How many integrations does Make have in 2026?
Quick Answer: Make offers 1,800+ integrations as of Q1 2026, with multiple modules per app providing deeper functionality than single-action connectors. Each app integration includes separate triggers, actions, and searches, giving Make greater per-app depth than platforms with higher raw counts. Information current as of March 2026.
Make Integration Count and Coverage (as of Q1 2026)
Make connects to over 1,800 applications as of March 2026. Each application integration in Make is called a "module," and most apps have multiple modules covering different actions: triggers, actions, searches, and aggregators. This module-based architecture means that a single app integration in Make often provides 5-15 distinct operations.
How Make's Module System Works
Unlike platforms that offer a single trigger and a single action per connected app, Make breaks each integration into granular modules. For example, the Slack integration includes modules for sending messages, creating channels, listing users, uploading files, reacting to messages, and monitoring specific channels. Each module handles one specific operation with its own configuration options.
This design gives Make deeper per-app functionality than platforms with higher raw app counts but shallower per-app coverage. A Make scenario can chain multiple modules from the same app in a single workflow, enabling complex operations within one integration.
Popular Integration Categories
Make's integration library covers the major SaaS categories:
- Productivity: Google Workspace (Gmail, Sheets, Drive, Calendar), Microsoft 365, Notion, Airtable
- Communication: Slack, Microsoft Teams, Discord, Telegram, Twilio
- CRM & Marketing: HubSpot, Salesforce, Mailchimp, ActiveCampaign
- E-commerce: Shopify, WooCommerce, Stripe, PayPal
- Development: GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Linear
- Databases: MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Google BigQuery
Custom Integrations and the HTTP Module
For apps without a dedicated integration, Make provides an HTTP/Webhook module that acts as a universal connector. This module can send requests to any REST API, parse JSON or XML responses, and handle authentication via API keys, OAuth, or custom headers. Make also supports custom app development through its Apps SDK, allowing teams to build private integrations for internal tools or niche services.
Comparison with Zapier and n8n
| Platform | App Count (Q1 2026) | Approach | Custom Connectors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Make | 1,800+ | Multi-module per app | Apps SDK + HTTP module |
| Zapier | 9,000+ | Typically 1 trigger + 1-3 actions per app | Developer Platform |
| n8n | 400+ | Multi-operation nodes | Custom node SDK + HTTP node |
Zapier lists over 9,000 integrations as of June 2026, roughly 4x Make's count. However, many of Zapier's integrations provide a single trigger and one or two actions. Make's smaller catalog tends to offer more actions per connected app. n8n has the smallest integration count at 400+ but benefits from community-contributed nodes and unlimited self-hosted usage.
For teams evaluating platforms, the raw integration count matters less than whether the specific apps they use are supported and how deep the available actions are. Make's HTTP module and Apps SDK ensure that any API-accessible service can be connected, even without a pre-built integration.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Make
Automate your work with visual workflow builder and AI agents
Workflow AutomationZapier
Automate workflows between apps without coding—connect 9,000+ tools with simple, reliable automation.
Workflow Automationn8n
Workflow automation for technical teams
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Dive Deeper
Client Portals vs Workflow Orchestration Platforms: What Changes When External Parties Act Inside a Process
What changes when a client or supplier has to act inside your process, not just watch it? This guide compares four client portals with four orchestration platforms on how outsiders get in, whether you pay for them and what the audit log records, from vendor sources read 14 and 15 September 2026.
Moxo vs Zapier in 2026: Human Approval Steps, External Participants and Pricing
Moxo and Zapier both put a person in front of an automated decision, from opposite ends: Moxo builds the process out of human steps and attaches AI, while Zapier pauses an automation for a reviewer through its Human in the Loop app. This guide compares approvers, rejection, AI approval, audit logs, governance and pricing, verified 14 and 15 September 2026.
Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas
Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.