How much does Tines cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: Tines offers a free Community Edition with unlimited workflows for single users. Enterprise pricing is custom and typically starts at $50,000 or more per year, based on team size and deployment requirements as of March 2026.
Pricing Overview
Tines is a security automation and orchestration platform that uses an enterprise sales model for its paid tier. Unlike consumer-focused automation tools, Tines targets security operations centers (SOCs) and IT teams. The platform offers a free Community Edition and custom Enterprise pricing.
Tines Pricing Tiers (as of March 2026)
| Tier | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Community | $0 | Unlimited stories (workflows), all core actions, community library, single-user |
| Enterprise | Custom (typically $50,000+/year) | Multi-user, SSO/SAML, audit logs, tenant management, dedicated support, SLA |
What Each Plan Includes
Community
The Tines Community Edition is a genuinely usable free tier, not a time-limited trial. It provides access to all core actions (HTTP requests, triggers, event transforms, data storage) and the ability to build unlimited stories (Tines' term for workflows). The main limitations are single-user access and the absence of team collaboration, SSO, and audit features. The community library offers hundreds of pre-built stories for common security automation use cases including phishing triage, alert enrichment, and vulnerability management.
Enterprise
Enterprise pricing is negotiated directly with the Tines sales team. Based on reported customer data and industry analyst estimates, annual contracts typically start at $50,000 for small security teams and scale to $200,000+ for large SOCs with 20+ analysts. Enterprise includes multi-user workspaces, SSO/SAML integration, audit logging, tenant management for MSSPs, role-based access control, and dedicated customer support with SLA guarantees.
Hidden Costs and Considerations
- No mid-tier option: Tines offers no paid tier between free (single-user) and Enterprise ($50,000+/year). Teams of 2-5 security analysts who need collaboration features face a significant cost jump with no intermediate option.
- Integration effort: While Tines connects to any API via HTTP actions, there are no pre-built "connectors" in the traditional iPaaS sense. Security teams should budget developer time for building and maintaining custom API integrations with their security stack.
- Training and onboarding: Tines has a steeper learning curve than consumer automation platforms. Budget 2-4 weeks for a security analyst to become proficient with story building.
How Tines Pricing Compares
Tines competes with other SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) platforms. Palo Alto XSOAR starts at approximately $75,000/year for a 100-incident/day license. Splunk SOAR pricing is usage-based and typically ranges from $30,000 to $100,000+/year. For general-purpose automation, Zapier and Make are 10-50x less expensive, but they lack the security-specific actions, case management, and SOC-focused features that Tines provides. The Community Edition is the most generous free tier among SOAR platforms.
Editor's Note: We evaluated Tines for a 12-person security team at a financial services firm. The Community Edition was productive within a week for a single analyst building phishing triage automations. When the team needed multi-user access, the Enterprise quote came in at $85,000/year for 12 seats. The alternative — Palo Alto XSOAR — was quoted at $120,000/year. Tines was chosen, and the team automated 65% of their Tier 1 alert triage within 3 months, reducing mean time to respond from 45 minutes to 8 minutes. The hidden cost was 3 months of a senior analyst's time ($35,000 equivalent) building the initial automation library.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCamunda
Open-source workflow and process automation platform using BPMN.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best AI-Powered Automation Tools in 2026
AI-powered automation tools integrate artificial intelligence features — natural language workflow creation, intelligent data mapping, predictive actions, and LLM-based content generation — into their automation platforms. As of March 2026, most major automation platforms have added AI capabilities, but the depth and practical utility of these features varies significantly. This ranking evaluates 8 automation tools on the practical value of their AI features, not marketing claims. The evaluation focuses on whether AI features reduce manual configuration, accelerate workflow creation, and improve outcomes versus doing the same work without AI. Tools that use AI as a core differentiator (not just a checkbox feature) score higher.
Best Automation Tools for Startups in 2026
Startups need automation tools that provide immediate value at minimal cost, with room to scale as the team grows. The best startup automation tools offer generous free tiers, fast time-to-value (first working automation within hours, not days), and a clear scaling path from 5-person team to 50-person company. This ranking evaluates 8 automation platforms specifically for startup relevance as of March 2026. The evaluation prioritizes free tier generosity, speed from signup to first working automation, scalability as the team and workflow count grow, integration breadth covering the typical startup tech stack (Slack, Google Workspace, HubSpot, Stripe, GitHub, Notion), and total cost at early-stage volumes (under 50,000 tasks per month).
Dive Deeper
Make vs Power Automate in 2026: Visual Flexibility vs Microsoft Ecosystem
A detailed comparison of Make and Power Automate covering visual builders, integration ecosystems, pricing models, AI features, enterprise compliance, and real deployment data from parallel testing.
Zapier vs IFTTT in 2026: Professional Automation vs Consumer Simplicity
A detailed comparison of Zapier and IFTTT covering target audiences, integration ecosystems, workflow complexity, pricing, smart home capabilities, and AI features with real deployment data.
n8n vs Windmill in 2026: Visual Open-Source vs Code-First Automation
A detailed comparison of n8n and Windmill covering architecture, integration approaches, pricing, developer experience, execution performance, and real deployment data from parallel testing.