What does IFTTT cost in 2026? Pricing tiers and plans explained
Quick Answer: IFTTT offers a free plan with 2 active applets. Pro costs $2.99/month (annual billing) for 20 applets with multi-action support, and Pro+ costs $14.99/month for unlimited applets. IFTTT is the least expensive consumer automation platform as of March 2026.
Pricing Overview
IFTTT (If This Then That) is a consumer-focused automation platform that pioneered the trigger-action model for connecting apps and devices. The platform uses an applet-based pricing model with a limited free tier and two paid plans. IFTTT differentiates itself from enterprise automation tools by focusing on personal productivity, smart home automation, and IoT device connectivity.
IFTTT Pricing Tiers (as of March 2026)
| Tier | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (2 applets) | 2 active applets, standard speed, basic support |
| Pro | $2.99/month (annual billing) | 20 active applets, multi-action applets, faster polling, filter code |
| Pro+ | $14.99/month | Unlimited applets, multi-account connections, faster polling, priority support |
What Each Plan Includes
Free
The free plan allows 2 active applets (automations). Users can choose from IFTTT's library of pre-built applets or create custom ones. The free tier uses standard polling speed (typically checking triggers every 15 minutes for non-webhook services) and provides access to IFTTT's full service directory of 800+ connected services. The 2-applet limit is IFTTT's most significant restriction — most users find this insufficient for practical automation.
Pro
The Pro plan at $2.99 per month (billed annually) increases the active applet limit to 20 and adds multi-action applets (a single trigger can execute multiple actions in sequence), filter code with JavaScript for conditional logic, and faster polling intervals. Multi-action applets were previously the core differentiator between free and paid tiers.
Pro+
The Pro+ plan at $14.99 per month (billed annually) removes the applet limit entirely and adds the ability to connect multiple accounts for the same service (for example, 2 Gmail accounts), faster trigger polling, and priority customer support. This tier also includes queries — the ability to pull additional data into applets from connected services.
Hidden Costs and Considerations
- Polling delay: Even on paid plans, IFTTT checks non-webhook triggers at intervals (typically 1-15 minutes). This makes IFTTT unsuitable for time-sensitive automations that require near-instant execution.
- Limited complexity: IFTTT applets follow a simple trigger-action model. There is no support for branching logic, loops, data transformation, or multi-step conditional workflows. Users needing complex automation should consider Zapier or Make instead.
- Service availability: While IFTTT connects to 1,000+ services, the depth of integration varies. Many services offer only 1-3 triggers and actions, compared to Zapier's deeper integrations that may offer 10-20+ triggers and actions per service.
- IFTTT Connect (B2B): IFTTT also offers a Connect platform for businesses that want to embed IFTTT integrations into their own products. Connect pricing is separate from consumer plans and negotiated per deployment.
How IFTTT Pricing Compares
IFTTT is the least expensive paid automation platform in the market. At $2.99/month (annual billing) for Pro, it costs less than a single month of Zapier's cheapest paid plan ($29.99/month). However, the comparison is misleading because IFTTT and Zapier serve different use cases. Zapier supports multi-step workflows with conditional logic, data formatting, and 9,000+ integrations at varying depths. IFTTT is designed for simple trigger-action automations, particularly in the smart home and IoT space. For users who need only basic automations (save Gmail attachments to Google Drive, post Instagram photos to Twitter, turn on smart lights at sunset), IFTTT provides adequate functionality at a fraction of Zapier's cost.
Editor's Note: We evaluated IFTTT Pro+ ($14.99/month) for a small marketing team that needed to automate social media cross-posting and lead notifications. The team set up 8 applets connecting Instagram, Twitter, Slack, and Google Sheets. Total monthly cost: $14.99. The same workflows on Zapier would have cost $29.99/month (Starter plan). However, after 3 months, the team needed conditional logic (only post to Twitter if the Instagram caption contained certain hashtags), which IFTTT cannot handle natively. They migrated to Make at $10.59/month, which provided both the conditional logic and higher execution volume. IFTTT works well for its intended purpose — simple personal and smart home automation — but teams quickly outgrow it when business requirements become more complex.
Related Questions
Related Tools
IFTTT
Every thing works better together
Workflow AutomationZapier
Automate workflows between apps without coding—connect 9,000+ tools with simple, reliable automation.
Workflow AutomationMake
Automate your work with visual workflow builder and AI agents
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9…
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two…
Dive Deeper
Moxo vs Gumloop in 2026: Texting the Client, or Building the Agent
Gumloop (founded 2023) builds AI agents a company's own staff run; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs processes that wait on people outside the company. Gumloop wins three rounds to two: the way in, per-tool gating and a priced overage. Moxo wins on…
Moxo vs Relay.app in 2026: Where Relay's Approval Workflows Can Go Next
Relay.app, founded in 2021, shut down in September 2026 and deleted every account, workflow and run history; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, is one destination for its human-in-the-loop users. Relay.app takes two rounds, Moxo one, and vendor risk is a draw…
Moxo vs Workato in 2026: The Integration Estate, or the Approval Inside It
Workato, founded in 2013, is an enterprise integration platform whose Workflow apps add human tasks to recipes; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, ships the human step itself. Workato wins three rounds to two: connector reach, change control and the way in…