How do you migrate workflows from Zapier to Make?
Quick Answer: To migrate from Zapier to Make, start by auditing your Zapier Zaps and mapping each to Make's equivalent modules. Recreate workflows in Make using its visual builder, test thoroughly with sample data, then run both platforms in parallel before cutting over. Most migrations take 1-2 weeks for 10-20 Zaps.
How to Migrate from Zapier to Make: Step-by-Step Guide
Migrating from Zapier to Make can save the team significant money and access more advanced automation capabilities. However, the migration requires careful planning since there is no automated migration tool between the two platforms. Here is a proven step-by-step process.
Step 1: Audit Your Existing Zaps
Before building anything in Make, create a complete inventory of your Zapier workflows:
- List every active Zap with its trigger app, action apps, and number of steps
- Note monthly task usage for each Zap to understand your volume requirements on Make
- Identify critical Zaps that cannot have downtime during migration
- Document any Zapier-specific features you use: Paths, Formatter, Looping, Digest, Storage
- Check for Zapier-exclusive apps — verify that every app in your Zaps has a Make module equivalent
Create a spreadsheet with columns for: Zap name, trigger app, action apps, steps, monthly tasks, priority, and Make module availability.
Step 2: Map Zapier Apps to Make Modules
Zapier and Make use different terminology and sometimes different API scopes for the same services:
| Zapier Concept | Make Equivalent |
|---|---|
| Zap | Scenario |
| Task | Operation |
| Trigger | Trigger module |
| Action | Action module |
| Path (branching) | Router module |
| Filter | Filter |
| Formatter | Built-in functions |
| Looping | Iterator + Aggregator |
| Zapier Storage | Data Stores |
| Webhooks by Zapier | Webhooks module |
For each Zap, verify that Make has modules for every connected app. Make supports 1,800+ apps, so most Zapier apps have equivalents. For apps without native Make modules, check if users can use Make's HTTP module with the app's API.
Step 3: Recreate Workflows in Make
Start with your simplest Zaps and work toward complex ones:
- Create the scenario in Make and add the trigger module matching your Zap's trigger
- Authenticate your accounts — users will need to re-authorize every connected service
- Add action modules and map the data fields. Make's visual data mapping is more powerful than Zapier's field mapping, but it takes time to learn the interface.
- Convert Zapier Paths to Make Routers — Make's Router module splits scenarios into multiple branches, each with its own filter conditions
- Replace Formatter steps with Make functions — Make has built-in text, date, math, and array functions that replace Zapier's Formatter
- Handle errors — Add error handler modules to critical scenarios. Make's error handling is more sophisticated than Zapier's, offering retry, ignore, break, and rollback options.
Step 4: Test with Sample Data
Thorough testing is critical before going live:
- Run each scenario manually with the "Run once" button using real sample data
- Verify every output field matches what your downstream systems expect
- Test edge cases: empty fields, special characters, large data sets, and error conditions
- Check data formatting: dates, numbers, and currencies may format differently between platforms
- Validate webhook URLs if external systems send data to the automations (they will have new URLs in Make)
Step 5: Run Both Platforms in Parallel
For critical workflows, run Zapier and Make simultaneously for 1-2 weeks:
- Keep your Zaps active while new Make scenarios run alongside them
- Compare outputs to ensure Make produces identical results
- Monitor Make's execution logs for any errors or unexpected behavior
- For workflows that create records (e.g., new contacts, invoices), use a test environment to avoid duplicates
Step 6: Cut Over and Decommission
Once you are confident in your Make scenarios:
- Update webhook URLs in any external systems that send data to the automations
- Turn off Zaps one at a time, starting with non-critical workflows
- Monitor Make scenarios closely for the first week after each cutover
- Keep your Zapier account active for 30 days after full migration as a safety net
- Cancel your Zapier subscription once everything is verified
Timeline Expectations
| Migration Size | Estimated Time |
|---|---|
| 1-5 simple Zaps | 1-2 days |
| 10-20 mixed Zaps | 1-2 weeks |
| 50+ complex Zaps | 4-8 weeks |
The biggest time investment is learning Make's interface and re-authenticating all your connected accounts. Once you are comfortable with Make, individual workflow recreation typically takes 15-45 minutes per Zap depending on complexity.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationCamunda
Open-source workflow and process automation platform using BPMN.
Workflow AutomationHuginn
Build agents that monitor and act on your behalf
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Automation Tools for Marketing Teams in 2026
A ranked evaluation of automation tools used by marketing teams for campaign operations, data management, lead workflows, and cross-platform coordination. Unlike dedicated marketing automation platforms (email tools), this ranking evaluates general-purpose automation tools through the lens of marketing team utility. As of March 2026, marketing teams increasingly rely on a combination of workflow automation platforms and specialized marketing tools. This ranking covers the broader marketing operations (MarOps) stack -- the tools that marketing teams use day-to-day for operations, not just email campaigns. Tools were scored across five criteria specific to marketing team needs: workflow coverage, marketer accessibility, integration breadth with marketing platforms, cost efficiency, and data handling capabilities.
Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026
Process orchestration platforms coordinate complex, multi-step workflows with dependency management, failure handling, and execution monitoring. Unlike simple automation tools that chain triggers and actions, orchestration platforms handle saga patterns, parallel execution, conditional branching, and durable execution that survives infrastructure failures. This ranking evaluates 7 orchestration platforms as of March 2026, covering both enterprise-grade BPMN engines and developer-focused open-source frameworks. The evaluation spans orchestration depth (workflow complexity support), scalability (concurrent execution capacity), developer experience (SDK quality and debugging tools), monitoring (observability and failure recovery), and community (GitHub activity and commercial support). Scores reflect production deployments managing workflows from 50 to 15,000 daily runs.
Dive Deeper
Automation for Real Estate: Lead Routing, Document Management, and CRM Workflows
Real estate businesses use automation to route leads from listing portals, manage document workflows for transactions, send automated follow-ups, and synchronize property data across platforms. As of 2026, the average mid-size brokerage automates 8 to 15 workflows spanning lead capture, nurture sequences, and transaction coordination. This guide details the automation patterns that deliver measurable ROI in residential and commercial real estate operations.
Automation for SaaS Companies: Operations, Billing, and Growth
SaaS companies rely on automation for trial-to-paid conversion, usage-based billing reconciliation, customer onboarding sequences, and internal operations. As of 2026, the typical mid-market SaaS company automates between 15 and 40 internal workflows using a combination of iPaaS tools and custom integrations. This guide covers the most common automation patterns in SaaS operations, the tools best suited for each, and the implementation considerations that distinguish successful deployments from failed ones.
Automation for Digital Agencies: Client Onboarding, Reporting, and Project Management
Digital and marketing agencies automate client onboarding, project setup, time tracking aggregation, reporting pipelines, and internal communications. As of 2026, agencies with 10 or more employees typically maintain 12 to 25 automated workflows to reduce administrative overhead and ensure consistent service delivery. This guide covers the automation patterns that scale with agency growth, from freelancer-to-team transitions through multi-office operations.