How much does Make cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: Make offers a free tier with 1,000 operations/month and 2 active scenarios. Paid plans start at $9/month (Core) for 10,000 operations, with Pro at $16/month, Teams at $29/month, and custom Enterprise pricing available. Information current as of March 2026.
Make Pricing Tiers (as of Q1 2026)
Make (formerly Integromat) uses an operations-based pricing model across five tiers. All paid plans are billed monthly or annually, with annual billing providing a discount of roughly 15-20%.
| Plan | Monthly Price | Operations/Month | Active Scenarios | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1,000 | 2 | Basic integrations, 5-minute scheduling interval |
| Core | $9 | 10,000 | Unlimited | 1-minute scheduling, basic operations log |
| Pro | $16 | 10,000 | Unlimited | Custom variables, full-text execution log, priority execution |
| Teams | $29 | 10,000 | Unlimited | Team roles, shared scenarios, high-priority execution |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Unlimited | SSO/SAML, dedicated support, SLA, custom limits |
Additional operations can be purchased on all paid plans. The Core, Pro, and Teams tiers all start at 10,000 operations but differ in feature access, execution priority, and team collaboration capabilities.
How Make's Operations Model Works
Make counts each module execution within a scenario as one operation. A scenario with five modules that runs once consumes five operations. This differs from Zapier's task model, where each action step in a Zap counts as one task.
The practical difference: a Make scenario with a trigger plus four action modules uses 5 operations per run. An equivalent Zapier Zap uses 4 tasks per run (triggers are free in Zapier). However, Make's base allocation of 10,000 operations at $9/month is substantially more generous than Zapier's 750 tasks at $19.99/month.
Cost Comparison with Competitors
| Platform | Entry Price | Included Volume | Cost per Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Make Core | $9/mo | 10,000 operations | $0.0009/op |
| Zapier Starter | $19.99/mo | 750 tasks | $0.027/task |
| n8n Cloud Starter | $20/mo | 2,500 executions | $0.008/exec |
| n8n Self-Hosted | Free | Unlimited | $0 (server costs only) |
At equivalent volumes, Make consistently costs less than Zapier. For teams processing 10,000+ actions per month, Make's per-operation cost is roughly 30x lower than Zapier's per-task cost on entry-tier plans. n8n self-hosted eliminates per-execution costs entirely but requires infrastructure management.
Free Tier Limitations
Make's free tier includes 1,000 operations per month and a maximum of 2 active scenarios. The scheduling interval is limited to 5 minutes (versus 1 minute on paid plans). Data transfer is capped at 100 MB, and execution history is retained for 7 days. These constraints make the free tier suitable for testing and personal projects but insufficient for production business workflows.
Editor's Note: We tracked costs for a mid-market SaaS client running 23 scenarios processing ~2,300 operations/day. At that volume, Make Teams was $348/mo. The operations model meant multi-step scenarios cost less than equivalent Zapier Zaps since Make counts module executions, not entire workflow runs. One caveat: the free tier's 1,000 operations per month lasted this client less than half a day in testing, so expect to move to a paid plan immediately for any real workload.
When to Upgrade
The Core plan at $9/month covers most small business needs. Pro ($16/month) is worth the upgrade for teams that need detailed execution logs for debugging. Teams ($29/month) becomes necessary when multiple users collaborate on shared scenarios with role-based permissions. Enterprise pricing requires contacting Make's sales team and typically applies to organizations needing SSO, SLA guarantees, or custom operation volumes above 100,000/month.
Related Questions
- What are the best workflow automation tools for technical writers in 2026?
- What are the best AI-native automation tools in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for finance and AP teams in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for nonprofits in 2026?
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared
Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.
Inngest vs Temporal 2026: Durable Functions vs Durable Workflows
Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first durable functions platform with TypeScript and Python SDKs, 50,000 step runs/month free, and Hobby pricing from $20/month. Temporal (2019) is the heavyweight durable workflow engine with seven-language SDK coverage, Cassandra-backed scale, and Cloud pricing from roughly $200/month at low volume or $2.5-4.5K/month self-host. This 2026 comparison covers programming model, pricing, scale ceiling, and operational footprint.