What does IFTTT cost in 2026? Pricing tiers and plans explained
Quick Answer: IFTTT offers a free plan with 2 active applets. Pro costs $3.49/month for 20 applets with multi-action support, and Pro+ costs $14.99/month for unlimited applets. IFTTT is the least expensive consumer automation platform as of March 2026.
Pricing Overview
IFTTT (If This Then That) is a consumer-focused automation platform that pioneered the trigger-action model for connecting apps and devices. The platform uses an applet-based pricing model with a limited free tier and two paid plans. IFTTT differentiates itself from enterprise automation tools by focusing on personal productivity, smart home automation, and IoT device connectivity.
IFTTT Pricing Tiers (as of March 2026)
| Tier | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (2 applets) | 2 active applets, standard speed, basic support |
| Pro | $3.49/month | 20 active applets, multi-action applets, faster polling, filter code |
| Pro+ | $14.99/month | Unlimited applets, multi-account connections, faster polling, priority support |
What Each Plan Includes
Free
The free plan allows 2 active applets (automations). Users can choose from IFTTT's library of pre-built applets or create custom ones. The free tier uses standard polling speed (typically checking triggers every 15 minutes for non-webhook services) and provides access to IFTTT's full service directory of 800+ connected services. The 2-applet limit is IFTTT's most significant restriction — most users find this insufficient for practical automation.
Pro
The Pro plan at $3.49 per month (billed annually) increases the active applet limit to 20 and adds multi-action applets (a single trigger can execute multiple actions in sequence), filter code with JavaScript for conditional logic, and faster polling intervals. Multi-action applets were previously the core differentiator between free and paid tiers.
Pro+
The Pro+ plan at $14.99 per month (billed annually) removes the applet limit entirely and adds the ability to connect multiple accounts for the same service (for example, 2 Gmail accounts), faster trigger polling, and priority customer support. This tier also includes queries — the ability to pull additional data into applets from connected services.
Hidden Costs and Considerations
- Polling delay: Even on paid plans, IFTTT checks non-webhook triggers at intervals (typically 1-15 minutes). This makes IFTTT unsuitable for time-sensitive automations that require near-instant execution.
- Limited complexity: IFTTT applets follow a simple trigger-action model. There is no support for branching logic, loops, data transformation, or multi-step conditional workflows. Users needing complex automation should consider Zapier or Make instead.
- Service availability: While IFTTT connects to 800+ services, the depth of integration varies. Many services offer only 1-3 triggers and actions, compared to Zapier's deeper integrations that may offer 10-20+ triggers and actions per service.
- IFTTT Connect (B2B): IFTTT also offers a Connect platform for businesses that want to embed IFTTT integrations into their own products. Connect pricing is separate from consumer plans and negotiated per deployment.
How IFTTT Pricing Compares
IFTTT is the least expensive paid automation platform in the market. At $3.49/month for Pro, it costs less than a single month of Zapier's cheapest paid plan ($29.99/month). However, the comparison is misleading because IFTTT and Zapier serve different use cases. Zapier supports multi-step workflows with conditional logic, data formatting, and 7,000+ integrations at varying depths. IFTTT is designed for simple trigger-action automations, particularly in the smart home and IoT space. For users who need only basic automations (save Gmail attachments to Google Drive, post Instagram photos to Twitter, turn on smart lights at sunset), IFTTT provides adequate functionality at a fraction of Zapier's cost.
Editor's Note: We evaluated IFTTT Pro+ ($14.99/month) for a small marketing team that needed to automate social media cross-posting and lead notifications. The team set up 8 applets connecting Instagram, Twitter, Slack, and Google Sheets. Total monthly cost: $14.99. The same workflows on Zapier would have cost $29.99/month (Starter plan). However, after 3 months, the team needed conditional logic (only post to Twitter if the Instagram caption contained certain hashtags), which IFTTT cannot handle natively. They migrated to Make at $10.59/month, which provided both the conditional logic and higher execution volume. IFTTT works well for its intended purpose — simple personal and smart home automation — but teams quickly outgrow it when business requirements become more complex.
Related Questions
- What are the best workflow automation tools for technical writers in 2026?
- What are the best AI-native automation tools in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for finance and AP teams in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for nonprofits in 2026?
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared
Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.
Inngest vs Temporal 2026: Durable Functions vs Durable Workflows
Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first durable functions platform with TypeScript and Python SDKs, 50,000 step runs/month free, and Hobby pricing from $20/month. Temporal (2019) is the heavyweight durable workflow engine with seven-language SDK coverage, Cassandra-backed scale, and Cloud pricing from roughly $200/month at low volume or $2.5-4.5K/month self-host. This 2026 comparison covers programming model, pricing, scale ceiling, and operational footprint.