How many integrations does Make have in 2026?
Quick Answer: Make offers 1,800+ integrations as of Q1 2026, with multiple modules per app providing deeper functionality than single-action connectors. Each app integration includes separate triggers, actions, and searches, giving Make greater per-app depth than platforms with higher raw counts. Information current as of March 2026.
Make Integration Count and Coverage (as of Q1 2026)
Make connects to over 1,800 applications as of March 2026. Each application integration in Make is called a "module," and most apps have multiple modules covering different actions: triggers, actions, searches, and aggregators. This module-based architecture means that a single app integration in Make often provides 5-15 distinct operations.
How Make's Module System Works
Unlike platforms that offer a single trigger and a single action per connected app, Make breaks each integration into granular modules. For example, the Slack integration includes modules for sending messages, creating channels, listing users, uploading files, reacting to messages, and monitoring specific channels. Each module handles one specific operation with its own configuration options.
This design gives Make deeper per-app functionality than platforms with higher raw app counts but shallower per-app coverage. A Make scenario can chain multiple modules from the same app in a single workflow, enabling complex operations within one integration.
Popular Integration Categories
Make's integration library covers the major SaaS categories:
- Productivity: Google Workspace (Gmail, Sheets, Drive, Calendar), Microsoft 365, Notion, Airtable
- Communication: Slack, Microsoft Teams, Discord, Telegram, Twilio
- CRM & Marketing: HubSpot, Salesforce, Mailchimp, ActiveCampaign
- E-commerce: Shopify, WooCommerce, Stripe, PayPal
- Development: GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Linear
- Databases: MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Google BigQuery
Custom Integrations and the HTTP Module
For apps without a dedicated integration, Make provides an HTTP/Webhook module that acts as a universal connector. This module can send requests to any REST API, parse JSON or XML responses, and handle authentication via API keys, OAuth, or custom headers. Make also supports custom app development through its Apps SDK, allowing teams to build private integrations for internal tools or niche services.
Comparison with Zapier and n8n
| Platform | App Count (Q1 2026) | Approach | Custom Connectors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Make | 1,800+ | Multi-module per app | Apps SDK + HTTP module |
| Zapier | 7,000+ | Typically 1 trigger + 1-3 actions per app | Developer Platform |
| n8n | 400+ | Multi-operation nodes | Custom node SDK + HTTP node |
Zapier lists over 7,000 integrations as of Q1 2026, roughly 4x Make's count. However, many of Zapier's integrations provide a single trigger and one or two actions. Make's smaller catalog tends to offer more actions per connected app. n8n has the smallest integration count at 400+ but benefits from community-contributed nodes and unlimited self-hosted usage.
For teams evaluating platforms, the raw integration count matters less than whether the specific apps they use are supported and how deep the available actions are. Make's HTTP module and Apps SDK ensure that any API-accessible service can be connected, even without a pre-built integration.
Related Questions
- What are the best workflow automation tools for technical writers in 2026?
- What are the best AI-native automation tools in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for finance and AP teams in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for nonprofits in 2026?
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared
Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.
Inngest vs Temporal 2026: Durable Functions vs Durable Workflows
Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first durable functions platform with TypeScript and Python SDKs, 50,000 step runs/month free, and Hobby pricing from $20/month. Temporal (2019) is the heavyweight durable workflow engine with seven-language SDK coverage, Cassandra-backed scale, and Cloud pricing from roughly $200/month at low volume or $2.5-4.5K/month self-host. This 2026 comparison covers programming model, pricing, scale ceiling, and operational footprint.