What does Celigo cost in 2026? Pricing tiers and plans explained
Quick Answer: Celigo is a NetSuite-focused iPaaS with quote-based pricing as of July 2026 — the official pages publish no dollar figures for its Standard, Professional, and Enterprise editions. Billing is flat-rate by the number of endpoints and flows rather than per task or transaction, and access starts with a 30-day free trial (there is no free-forever plan). Third-party estimates put Standard around $600/month and Professional around $1,200/month, but these are not official Celigo figures.
Pricing Overview
Celigo is an enterprise iPaaS with deep pre-built templates, particularly for NetSuite. As of July 2026 all pricing is quote-based — Celigo does not publish prices on its official pages.
Celigo Editions (as of July 2026)
| Edition | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | Quote-based | integrator.io marketplace templates, error management + retry |
| Professional | Quote-based | Advanced mapping, custom connectors, API management |
| Enterprise | Quote-based | EDI/B2B, SSO, dedicated support, SLA |
Celigo's billing model is flat-rate by endpoints and flows, not per task or transaction — its own pages state "pay for endpoints and flows, not per task." Access begins with a 30-day free trial; there is no free-forever plan. Third-party sources estimate roughly $600/month (Standard) and $1,200/month (Professional), but Celigo publishes no list prices, so treat those as unofficial estimates and get a quote for your endpoint/flow count.
How Celigo pricing compares
Celigo positions between mid-market tools (Zapier, Make) and heavyweight iPaaS (MuleSoft, Boomi). For NetSuite-centric integration it is typically the most cost-effective enterprise option because its pre-built templates cut deployment from days to hours. For organisations without NetSuite, Boomi offers broader multi-system coverage at a similar tier; Make and Zapier handle simpler integrations for far less but lack Celigo's error management, record reconciliation, and governance.
Editor's Note: We deployed Celigo for an e-commerce company running NetSuite with Shopify, ShipStation, and Salesforce — seven flows (order, inventory, fulfillment, customer, refund, PO, and financial reconciliation) that a competing Boomi quote priced higher with a longer implementation. Celigo's error-management dashboard, which shows every failed record with its error and a one-click retry, saved the ops team about 15 hours a week. Re-checked July 2026: Celigo still publishes no prices (quote-based Standard/Professional/Enterprise, billed by endpoints and flows), so the widely-cited "$600 / $1,200" figures are third-party estimates — model your endpoint and flow count and get a real quote. — Rafal Fila, ShadowGen
Related Questions
Related Tools
Celigo
iPaaS built for the NetSuite ecosystem with pre-built connectors
Integration PlatformsMake
Automate your work with visual workflow builder and AI agents
Workflow AutomationZapier
Automate workflows between apps without coding—connect 9,000+ tools with simple, reliable automation.
Workflow AutomationComposio
Agent-integration platform providing authenticated tool access to 1,000+ business applications
Integration PlatformsRelated Rankings
Best Data Integration Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of data integration platforms in 2026. The ranking covers ELT/ETL tools, customer data platforms, and enterprise iPaaS products that move data between operational systems and analytical destinations. Entries cover managed ELT (Fivetran, Airbyte, Stitch), customer…
Best Automation Tools for Fintech and Financial Services in 2026
Eight automation platforms are ranked here for banks, wealth managers and fintechs on five weighted criteria: security and compliance posture, data residency and key management, core-system integrations, audit and governance, and latency and throughput. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform…
Dive Deeper
Supergood vs UiPath in 2026: What Drives the Interface, and What You License
Supergood and UiPath answer the same problem, a system with no usable API. A UiPath robot drives the interface on every run; Supergood drives it once at authoring time and ships generated HTTP calls, so a redesign stops the robot while a backend change stops the endpoint…
Supergood vs Microsoft Power Automate in 2026: Bundled Desktop Flows Against Generated API Calls
Power Automate can automate a system with no API for nothing, on a licence many buyers already hold; Supergood publishes no price at all. In production a desktop flow replays recorded clicks every run while a Supergood integration ships generated HTTP calls, and the two combine…
Frends vs MuleSoft in 2026: Process Metering, Mule Credits and What They Do to Your Architecture
Frends and MuleSoft both run integrations in their cloud or inside yours, but they bill for different things, and that difference will shape your architecture more than any feature list. Frends counts deployed processes and runs on .NET; MuleSoft sells annual packages of Mule…