How does Make's pricing compare to Zapier in 2026?
Quick Answer: Make is significantly cheaper than Zapier at every tier. Make's free plan includes 1,000 operations/month versus Zapier's 100 tasks. At the paid entry level, Make charges $9/month for 10,000 operations while Zapier charges $19.99/month for just 750 tasks. For teams running 50,000+ automations monthly, Make can be 3-5x cheaper.
Make vs Zapier Pricing: A Complete Cost Comparison
Make (formerly Integromat) and Zapier are the two most popular hosted automation platforms, but their pricing models work very differently. Understanding these differences can save the team hundreds or thousands of dollars per year.
Understanding the Pricing Models
Zapier charges per task. A task is consumed every time an action step runs in your Zap. Trigger and filter steps are free, but each action step in a multi-step Zap counts individually. A 5-step Zap running once consumes 4 tasks.
Make charges per operation. An operation is consumed when a module processes a bundle of data. The key difference: Make's operations tend to cover more ground per unit because Make's modules are more granular and each data bundle processed counts as one operation.
Side-by-Side Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Make | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | 1,000 ops/month, 2 scenarios | 100 tasks/month, 5 single-step Zaps |
| Entry Paid | $9/month — 10,000 ops | $19.99/month — 750 tasks |
| Mid Tier | $16/month — 10,000 ops + more features | $49/month — 2,000 tasks |
| Team Tier | $29/month — 10,000 ops + teams | $69/month — 2,000 tasks + teams |
| High Volume | $99/month — 40,000 ops | $299/month — 50,000 tasks |
| Multi-Step Workflows | Included on all plans | Paid plans only |
| Minimum Polling Interval | 1 minute (paid) | 1 minute (paid) |
Cost at Different Scales
Here is what each platform costs at various usage levels:
| Monthly Usage | Make Cost | Zapier Cost | Savings with Make |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 actions | Free | $19.99 (Starter) | $19.99/month |
| 5,000 actions | $9/month | $49/month | $40/month |
| 10,000 actions | $9/month | $99/month | $90/month |
| 25,000 actions | $29/month | $159/month | $130/month |
| 50,000 actions | $99/month | $299/month | $200/month |
| 100,000 actions | $159/month | $599/month | $440/month |
Note: Exact costs vary based on plan features and annual vs monthly billing. Task/operation counts are approximate equivalents.
Operations vs Tasks: Why Make Is Cheaper
The pricing gap comes from fundamental model differences. In Zapier, a 5-step Zap that processes 100 records uses 400 tasks (4 action steps times 100). In Make, the same workflow might use 500 operations, but Make's per-operation cost is dramatically lower. At the entry paid tier, Zapier costs $0.027 per task while Make costs $0.0009 per operation.
Make also includes multi-step scenarios on its free plan, while Zapier restricts free users to single-step Zaps. This alone makes Make the clear winner for anyone needing even basic multi-step automations.
When Zapier Is Still the Better Value
- App coverage matters most: Zapier supports 7,000+ apps vs Make's 1,800+. If a critical app is only on Zapier, the premium may be worth it.
- Ease of use is paramount: Zapier's linear builder is faster for simple trigger-action workflows.
- Enterprise requirements: Zapier's enterprise plan offers SAML SSO, advanced admin controls, and dedicated account management that some organizations require.
When Make Wins on Price
- Any volume above 1,000 operations/month — Make's free tier alone beats Zapier's Starter plan
- Multi-step workflows — included free on Make, paid-only on Zapier
- Data-heavy automations — Make's visual router and data transformation tools mean fewer modules needed
- Teams scaling up — the cost gap widens dramatically at higher volumes, saving $200-$400/month at 50,000+ operations
Related Questions
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCamunda
Open-source workflow and process automation platform using BPMN.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best AI-Powered Automation Tools in 2026
AI-powered automation tools integrate artificial intelligence features — natural language workflow creation, intelligent data mapping, predictive actions, and LLM-based content generation — into their automation platforms. As of March 2026, most major automation platforms have added AI capabilities, but the depth and practical utility of these features varies significantly. This ranking evaluates 8 automation tools on the practical value of their AI features, not marketing claims. The evaluation focuses on whether AI features reduce manual configuration, accelerate workflow creation, and improve outcomes versus doing the same work without AI. Tools that use AI as a core differentiator (not just a checkbox feature) score higher.
Best Automation Tools for Startups in 2026
Startups need automation tools that provide immediate value at minimal cost, with room to scale as the team grows. The best startup automation tools offer generous free tiers, fast time-to-value (first working automation within hours, not days), and a clear scaling path from 5-person team to 50-person company. This ranking evaluates 8 automation platforms specifically for startup relevance as of March 2026. The evaluation prioritizes free tier generosity, speed from signup to first working automation, scalability as the team and workflow count grow, integration breadth covering the typical startup tech stack (Slack, Google Workspace, HubSpot, Stripe, GitHub, Notion), and total cost at early-stage volumes (under 50,000 tasks per month).
Dive Deeper
Make vs Power Automate in 2026: Visual Flexibility vs Microsoft Ecosystem
A detailed comparison of Make and Power Automate covering visual builders, integration ecosystems, pricing models, AI features, enterprise compliance, and real deployment data from parallel testing.
Zapier vs IFTTT in 2026: Professional Automation vs Consumer Simplicity
A detailed comparison of Zapier and IFTTT covering target audiences, integration ecosystems, workflow complexity, pricing, smart home capabilities, and AI features with real deployment data.
n8n vs Windmill in 2026: Visual Open-Source vs Code-First Automation
A detailed comparison of n8n and Windmill covering architecture, integration approaches, pricing, developer experience, execution performance, and real deployment data from parallel testing.