How does Make's pricing compare to Zapier in 2026?
Quick Answer: Make is significantly cheaper than Zapier at every tier. Make's free plan includes 1,000 operations/month versus Zapier's 100 tasks. At the paid entry level, Make charges $9/month billed annually for 10,000 operations while Zapier's entry annual price of $19.99/month includes a much smaller task allowance. For teams running 50,000+ automations monthly, Make can be 3-5x cheaper.
Make vs Zapier Pricing: A Complete Cost Comparison
Make (formerly Integromat) and Zapier are the two most popular hosted automation platforms, but their pricing models work very differently. Understanding these differences can save the team hundreds or thousands of dollars per year.
Understanding the Pricing Models
Zapier charges per task. A task is consumed every time an action step runs in your Zap. Trigger and filter steps are free, but each action step in a multi-step Zap counts individually. A 5-step Zap running once consumes 4 tasks.
Make charges per operation. An operation is consumed when a module processes a bundle of data. The key difference: Make's operations tend to cover more ground per unit because Make's modules are more granular and each data bundle processed counts as one operation.
Side-by-Side Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Make | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | 1,000 ops/month, 2 scenarios | 100 tasks/month |
| Entry Paid | $9/month for 10,000 ops | $19.99/month (annual), smaller allowance |
| Mid Tier | $16/month for 10,000 ops + more features | Higher Zapier tiers (allowances scale with price) |
| Team Tier | $29/month for 10,000 ops + teams | ~$69/month per user (annual) + teams |
| High Volume | $99/month for 40,000 ops | High Zapier tiers (custom) |
| Multi-Step Workflows | Included on all plans | Paid plans only |
| Minimum Polling Interval | 1 minute (paid) | 1 minute (paid) |
Cost at Different Scales
Here is what each platform costs at various usage levels:
| Monthly Usage | Make Cost | Zapier Cost | Savings with Make |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 actions | Free | ~$20-30 (entry plan) | $19.99/month |
| 5,000 actions | $9/month billed annually | Higher Zapier tiers | $40/month |
| 10,000 actions | $9/month | $99/month | $90/month |
| 25,000 actions | $29/month | $159/month | $130/month |
| 50,000 actions | $99/month | High Zapier tiers (custom) | $200/month |
| 100,000 actions | $159/month | $599/month | $440/month |
Note: Exact costs vary based on plan features and annual vs monthly billing. Task/operation counts are approximate equivalents.
Operations vs Tasks: Why Make Is Cheaper
The pricing gap comes from fundamental model differences. In Zapier, a 5-step Zap that processes 100 records uses 400 tasks (4 action steps times 100). In Make, the same workflow might use 500 operations, but Make's per-operation cost is dramatically lower. At the entry paid tier, Zapier costs $0.027 per task while Make costs $0.0009 per operation.
Make also includes multi-step scenarios on its free plan, while Zapier's free tier is more restrictive on multi-step automation. This alone makes Make the stronger free option for multi-step automations.
When Zapier Is Still the Better Value
- App coverage matters most: Zapier supports 9,000+ apps vs Make's 3,000+ (mid-2026). If a critical app is only on Zapier, the premium may be worth it.
- Ease of use is paramount: Zapier's linear builder is faster for simple trigger-action workflows.
- Enterprise requirements: Zapier's enterprise plan offers SAML SSO, advanced admin controls, and dedicated account management that some organizations require.
When Make Wins on Price
- Any volume above 1,000 operations/month: Make's free tier alone can exceed Zapier's entry-plan allowance
- Multi-step workflows: included free on Make, paid-only on Zapier
- Data-heavy automations: Make's visual router and data transformation tools mean fewer modules needed
- Teams scaling up: the cost gap widens dramatically at higher volumes, saving $200-$400/month at 50,000+ operations
Related Questions
Related Tools
Make
Automate your work with visual workflow builder and AI agents
Workflow AutomationZapier
Automate workflows between apps without coding—connect 9,000+ tools with simple, reliable automation.
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9…
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two…
Dive Deeper
Moxo vs Gumloop in 2026: Texting the Client, or Building the Agent
Gumloop (founded 2023) builds AI agents a company's own staff run; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs processes that wait on people outside the company. Gumloop wins three rounds to two: the way in, per-tool gating and a priced overage. Moxo wins on…
Moxo vs Relay.app in 2026: Where Relay's Approval Workflows Can Go Next
Relay.app, founded in 2021, shut down in September 2026 and deleted every account, workflow and run history; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, is one destination for its human-in-the-loop users. Relay.app takes two rounds, Moxo one, and vendor risk is a draw…
Moxo vs Workato in 2026: The Integration Estate, or the Approval Inside It
Workato, founded in 2013, is an enterprise integration platform whose Workflow apps add human tasks to recipes; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, ships the human step itself. Workato wins three rounds to two: connector reach, change control and the way in…