How do you migrate workflows from Zapier to Make?
Quick Answer: To migrate from Zapier to Make, start by auditing your Zapier Zaps and mapping each to Make's equivalent modules. Recreate workflows in Make using its visual builder, test thoroughly with sample data, then run both platforms in parallel before cutting over. Most migrations take 1-2 weeks for 10-20 Zaps.
How to Migrate from Zapier to Make: Step-by-Step Guide
Migrating from Zapier to Make can save the team significant money and access more advanced automation capabilities. However, the migration requires careful planning since there is no automated migration tool between the two platforms. Here is a proven step-by-step process.
Step 1: Audit Your Existing Zaps
Before building anything in Make, create a complete inventory of your Zapier workflows:
- List every active Zap with its trigger app, action apps, and number of steps
- Note monthly task usage for each Zap to understand your volume requirements on Make
- Identify critical Zaps that cannot have downtime during migration
- Document any Zapier-specific features you use: Paths, Formatter, Looping, Digest, Storage
- Check for Zapier-exclusive apps — verify that every app in your Zaps has a Make module equivalent
Create a spreadsheet with columns for: Zap name, trigger app, action apps, steps, monthly tasks, priority, and Make module availability.
Step 2: Map Zapier Apps to Make Modules
Zapier and Make use different terminology and sometimes different API scopes for the same services:
| Zapier Concept | Make Equivalent |
|---|---|
| Zap | Scenario |
| Task | Operation |
| Trigger | Trigger module |
| Action | Action module |
| Path (branching) | Router module |
| Filter | Filter |
| Formatter | Built-in functions |
| Looping | Iterator + Aggregator |
| Zapier Storage | Data Stores |
| Webhooks by Zapier | Webhooks module |
For each Zap, verify that Make has modules for every connected app. Make supports 1,800+ apps, so most Zapier apps have equivalents. For apps without native Make modules, check if users can use Make's HTTP module with the app's API.
Step 3: Recreate Workflows in Make
Start with your simplest Zaps and work toward complex ones:
- Create the scenario in Make and add the trigger module matching your Zap's trigger
- Authenticate your accounts — users will need to re-authorize every connected service
- Add action modules and map the data fields. Make's visual data mapping is more powerful than Zapier's field mapping, but it takes time to learn the interface.
- Convert Zapier Paths to Make Routers — Make's Router module splits scenarios into multiple branches, each with its own filter conditions
- Replace Formatter steps with Make functions — Make has built-in text, date, math, and array functions that replace Zapier's Formatter
- Handle errors — Add error handler modules to critical scenarios. Make's error handling is more sophisticated than Zapier's, offering retry, ignore, break, and rollback options.
Step 4: Test with Sample Data
Thorough testing is critical before going live:
- Run each scenario manually with the "Run once" button using real sample data
- Verify every output field matches what your downstream systems expect
- Test edge cases: empty fields, special characters, large data sets, and error conditions
- Check data formatting: dates, numbers, and currencies may format differently between platforms
- Validate webhook URLs if external systems send data to the automations (they will have new URLs in Make)
Step 5: Run Both Platforms in Parallel
For critical workflows, run Zapier and Make simultaneously for 1-2 weeks:
- Keep your Zaps active while new Make scenarios run alongside them
- Compare outputs to ensure Make produces identical results
- Monitor Make's execution logs for any errors or unexpected behavior
- For workflows that create records (e.g., new contacts, invoices), use a test environment to avoid duplicates
Step 6: Cut Over and Decommission
Once you are confident in your Make scenarios:
- Update webhook URLs in any external systems that send data to the automations
- Turn off Zaps one at a time, starting with non-critical workflows
- Monitor Make scenarios closely for the first week after each cutover
- Keep your Zapier account active for 30 days after full migration as a safety net
- Cancel your Zapier subscription once everything is verified
Timeline Expectations
| Migration Size | Estimated Time |
|---|---|
| 1-5 simple Zaps | 1-2 days |
| 10-20 mixed Zaps | 1-2 weeks |
| 50+ complex Zaps | 4-8 weeks |
The biggest time investment is learning Make's interface and re-authenticating all your connected accounts. Once you are comfortable with Make, individual workflow recreation typically takes 15-45 minutes per Zap depending on complexity.
Related Questions
Related Tools
Activepieces
No-code workflow automation with self-hosting and AI-powered features
Workflow AutomationAutomatisch
Open-source Zapier alternative
Workflow AutomationBardeen
AI-powered browser automation via Chrome extension
Workflow AutomationCamunda
Open-source workflow and process automation platform using BPMN.
Workflow AutomationRelated Rankings
Best AI-Powered Automation Tools in 2026
AI-powered automation tools integrate artificial intelligence features — natural language workflow creation, intelligent data mapping, predictive actions, and LLM-based content generation — into their automation platforms. As of March 2026, most major automation platforms have added AI capabilities, but the depth and practical utility of these features varies significantly. This ranking evaluates 8 automation tools on the practical value of their AI features, not marketing claims. The evaluation focuses on whether AI features reduce manual configuration, accelerate workflow creation, and improve outcomes versus doing the same work without AI. Tools that use AI as a core differentiator (not just a checkbox feature) score higher.
Best Automation Tools for Startups in 2026
Startups need automation tools that provide immediate value at minimal cost, with room to scale as the team grows. The best startup automation tools offer generous free tiers, fast time-to-value (first working automation within hours, not days), and a clear scaling path from 5-person team to 50-person company. This ranking evaluates 8 automation platforms specifically for startup relevance as of March 2026. The evaluation prioritizes free tier generosity, speed from signup to first working automation, scalability as the team and workflow count grow, integration breadth covering the typical startup tech stack (Slack, Google Workspace, HubSpot, Stripe, GitHub, Notion), and total cost at early-stage volumes (under 50,000 tasks per month).
Dive Deeper
Make vs Power Automate in 2026: Visual Flexibility vs Microsoft Ecosystem
A detailed comparison of Make and Power Automate covering visual builders, integration ecosystems, pricing models, AI features, enterprise compliance, and real deployment data from parallel testing.
Zapier vs IFTTT in 2026: Professional Automation vs Consumer Simplicity
A detailed comparison of Zapier and IFTTT covering target audiences, integration ecosystems, workflow complexity, pricing, smart home capabilities, and AI features with real deployment data.
n8n vs Windmill in 2026: Visual Open-Source vs Code-First Automation
A detailed comparison of n8n and Windmill covering architecture, integration approaches, pricing, developer experience, execution performance, and real deployment data from parallel testing.