Moxo vs Kissflow in 2026: What an Outside Approver Costs, and What the Record Proves
Moxo and Kissflow both sell approvals to people who do not write code, and each wins one round outright: Moxo's Web and Headless SDKs run the approval inside the buyer's own product, under the buyer's own sign-in. Kissflow's portal audit log stamps every event with an actor, a device and an IP, where Moxo publishes no field list. Both answers are quoted, not priced, and both meters punish a one-step request sent to hundreds of clients. Cost, the decision record, rejection routes, AI metering and governance, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.
Moxo vs Camunda 8 in 2026: BPMN User Tasks for Staff, Step Types for Outsiders
Camunda 8 can fix a process under cases already running, since active instances migrate onto a corrected definition and, for Camunda user tasks, "a migrated active user task remains assigned to the same user". Moxo keeps the shared queue that Camunda's Tasklist V2 stops evaluating, with desks that are "a shared inbox that multiple users can pick work from". Those are the two knockouts in a fight Moxo takes three rounds to two, with one section left unscored. Portability, AI review gates and a published price decide the rest, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.