What does IFTTT cost in 2026? Pricing tiers and plans explained
Quick Answer: IFTTT offers a free plan with 2 active applets. Pro costs $2.99/month (annual billing) for 20 applets with multi-action support, and Pro+ costs $14.99/month for unlimited applets. IFTTT is the least expensive consumer automation platform as of March 2026.
Pricing Overview
IFTTT (If This Then That) is a consumer-focused automation platform that pioneered the trigger-action model for connecting apps and devices. The platform uses an applet-based pricing model with a limited free tier and two paid plans. IFTTT differentiates itself from enterprise automation tools by focusing on personal productivity, smart home automation, and IoT device connectivity.
IFTTT Pricing Tiers (as of March 2026)
| Tier | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (2 applets) | 2 active applets, standard speed, basic support |
| Pro | $2.99/month (annual billing) | 20 active applets, multi-action applets, faster polling, filter code |
| Pro+ | $14.99/month | Unlimited applets, multi-account connections, faster polling, priority support |
What Each Plan Includes
Free
The free plan allows 2 active applets (automations). Users can choose from IFTTT's library of pre-built applets or create custom ones. The free tier uses standard polling speed (typically checking triggers every 15 minutes for non-webhook services) and provides access to IFTTT's full service directory of 800+ connected services. The 2-applet limit is IFTTT's most significant restriction — most users find this insufficient for practical automation.
Pro
The Pro plan at $2.99 per month (billed annually) increases the active applet limit to 20 and adds multi-action applets (a single trigger can execute multiple actions in sequence), filter code with JavaScript for conditional logic, and faster polling intervals. Multi-action applets were previously the core differentiator between free and paid tiers.
Pro+
The Pro+ plan at $14.99 per month (billed annually) removes the applet limit entirely and adds the ability to connect multiple accounts for the same service (for example, 2 Gmail accounts), faster trigger polling, and priority customer support. This tier also includes queries — the ability to pull additional data into applets from connected services.
Hidden Costs and Considerations
- Polling delay: Even on paid plans, IFTTT checks non-webhook triggers at intervals (typically 1-15 minutes). This makes IFTTT unsuitable for time-sensitive automations that require near-instant execution.
- Limited complexity: IFTTT applets follow a simple trigger-action model. There is no support for branching logic, loops, data transformation, or multi-step conditional workflows. Users needing complex automation should consider Zapier or Make instead.
- Service availability: While IFTTT connects to 1,000+ services, the depth of integration varies. Many services offer only 1-3 triggers and actions, compared to Zapier's deeper integrations that may offer 10-20+ triggers and actions per service.
- IFTTT Connect (B2B): IFTTT also offers a Connect platform for businesses that want to embed IFTTT integrations into their own products. Connect pricing is separate from consumer plans and negotiated per deployment.
How IFTTT Pricing Compares
IFTTT is the least expensive paid automation platform in the market. At $2.99/month (annual billing) for Pro, it costs less than a single month of Zapier's cheapest paid plan ($29.99/month). However, the comparison is misleading because IFTTT and Zapier serve different use cases. Zapier supports multi-step workflows with conditional logic, data formatting, and 9,000+ integrations at varying depths. IFTTT is designed for simple trigger-action automations, particularly in the smart home and IoT space. For users who need only basic automations (save Gmail attachments to Google Drive, post Instagram photos to Twitter, turn on smart lights at sunset), IFTTT provides adequate functionality at a fraction of Zapier's cost.
Editor's Note: We evaluated IFTTT Pro+ ($14.99/month) for a small marketing team that needed to automate social media cross-posting and lead notifications. The team set up 8 applets connecting Instagram, Twitter, Slack, and Google Sheets. Total monthly cost: $14.99. The same workflows on Zapier would have cost $29.99/month (Starter plan). However, after 3 months, the team needed conditional logic (only post to Twitter if the Instagram caption contained certain hashtags), which IFTTT cannot handle natively. They migrated to Make at $10.59/month, which provided both the conditional logic and higher execution volume. IFTTT works well for its intended purpose — simple personal and smart home automation — but teams quickly outgrow it when business requirements become more complex.
Related Questions
Related Tools
IFTTT
Every thing works better together
Workflow AutomationZapier
Automate workflows between apps without coding—connect 9,000+ tools with simple, reliable automation.
Workflow AutomationMake
Automate your work with visual workflow builder and AI agents
Workflow AutomationActivepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026
Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9, Kissflow 5.8 and ServiceNow 4.8, scored 22 September 2026 on the five weighted criteria. Those criteria cover the step type, the approver's account or licence, the routes available on a rejection, the audit record, and the meter that charges for the decision, and none of them can tell a review from a rubber stamp, so the methodology adds a check readers can run on any product in a few minutes: whether the decision record tells a considered approval from an instant one. Every figure was read from a vendor-owned surface and carries its own date.
Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026
This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.
Dive Deeper
Moxo vs Lindy in 2026: Who Presses Approve When the Agent Asks
Lindy, founded in 2023, sells an AI teammate that lives in Slack and in each person's inbox; Moxo, whose predecessor Moxtra was co-founded in 2012, runs multi-party processes where approvals are steps only a person can close. Moxo wins three rounds to two: who closes the step, work across companies and the record. Lindy wins reach and testing. Vendor pages and docs read 28 September 2026.
Moxo vs Kissflow in 2026: What an Outside Approver Costs, and What the Record Proves
Moxo and Kissflow both sell approvals to people who do not write code, and each wins one round outright: Moxo's Web and Headless SDKs run the approval inside the buyer's own product, under the buyer's own sign-in. Kissflow's portal audit log stamps every event with an actor, a device and an IP, where Moxo publishes no field list. Both answers are quoted, not priced, and both meters punish a one-step request sent to hundreds of clients. Cost, the decision record, rejection routes, AI metering and governance, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.
Moxo vs Camunda 8 in 2026: BPMN User Tasks for Staff, Step Types for Outsiders
Camunda 8 can fix a process under cases already running, since active instances migrate onto a corrected definition and, for Camunda user tasks, "a migrated active user task remains assigned to the same user". Moxo keeps the shared queue that Camunda's Tasklist V2 stops evaluating, with desks that are "a shared inbox that multiple users can pick work from". Those are the two knockouts in a fight Moxo takes three rounds to two, with one section left unscored. Portability, AI review gates and a published price decide the rest, verified 14 to 23 September 2026.