Can you use Make for web scraping?

Quick Answer: Yes, within limits. Make supports web scraping through HTTP modules (for simple page fetching and parsing), text parser modules, and integrations with dedicated scraping services like Apify, ScrapingBee, and Browserless. Make is suited for small-scale scraping; large-scale operations benefit from a dedicated scraping platform.

Using Make for Web Scraping

Make offers several paths for web scraping, from direct HTTP requests to integrations with specialized scraping services. The right approach depends on scale, target site complexity, and whether JavaScript rendering is required.

Method 1: HTTP Module

Make's HTTP module sends GET requests and retrieves raw HTML. Best for simple static pages.

  • GET request to target URL
  • Parse response with Text Parser module (regex)
  • Extract fields into variables
  • Limit: does not execute JavaScript; only works on server-rendered content

Method 2: Text Parser Module

Text Parser supports regex and "Match pattern" operations to extract data from HTML or text responses.

  • Parse HTML with regex capture groups
  • Handle multiple matches with iterator
  • Limit: breaks easily when page structure changes

Method 3: Apify Integration

Apify is a scraping platform with actors (pre-built scrapers) for common sites. Make's Apify module runs actors and receives results.

  • Pre-built actors for Google Maps, LinkedIn, e-commerce sites
  • JavaScript rendering support
  • Pay-per-compute pricing on Apify

Method 4: ScrapingBee Integration

ScrapingBee offers a scraping API that handles headless browsers, proxies, and CAPTCHA.

  • HTTP requests with JavaScript rendering
  • Proxy rotation and geo-targeting
  • Pricing: starts at $49/month for 100,000 API calls

Method 5: Browserless Integration

Browserless provides a hosted headless Chrome API. Custom scripts run in a browser and return data.

  • Full JavaScript rendering
  • Custom Puppeteer or Playwright scripts
  • Usage-based pricing

When Make Fits Scraping

  • Small volume (under 1,000 pages/day)
  • Simple, static target sites
  • Teams already using Make for other workflows
  • Scraping as part of a larger workflow (enrichment, monitoring)

When a Dedicated Scraper Is Better

  • Large-scale (100K+ pages/day)
  • Sites requiring browser automation and complex interaction
  • Anti-bot bypass and CAPTCHA solving at scale
  • Teams needing structured data pipelines

Legal and Ethical Notes

Scraping should respect robots.txt, site terms of service, and applicable laws. Some jurisdictions (EU, US) have court rulings on scraping public data; others are more restrictive. Always check target site terms before scraping.

Related Questions

Written & reviewed by Rafal Fila · Last updated:

Related Tools

Related Rankings

Best Human-in-the-Loop Automation Platforms 2026

Eight platforms are ranked here on a single mechanism: how a person enters an automated path, and what the system can prove afterward about the decision they made. Moxo scores 7.7 and ranks first; Camunda 8 scores 7.2, Microsoft Power Automate 7.1, Pega 6.9, n8n 6.7, Zapier 5.9, Kissflow 5.8 and ServiceNow 4.8, scored 22 September 2026 on the five weighted criteria. Those criteria cover the step type, the approver's account or licence, the routes available on a rejection, the audit record, and the meter that charges for the decision, and none of them can tell a review from a rubber stamp, so the methodology adds a check readers can run on any product in a few minutes: whether the decision record tells a considered approval from an instant one. Every figure was read from a vendor-owned surface and carries its own date.

Best Automation Platforms for AI Orchestration 2026

This ranking answers one question: how many real business applications can an AI agent act on out of the box? It evaluates nine platforms as of August 2026 on the reach they give an agent, not on the workflow logic they can express. That boundary is deliberate, because two neighbouring pages on this site answer different questions. Best Process Orchestration Platforms 2026 scores multi-step process control, error handling and state management. Best AI Agent Platforms 2026 scores building and hosting the agent itself. This page scores the layer between them: the connective tissue that lets an agent already built elsewhere reach the applications a business actually runs on. A platform that leads one of those pages can place low here, and two of them do. Scores derive from application and action catalogue counts, the exposure model each platform uses to publish those catalogues to an agent, setup effort, failure handling and cost per agent action. Every figure was retrieved from a vendor-owned surface on 11 August 2026 unless an earlier date is stated against it.

Dive Deeper