How much does Make cost in 2026?
Quick Answer: Make offers a free tier with 1,000 operations/month and 2 active scenarios. Paid plans start at $9/month (Core) for 10,000 operations, with Pro at $16/month, Teams at $29/month, and custom Enterprise pricing available.
Make Pricing Tiers (as of Q1 2026)
Make (formerly Integromat) uses an operations-based pricing model across five tiers. All paid plans are billed monthly or annually, with annual billing providing a discount of roughly 15-20%.
| Plan | Monthly Price | Operations/Month | Active Scenarios | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1,000 | 2 | Basic integrations, 5-minute scheduling interval |
| Core | $9 | 10,000 | Unlimited | 1-minute scheduling, basic operations log |
| Pro | $16 | 10,000 | Unlimited | Custom variables, full-text execution log, priority execution |
| Teams | $29 | 10,000 | Unlimited | Team roles, shared scenarios, high-priority execution |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Unlimited | SSO/SAML, dedicated support, SLA, custom limits |
Additional operations can be purchased on all paid plans. The Core, Pro, and Teams tiers all start at 10,000 operations but differ in feature access, execution priority, and team collaboration capabilities.
How Make's Operations Model Works
Make counts each module execution within a scenario as one operation. A scenario with five modules that runs once consumes five operations. This differs from Zapier's task model, where each action step in a Zap counts as one task.
The practical difference: a Make scenario with a trigger plus four action modules uses 5 operations per run. An equivalent Zapier Zap uses 4 tasks per run (triggers are free in Zapier). However, Make's base allocation of 10,000 operations at $9/month is substantially more generous than Zapier's 750 tasks at $19.99/month.
Cost Comparison with Competitors
| Platform | Entry Price | Included Volume | Cost per Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Make Core | $9/mo | 10,000 operations | $0.0009/op |
| Zapier Starter | $19.99/mo | 750 tasks | $0.027/task |
| n8n Cloud Starter | $20/mo | 2,500 executions | $0.008/exec |
| n8n Self-Hosted | Free | Unlimited | $0 (server costs only) |
At equivalent volumes, Make consistently costs less than Zapier. For teams processing 10,000+ actions per month, Make's per-operation cost is roughly 30x lower than Zapier's per-task cost on entry-tier plans. n8n self-hosted eliminates per-execution costs entirely but requires infrastructure management.
Free Tier Limitations
Make's free tier includes 1,000 operations per month and a maximum of 2 active scenarios. The scheduling interval is limited to 5 minutes (versus 1 minute on paid plans). Data transfer is capped at 100 MB, and execution history is retained for 7 days. These constraints make the free tier suitable for testing and personal projects but insufficient for production business workflows.
Editor's Note: We tracked costs for a mid-market SaaS client running 23 scenarios processing ~2,300 operations/day. At that volume, Make Teams was $348/mo. The operations model meant multi-step scenarios cost less than equivalent Zapier Zaps since Make counts module executions, not entire workflow runs. One caveat: the free tier's 1,000 operations per month lasted this client less than half a day in testing, so expect to move to a paid plan immediately for any real workload.
When to Upgrade
The Core plan at $9/month covers most small business needs. Pro ($16/month) is worth the upgrade for teams that need detailed execution logs for debugging. Teams ($29/month) becomes necessary when multiple users collaborate on shared scenarios with role-based permissions. Enterprise pricing requires contacting Make's sales team and typically applies to organizations needing SSO, SLA guarantees, or custom operation volumes above 100,000/month.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCamunda
Open-source workflow and process automation platform using BPMN.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best AI-Powered Automation Tools in 2026
AI-powered automation tools integrate artificial intelligence features — natural language workflow creation, intelligent data mapping, predictive actions, and LLM-based content generation — into their automation platforms. As of March 2026, most major automation platforms have added AI capabilities, but the depth and practical utility of these features varies significantly. This ranking evaluates 8 automation tools on the practical value of their AI features, not marketing claims. The evaluation focuses on whether AI features reduce manual configuration, accelerate workflow creation, and improve outcomes versus doing the same work without AI. Tools that use AI as a core differentiator (not just a checkbox feature) score higher.
Best Automation Tools for Startups in 2026
Startups need automation tools that provide immediate value at minimal cost, with room to scale as the team grows. The best startup automation tools offer generous free tiers, fast time-to-value (first working automation within hours, not days), and a clear scaling path from 5-person team to 50-person company. This ranking evaluates 8 automation platforms specifically for startup relevance as of March 2026. The evaluation prioritizes free tier generosity, speed from signup to first working automation, scalability as the team and workflow count grow, integration breadth covering the typical startup tech stack (Slack, Google Workspace, HubSpot, Stripe, GitHub, Notion), and total cost at early-stage volumes (under 50,000 tasks per month).
Dive Deeper
Make vs Power Automate in 2026: Visual Flexibility vs Microsoft Ecosystem
A detailed comparison of Make and Power Automate covering visual builders, integration ecosystems, pricing models, AI features, enterprise compliance, and real deployment data from parallel testing.
Zapier vs IFTTT in 2026: Professional Automation vs Consumer Simplicity
A detailed comparison of Zapier and IFTTT covering target audiences, integration ecosystems, workflow complexity, pricing, smart home capabilities, and AI features with real deployment data.
n8n vs Windmill in 2026: Visual Open-Source vs Code-First Automation
A detailed comparison of n8n and Windmill covering architecture, integration approaches, pricing, developer experience, execution performance, and real deployment data from parallel testing.