How much does Apify cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: Apify offers a free tier with $5 of included usage. Paid plans start at $49/month (Starter) and $499/month (Scale), both based on compute usage credits. Enterprise pricing with dedicated infrastructure is custom as of March 2026.
Pricing Overview
Apify is a web scraping and data extraction platform that uses a usage-based pricing model. Costs are measured in "compute units" that reflect the CPU, memory, and run time consumed by scraping actors (Apify's term for automation scripts). The platform also offers pre-built actors from its marketplace that can be run without writing code.
Apify Pricing Tiers (as of March 2026)
| Tier | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 ($5 platform usage included) | 30-day data retention, community actors, shared proxy |
| Starter | $49/mo | $49 platform usage, 14-day data retention, basic proxy, email support |
| Scale | $499/mo | $499 platform usage, 90-day data retention, premium proxy, priority support |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing | Dedicated infrastructure, custom SLA, dedicated account manager, on-premise option |
What Each Plan Includes
Free
The free plan includes $5 worth of platform usage per month, which is enough to run small-scale scraping tasks — typically 1,000-5,000 web pages depending on the actor's compute requirements. Data is retained for 30 days, and users have access to community-built actors in the Apify Store. The shared proxy pool is included but may be blocked by some target websites.
Starter
The Starter plan at $49/month provides $49 worth of platform compute. Data retention drops to 14 days (shorter than the free tier). It adds basic datacenter proxy access and email support. This tier is suitable for businesses running regular scraping jobs on 10,000-50,000 pages per month.
Scale
The Scale plan at $499/month provides $499 in compute credits and extends data retention to 90 days. It includes premium residential proxies (critical for scraping sites with aggressive anti-bot measures), priority support, and higher concurrency limits. This tier targets businesses that depend on web data for competitive intelligence, pricing monitoring, or lead generation.
Enterprise
Enterprise pricing includes dedicated infrastructure, custom SLAs, a dedicated account manager, and the option for on-premise deployment. Enterprise contracts are suitable for organizations scraping millions of pages monthly or processing sensitive data that requires private infrastructure.
Hidden Costs and Considerations
- Proxy costs are separate: Residential proxy traffic is billed separately from compute usage. Residential proxies cost approximately $8 per GB of data transferred. A large scraping operation that transfers 100 GB of data through residential proxies would incur $800 in proxy costs alone.
- Actor compute varies widely: Different actors consume compute at different rates. A simple HTML scraper might cost $0.25 per 1,000 pages, while a headless browser scraper (using Puppeteer or Playwright) might cost $2-5 per 1,000 pages due to higher CPU and memory usage.
- Data retention trade-off: The Starter plan's 14-day data retention is shorter than the free plan's 30 days. Users who need longer retention must download or export data regularly.
How Apify Pricing Compares
Apify competes with both web scraping platforms and data extraction APIs. Bright Data's SERP API starts at $500/month for 100,000 requests. ScrapingBee starts at $49/month for 1,000 API credits. Octoparse starts at $89/month for cloud-based scraping. Apify's advantage is its actor marketplace and the ability to run custom code, which provides more flexibility than API-only scraping services. For developers comfortable writing or customizing code, Apify typically offers better value per page scraped.
Editor's Note: We ran Apify for a price monitoring project scraping 50,000 product pages daily from 12 e-commerce sites. Monthly cost: $499 Scale plan + approximately $320 in residential proxy usage = $819/month. The residential proxies were necessary because 4 of the 12 target sites blocked datacenter IPs. Without residential proxies, the Scale plan alone would have sufficed at $499/month. Processing 1.5 million pages per month at $819 works out to approximately $0.55 per 1,000 pages — significantly less than API-based services that charge $2-5 per 1,000 requests.
Related Questions
- What are the best workflow automation tools for technical writers in 2026?
- What are the best AI-native automation tools in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for finance and AP teams in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for solo founders in 2026?
- What are the best automation tools for nonprofits in 2026?
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCalendly
Scheduling automation platform for booking meetings without email back-and-forth, with CRM integrations and routing forms for lead qualification.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best Durable Workflow Engines for Production in 2026
A ranked list of the best durable workflow engines for production deployments in 2026. Durable workflow engines persist execution state to a database so that long-running workflows survive process restarts, deployments, and infrastructure failures. The ranking covers Temporal, Prefect, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Windmill, and n8n. Tools were evaluated on production reliability, developer experience, scalability, open-source health, and documentation quality. The shortlist intentionally mixes code-first engines (Temporal, Prefect, Airflow) with hybrid visual platforms (Camunda, Windmill, n8n) to reflect how production teams actually choose workflow engines in 2026.
Best No-Code Automation Platforms in 2026
A ranked list of no-code automation platforms in 2026. The ranking covers visual workflow builders that allow non-engineering teams to connect SaaS apps, route data, and add conditional logic without writing code. Entries cover proprietary cloud platforms (Zapier, Make, Pipedream, IFTTT) and open-source visual builders (n8n, Activepieces). Scoring reflects integration breadth, pricing accessibility, visual editor ease, reliability and error handling, and self-hosting availability.
Dive Deeper
Migrating 23 Make Scenarios to Self-Hosted n8n: a 3-Week Breakdown
Anonymized retrospective of a DTC ecommerce brand migrating 23 Make scenarios to a self-hosted n8n instance over three weeks. Tooling cost dropped from $348/month on Make Teams to roughly $12/month on a Hetzner VPS, but credential and webhook recreation consumed about 40% of total project time.
Trigger.dev vs Inngest 2026: OSS Durable Runners Compared
Trigger.dev (2022, London) is a fully Apache 2.0 durable runner with task-based authoring, machine-size selection, and first-class self-host. Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first event-driven step platform with an open-source dev server and a managed cloud (50K step runs/month free, $20/month Hobby). This 2026 comparison covers license, programming model, pricing, observability, and self-host options.
Inngest vs Temporal 2026: Durable Functions vs Durable Workflows
Inngest (2021, San Francisco) is a developer-first durable functions platform with TypeScript and Python SDKs, 50,000 step runs/month free, and Hobby pricing from $20/month. Temporal (2019) is the heavyweight durable workflow engine with seven-language SDK coverage, Cassandra-backed scale, and Cloud pricing from roughly $200/month at low volume or $2.5-4.5K/month self-host. This 2026 comparison covers programming model, pricing, scale ceiling, and operational footprint.