Can you use Make for web scraping?
Quick Answer: Yes, within limits. Make supports web scraping through HTTP modules (for simple page fetching and parsing), text parser modules, and integrations with dedicated scraping services like Apify, ScrapingBee, and Browserless. Make is suited for small-scale scraping; large-scale operations benefit from a dedicated scraping platform.
Using Make for Web Scraping
Make offers several paths for web scraping, from direct HTTP requests to integrations with specialized scraping services. The right approach depends on scale, target site complexity, and whether JavaScript rendering is required.
Method 1: HTTP Module
Make's HTTP module sends GET requests and retrieves raw HTML. Best for simple static pages.
- GET request to target URL
- Parse response with Text Parser module (regex)
- Extract fields into variables
- Limit: does not execute JavaScript; only works on server-rendered content
Method 2: Text Parser Module
Text Parser supports regex and "Match pattern" operations to extract data from HTML or text responses.
- Parse HTML with regex capture groups
- Handle multiple matches with iterator
- Limit: breaks easily when page structure changes
Method 3: Apify Integration
Apify is a scraping platform with actors (pre-built scrapers) for common sites. Make's Apify module runs actors and receives results.
- Pre-built actors for Google Maps, LinkedIn, e-commerce sites
- JavaScript rendering support
- Pay-per-compute pricing on Apify
Method 4: ScrapingBee Integration
ScrapingBee offers a scraping API that handles headless browsers, proxies, and CAPTCHA.
- HTTP requests with JavaScript rendering
- Proxy rotation and geo-targeting
- Pricing: starts at $49/month for 100,000 API calls
Method 5: Browserless Integration
Browserless provides a hosted headless Chrome API. Custom scripts run in a browser and return data.
- Full JavaScript rendering
- Custom Puppeteer or Playwright scripts
- Usage-based pricing
When Make Fits Scraping
- Small volume (under 1,000 pages/day)
- Simple, static target sites
- Teams already using Make for other workflows
- Scraping as part of a larger workflow (enrichment, monitoring)
When a Dedicated Scraper Is Better
- Large-scale (100K+ pages/day)
- Sites requiring browser automation and complex interaction
- Anti-bot bypass and CAPTCHA solving at scale
- Teams needing structured data pipelines
Legal and Ethical Notes
Scraping should respect robots.txt, site terms of service, and applicable laws. Some jurisdictions (EU, US) have court rulings on scraping public data; others are more restrictive. Always check target site terms before scraping.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Open-Source Workflow Engines for Engineers in 2026
A ranked list of the best open-source workflow engines for engineers in 2026. This ranking evaluates code-first workflow orchestration platforms that engineers can self-host, extend, and embed inside existing software stacks. The ranking differs from the broader Best Open-Source Automation 2026 list by focusing specifically on workflow engines intended for developers: platforms that prioritize SDK coverage, durable execution, scalability, and operational controls over visual SaaS-connector automation. It includes durable execution engines (Temporal), data and task orchestrators (Apache Airflow, Prefect), low-code workflow builders with strong self-host stories (n8n, Windmill, Activepieces), and historical agent-based tools (Huginn).
Best Automation Tools for Healthcare in 2026
A ranked list of the best automation tools for healthcare organisations in 2026. This ranking evaluates platforms across HIPAA readiness, audit logging, PHI handling, on-premise or private-cloud deployment options, and integration with clinical and administrative systems. The ranking includes enterprise RPA (UiPath, Automation Anywhere), Microsoft-native automation (Power Automate), general-purpose workflow automation (Zapier on Business tier, Make, n8n self-hosted), and enterprise iPaaS (Boomi). Each entry is evaluated against the specific compliance, data-residency, and clinical-integration requirements that distinguish healthcare from other industries.
Dive Deeper
Temporal vs Apache Airflow 2026: Durable Workflows vs DAG Orchestration
Temporal and Apache Airflow are open-source workflow engines that solve different problems. Temporal is a durable execution platform for long-running backend workflows written in application code, while Apache Airflow is a Python-based DAG scheduler for batch data pipelines. This 2026 comparison covers execution models, pricing, and when each engine is the correct choice.
Temporal vs n8n 2026: Code-First Workflows vs Visual Automation
Temporal and n8n are workflow tools with different audiences. Temporal is a durable execution SDK for backend engineers building fault-tolerant distributed systems in Go, Java, TypeScript, Python, and .NET. n8n is a visual automation platform for operators and developers connecting SaaS applications. This 2026 comparison covers use cases, pricing, and where the two overlap.
Camunda vs Zeebe 2026: Camunda 7 Platform vs Camunda 8 Cloud-Native Engine
Zeebe is the cloud-native BPMN workflow engine that powers Camunda 8, while Camunda 7 is the mature JVM-based platform that preceded it. Both are maintained by Camunda Services GmbH. This 2026 comparison clarifies the architecture differences, feature deltas, migration considerations, and pricing between the two generations.