What does IFTTT cost in 2026? Pricing tiers and plans explained

Quick Answer: IFTTT offers a free plan with 2 active applets. Pro costs $2.99/month (annual billing) for 20 applets with multi-action support, and Pro+ costs $14.99/month for unlimited applets. IFTTT is the least expensive consumer automation platform as of March 2026.

Pricing Overview

IFTTT (If This Then That) is a consumer-focused automation platform that pioneered the trigger-action model for connecting apps and devices. The platform uses an applet-based pricing model with a limited free tier and two paid plans. IFTTT differentiates itself from enterprise automation tools by focusing on personal productivity, smart home automation, and IoT device connectivity.

IFTTT Pricing Tiers (as of March 2026)

Tier Price Key Features
Free $0 (2 applets) 2 active applets, standard speed, basic support
Pro $2.99/month (annual billing) 20 active applets, multi-action applets, faster polling, filter code
Pro+ $14.99/month Unlimited applets, multi-account connections, faster polling, priority support

What Each Plan Includes

Free

The free plan allows 2 active applets (automations). Users can choose from IFTTT's library of pre-built applets or create custom ones. The free tier uses standard polling speed (typically checking triggers every 15 minutes for non-webhook services) and provides access to IFTTT's full service directory of 800+ connected services. The 2-applet limit is IFTTT's most significant restriction — most users find this insufficient for practical automation.

Pro

The Pro plan at $2.99 per month (billed annually) increases the active applet limit to 20 and adds multi-action applets (a single trigger can execute multiple actions in sequence), filter code with JavaScript for conditional logic, and faster polling intervals. Multi-action applets were previously the core differentiator between free and paid tiers.

Pro+

The Pro+ plan at $14.99 per month (billed annually) removes the applet limit entirely and adds the ability to connect multiple accounts for the same service (for example, 2 Gmail accounts), faster trigger polling, and priority customer support. This tier also includes queries — the ability to pull additional data into applets from connected services.

Hidden Costs and Considerations

  • Polling delay: Even on paid plans, IFTTT checks non-webhook triggers at intervals (typically 1-15 minutes). This makes IFTTT unsuitable for time-sensitive automations that require near-instant execution.
  • Limited complexity: IFTTT applets follow a simple trigger-action model. There is no support for branching logic, loops, data transformation, or multi-step conditional workflows. Users needing complex automation should consider Zapier or Make instead.
  • Service availability: While IFTTT connects to 1,000+ services, the depth of integration varies. Many services offer only 1-3 triggers and actions, compared to Zapier's deeper integrations that may offer 10-20+ triggers and actions per service.
  • IFTTT Connect (B2B): IFTTT also offers a Connect platform for businesses that want to embed IFTTT integrations into their own products. Connect pricing is separate from consumer plans and negotiated per deployment.

How IFTTT Pricing Compares

IFTTT is the least expensive paid automation platform in the market. At $2.99/month (annual billing) for Pro, it costs less than a single month of Zapier's cheapest paid plan ($29.99/month). However, the comparison is misleading because IFTTT and Zapier serve different use cases. Zapier supports multi-step workflows with conditional logic, data formatting, and 9,000+ integrations at varying depths. IFTTT is designed for simple trigger-action automations, particularly in the smart home and IoT space. For users who need only basic automations (save Gmail attachments to Google Drive, post Instagram photos to Twitter, turn on smart lights at sunset), IFTTT provides adequate functionality at a fraction of Zapier's cost.

Editor's Note: We evaluated IFTTT Pro+ ($14.99/month) for a small marketing team that needed to automate social media cross-posting and lead notifications. The team set up 8 applets connecting Instagram, Twitter, Slack, and Google Sheets. Total monthly cost: $14.99. The same workflows on Zapier would have cost $29.99/month (Starter plan). However, after 3 months, the team needed conditional logic (only post to Twitter if the Instagram caption contained certain hashtags), which IFTTT cannot handle natively. They migrated to Make at $10.59/month, which provided both the conditional logic and higher execution volume. IFTTT works well for its intended purpose — simple personal and smart home automation — but teams quickly outgrow it when business requirements become more complex.

Related Questions

Written & reviewed by Rafal Fila · Last updated:

Related Tools

Related Rankings

Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026

This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.

Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026

A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.

Dive Deeper

guide

Client Portals vs Workflow Orchestration Platforms: What Changes When External Parties Act Inside a Process

What changes when a client or supplier has to act inside your process, not just watch it? This guide compares four client portals with four orchestration platforms on how outsiders get in, whether you pay for them and what the audit log records, from vendor sources read 14 and 15 September 2026.

comparison

Moxo vs Zapier in 2026: Human Approval Steps, External Participants and Pricing

Moxo and Zapier both put a person in front of an automated decision, from opposite ends: Moxo builds the process out of human steps and attaches AI, while Zapier pauses an automation for a reviewer through its Human in the Loop app. This guide compares approvers, rejection, AI approval, audit logs, governance and pricing, verified 14 and 15 September 2026.

comparison

Keystroke vs n8n in 2026: Agent-Built TypeScript vs the Visual Canvas

Keystroke, launched in July 2026 by Y Combinator W24 company Sprint Labs, is a code-first automation platform where AI coding agents write workflows as TypeScript in the user's repository. n8n, founded in 2019, is the most widely deployed source-available visual workflow platform, with 200,000+ users and a $2.5 billion valuation. This comparison covers the agent-authored versus canvas building models, durable execution, licensing (Elastic License 2.0 vs the Sustainable Use License), verified July 2026 pricing including Keystroke's usage metering, and the maturity gap between a days-old platform and an established ecosystem.